HD video of UFO Stalking Chilean Jets Over Santiago Air Base

page: 22
56
<< 19  20  21    23  24  25 >>

log in

join

posted on Mar, 20 2012 @ 07:39 AM
link   

Originally posted by GezinhoKiko
reply to post by cripmeister
 


thats what i dont understand either
they must know something we dont


Perhaps they are desperate to legitimize their existence, perhaps they are bored or perhaps they are just incompetent. I go with incompetent.




posted on Mar, 20 2012 @ 02:01 PM
link   
reply to post by cripmeister
 


it would certainly seem that way
maybe they felt left out



posted on Mar, 20 2012 @ 03:06 PM
link   
Here is your proof that one of the objects is just a flying insect:



I still don't doubt the rest are insects too.
edit on 20-3-2012 by UFOGlobe because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 20 2012 @ 04:13 PM
link   
This video analisys is real confusing with Those weird annoying black bars and also why there are no zooms in the object only a red circle so we cannot see if there is an object in the ground only in the sky.... A decent analisys should have zoom parts where the object appear... If you see this in full screen you will find out that in some parts specially in the ground the red circle is empty nothing is there if it was really a bug something had to be there.... And suddenly the object can be seen clearly next to the mountains in the sky ....


Originally posted by UFOGlobe
Here is your proof that one of the objects is just a flying insect:



I still don't doubt the rest are insects too.
edit on 20-3-2012 by UFOGlobe because: (no reason given)
edit on 20-3-2012 by pla123 because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 20 2012 @ 04:24 PM
link   
reply to post by pla123
 


The black bars are because the video was stabilized. The bars are the edge of the video moving around.

Also, the video was zoomed in. If it was zoomed in any more then you wont see the entire flight of it, and it would be really blurry.

Watch that video at 1080p and keep replaying the part that circles the object. When a circle passes, keep your eyes there and replay the video and you will definitely see it.

Or better yet, download the source video and find it your self. The video just points the way.



posted on Mar, 20 2012 @ 04:35 PM
link   
reply to post by UFOGlobe
 


Even if it is really blurry if something was actually coming from the ground something had to be there and this could be pointed out by zooming that area, even if blurred , I zoomed myself and all i see in someparts is an empty red circle... and then sudenly a "detailed" disc shaped object in the sky... this is quite a transformation does this bug have camuflage capabilities ?



posted on Mar, 20 2012 @ 04:45 PM
link   
reply to post by pla123
 




I agree this bug is hard to see, after all we are only talking about a total of 5 or more pixels, but it is there. Try looking in the area without using the circles. Or maybe see an eye doctor?


As for your camouflage joke, well I'm pretty sure the bug was just out of focus for a bit and it blended in with the foreground quite well. As it flew away from the camera and higher in the sky area, it probably became slightly more in focus and then it was silhouetted by the sky making it clear as day to see.

Like I said, try downloading the video and zooming in your self. People can't do everything for you.

edit on 20-3-2012 by UFOGlobe because: (no reason given)


Does this help at all?



click here to see a larger version
edit on 20-3-2012 by UFOGlobe because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 20 2012 @ 05:48 PM
link   

Originally posted by UFOGlobe
reply to post by pla123
 



Does this help at all?



click here to see a larger version]

Resized to 400px and Slowed down a touch.....




Cheers.



posted on Mar, 20 2012 @ 07:15 PM
link   
reply to post by Shino
 


I'd say it's too quick to be a bird or insect, good vid.
The fact that it comes zooming in quicker than the jets can fly by points me to believe it's not any animal.

IDK though, debunked yet?



posted on Mar, 20 2012 @ 07:42 PM
link   

Originally posted by UFOGlobe
reply to post by RSF77
 

{snip}

The complete source to the first 3 videos have been released, you can download them here:

ufosontherecord.com...

Here’s the only body of text in the slideshow available at Kean’s website detailing the somewhat disappointing findings of Luis Barrera’s analysis (above quote):


It’s a flash vid so you can’t copy & paste it but here’s the clunky (automated) translation cleaned up a bit:


Comments:

1 - Not a meteoroid or asteroid debris entering the atmosphere.

2 - Not related pieces of Comet entering the atmosphere.

3 - Not space junk (the object has intentional movements).

4 - No plane or bird.

5 - The object made a hazardous flight maneuver against the falcons W-E-W.

