It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by robhines
Seriously, how can some of you debunkers say that this is a bug?
Originally posted by seeker1977
Wow, MSNBC is weighing in on this case at the below website.
cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com...
They even mention the Above Top Secret crowd there
"For some of the denizens of the Above Top Secret online forum, the nature of the spot, or spots, was obvious: It's a bug, or bugs."
Originally posted by Chadwickus
reply to post by robhines
I dunno...maybe because of this:
www.abovetopsecret.com...
Originally posted by Orkojoker
Here's another comment from Leslie Kean from an email sent to msn.com's science editor Alan Boyle.
"I went back to the CEFAA official re the bugs, and he said that's what they all thought at first when they got the first film (the one I posted). But when they went and got additional footage from very different vantage points which showed the same thing, they knew that was impossible. I don't think they're that stupid to claim this is a UFO if it was a bug, given that so many experts looked at it."
And one more from Boyle's article, expressing something we should probably all consider:
"Maybe we'll find out it's a bug, but I seriously doubt it," Kean told me. She said she took Bermudez and his fellow investigators at their word. "All I know is that people who know way more about photo analysis than I have ruled that out," Kean said.
Originally posted by easynow
If it was caught on multiple cameras ..
.... then it's definitely not a bug.
IMO ... It's either a blird or a UFO
Originally posted by UFOGlobe
reply to post by easynow
Oh yes, because there is no way that multiple cameras can all have bugs in view.
I'd like to see their synchronization of every video, and their calculations and measurements that triangulate every object in said videos, and I'd like to see the objects make the same exact movements in multiple videos to confirm that the same exact objects are filmed in multiple videos.
I'm doubting very much they did any of that. I am putting my money on the idea that all the videos show different bugs.
Originally posted by Turq1
Assuming the other cameras where not stacked on top of one another, you probably couldn't get that same affect from multiple cameras.
Originally posted by UFOGlobe
Originally posted by Turq1
Assuming the other cameras where not stacked on top of one another, you probably couldn't get that same affect from multiple cameras.
I know...
What if bugs were flying in close proximity of the other cameras too? Why is that one camera so special as to only have bugs fly in front of it? Why can't the other cameras have bugs flying in front of it?
What I predict is that the other videos 2 - 7 will just be of different bugs, and they are incorrectly assuming they are the same bugs in video 1.edit on 16-3-2012 by UFOGlobe because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by robhines
Seriously, how can some of you debunkers say that this is a bug?
It's just beyond belief.
Originally posted by UFOGlobe
I'd like to see their synchronization of every video, and their calculations and measurements that triangulate every object in said videos, and I'd like to see the objects make the same exact movements in multiple videos to confirm that the same exact objects are filmed in multiple videos.
Originally posted by easynow
If it was caught on multiple cameras ..
.... then it's definitely not a bug.
IMO ... It's either a blird or a UFO
1) This happened over a year ago and people are still working on analyzing this? If the evidence was truly that good, it would take a few months at best to come up with a reasonable analysis to demonstrate it was something not of this earth.
2) It is being leaked out to various UFO blogs instead of publishing in a scientific journal. If it were good evidence, that is where it would appear, and not the Huffington Post.
3) The videos are unavailable to be analyzed from outside sources. Perhaps they learned from the Mexican Air Force video debacle. Once the videos were revealed in sufficient length, many people identified the source of the images as being from oil wells in the gulf. A lot of people had egg on their face from that one. NARCAP was initially involved with that one, but then later stated they could not properly analyze the video because of the provenance being questionable or some excuse similar to that.
4) The videos have no provenance. We don't know what has been done to them since the day of the event.
Source