6 - The object performs a flight maneuver at low altitude and high speed.

7 - The maneuver has an elliptical path (or loop), and perpendicular to the direction of aircraft flying falcons (S to N).

8 - The object shows light and shadow effects du on its surface, metallic-looking, low-reflection. THE object displays an ellipsoidal shape.

9 - The object shows slight signs of activity at the bottom.

10 - Earth observers fail to detect the object, although it passes over their heads, therefore the maneuver of the object is not accompanied by a sound wave front.

11 - The object moves to the E with an inclination - 25 degrees.



Cheers.



posted on Mar, 20 2012 @ 07:52 PM
link   
Definitely agree, this new video appears to be a bug, OR a miniature Alien ship from Miniature world.
It does seem to fly much slower than the original video submitted, perhaps it hadnt attained maximum velocity yet.
They seem to have big bugs in Chile.



posted on Mar, 20 2012 @ 08:43 PM
link   
reply to post by DrDil
 


Yes, I was looking at those slides. I found it kind of funny where they... guessed?... where the starting location of the UFO (bug) was...



I am really curious to know how they arrived at the above conclusion. I really can only think of two ways... 1) They erroneously thought the object was visible in another video and triangulated the position based on that... or 2) They just straight guessed.



posted on Mar, 20 2012 @ 09:33 PM
link   
reply to post by UFOGlobe
 


thank you for the images , and you can see in Drdrill´s picture where there are parts when there is absolutelly nothing.... A blank red circle, for example next to the montains.

Other than the fact that this is not the only time the UFO appears in this footage if this is really a bug like you say, why it keeps coming back ? Like it is patroling the area ?

My eyes are very well so well that i can see the UFO without having to slow it down . Including the metalic appearence never heard of a METALIC bug before...

For me this is already a UFO , Assuming this is a craft of somekind I can conclude that it can reach incredible speeds because of the gravitational technology



posted on Mar, 20 2012 @ 09:43 PM
link   

Originally posted by pla123
reply to post by UFOGlobe
 



Other than the fact that this is not the only time the UFO appears in this footage if this is really a bug like you say, why it keeps coming back ? Like it is patroling the area ?

My eyes are very well so well that i can see the UFO without having to slow it down . Including the metalic appearence never heard of a METALIC bug before...



metallic looking bugs..

i cant believe i googled that....i have a severe phobia of bugs....
but lots of bugs can give off a metalic sheen when the sun hits them.....

and why would the bug keep coming back? they are in a desert environment...probably lots of bugs flying around. maybe the cameraman was stinky....maybe there was food around.....the list goes on why there would be bugs flying around....but......they are outside! lots of nasty bugs out there!!!



posted on Mar, 20 2012 @ 10:15 PM
link   

Originally posted by pla123
reply to post by UFOGlobe
 


// Other than the fact that this is not the only time the UFO appears in this footage if this is really a bug like you say, why it keeps coming back ? Like it is patroling the area ?


If there is one, there are generally more of them in the vicinity.



My eyes are very well so well that i can see the UFO without having to slow it down . Including the metalic appearence never heard of a METALIC bug before...


Lo and behold, one of the most common kinds of fly in the entire world, blowflies from the Luciliinae suborder:


There are tens of thousands of metallic insect species (probably a lot more, actually), but even non-metallic looking insects tend to sport shiny wings...



For me this is already a UFO , Assuming this is a craft of somekind I can conclude that it can reach incredible speeds because of the gravitational technology


Not bad...



posted on Mar, 20 2012 @ 10:28 PM
link   

Originally posted by greeneyedleo


metallic looking bugs..

i cant believe i googled that....i have a severe phobia of bugs....
but lots of bugs can give off a metalic sheen when the sun hits them.....

and why would the bug keep coming back? they are in a desert environment...probably lots of bugs flying around. maybe the cameraman was stinky....maybe there was food around.....the list goes on why there would be bugs flying around....but......they are outside! lots of nasty bugs out there!!!



entoman and myself discussed metallic looking bugs earlier in the thread, for reference.

But also there is still the question of other videos and vantage points that I still want to see resolved. IIRC, this one vidoe was said to have been the best, is it possible that the others show something else and one (this one) happened to be an insect?



posted on Mar, 20 2012 @ 10:31 PM
link   

Originally posted by pla123
reply to post by UFOGlobe
 


thank you for the images , and you can see in Drdrill´s picture where there are parts when there is absolutelly nothing.... A blank red circle, for example next to the montains.

Other than the fact that this is not the only time the UFO appears in this footage if this is really a bug like you say, why it keeps coming back ? Like it is patroling the area ?

My eyes are very well so well that i can see the UFO without having to slow it down . Including the metalic appearence never heard of a METALIC bug before...

For me this is already a UFO , Assuming this is a craft of somekind I can conclude that it can reach incredible speeds because of the gravitational technology


??

And this is why people like UFOGlobe will probably continue to believe that any person who believes that even 0.01% of UFOs may be 'real' is a lunatic. I mean, c'mon, he may be abrasive and leave a bad taste and all, but you've gotta admit, pla123, that his video is very well-done.

Here's what bothers me most with all of this:

In her article, Keane says: "The UFO was captured on seven cameras from different vantage points.... Each video included three different, mainly horizontal loops flown by the UFO within seconds of each other."

And she writes this in another place (underneath the slide-show caption): "CEFAA officials collected seven videos of the El Bosque UFO taken from different vantage points."

(And how about Alejandro Rojas? His article on Huffington Post states: "...seven witnesses came forward afterward with different videos all showing a strange metallic object moving at extremely high speeds." Not that I had considered him as credible as Keane, but still....)

Also, Barrera has said that there are insects on the videos that they were able to use for comparison purposes....

But he now also says that 3 of the 7 videos have been released in full.(!!??!!) The ones on Keane's site. And yet those 3 videos "from different angles" appear to be from the same camera from nearly the same spot... (though yeah, I guess they're technically tilted at different angles and all so at a "different vantage point" each time?!?)

I'll say is this: given the claims made, the Chileans had BETTER have some not-yet-released footage that shows, unambiguously, the UFO-triangulation that has been pretty clearly implied all along. ("Seven videos," "seven angles", etc...) If such footage does not exist, then Keane's credibility has been damaged. Significantly, in my mind. Because I believe she's said that she'd not even seen all the videos before writing her article.

So yeah... I'll still wait for all the data before coming to a conclusion, of course, but knowing (I think?) that we've got basically half the raw footage already, instead of the 1/7th that many were thinking... well, now what are the odds that they're sitting on something golden down there and saving the best for last?



posted on Mar, 20 2012 @ 10:48 PM
link   
Ok is it just me or the UFO "bug" that appear in that footage really resemble the one appearing in this one?




i didnt know bugs could fly above clouds....

here is a picture of the event... doesnt it look very familiar to you ??
Compare the object of the 2 images see the similarities ??







I still believe this is a UFO , craft of somekind clearly...
edit on 20-3-2012 by pla123 because: (no reason given)
edit on 20-3-2012 by pla123 because: (no reason given)
edit on 20-3-2012 by pla123 because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 20 2012 @ 11:02 PM
link   
reply to post by TeaAndStrumpets
 


Dr. Haines statement that appeared on UFOupDates suggests that the case was not meant to see the light of day as far as he knew. That is until it was mentioned last month in a discussion by the head of CEFAA at the UFO conference that Kean attended.

As opposed to other CEFAA cases that have been transparently made public. It almost seems like this case was accidentally included in a presentation at the UFO conference. I don't know that but just offering the thought to ponder.

edit on 20-3-2012 by lost_shaman because: Spelling error.



posted on Mar, 20 2012 @ 11:10 PM
link   

Originally posted by pla123
Ok is it just me or the UFO "bug" that appear in that footage really resemble the one appearing in this one?
[video]
i didnt know bugs could fly above clouds....


What kind of logic is that? Strawman much? Besides, those clouds are clearly low level clouds at below 6000ft (and the video also states that it was right after take-off). Insects have been recorded flying at over 15000ft. I am not suggesting that the flight video above shows an insect though, that would make zero sense.



here is a picture of the event... doesnt it look very familiar to you ??
Compare the object of the 2 images see the similarities ??




Yes, here goes: it is a fuzzy speck that has a dark area and a brighter area... That's where the similarities end. Now, let's look at the differences. Manner of movement is totally different, altitude is different... Oh, I'm wasting my time.



I still believe this is a UFO , craft of somekind clearly...


Amazing.
edit on 20-3-2012 by entoman because: (no reason given)





new topics

top topics



 
56
<< 19  20  21    23  24  25 >>

log in

join