Help ATS with a contribution via PayPal:
learn more

A U.F.O. Factory on Mars?

page: 3
11
<< 1  2    4 >>

log in

join

posted on Mar, 15 2012 @ 01:49 PM
link   
reply to post by afgang
 


Lossless data compression is a class of data compression algorithms that allows the exact original data to be reconstructed from the compressed data. The term lossless is in contrast to lossy data compression, which only allows an approximation of the original data to be reconstructed, in exchange for better compression rates.




posted on Mar, 15 2012 @ 01:56 PM
link   
"Unbelievable anomaly" = digital compression artifacts.

JHC... the stupidity of the posts on ATS has gotten to such a degree that I am just about ready to stop visiting this site. There is much crap on here and almost nothing worth reading any more. I have to sort through all this BULLSH1T to get to anything of real interest.

Stop posting this garbage. UFOs on the sun, UFO factories in the martian atmosphere. STOP!



edit on 15-3-2012 by AwakeinNM because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 15 2012 @ 02:03 PM
link   
reply to post by RPeternell
 


I nearly choked on my coffee!!:


I am a professional at what I do....


Yet, having made that claim, the absurdity continues, with these obvious digital artifacts from the tampering?

A "professional" that doesn't understand what he has done to cause these "anomalies" in the first place?

Not buying it...not for a nano-second.



posted on Mar, 15 2012 @ 02:07 PM
link   
Over exposure just reveals a lossy jpeg compression.





posted on Mar, 15 2012 @ 02:25 PM
link   
Oh, dear. More garbage.

You can get the same results zooming into a .jpeg at 400% beyond standard size and hitting it with any sharpen, 'find edge,' or edge enhancement filter while even looking at a totally empty space. If you spam it with enough solarize/posterize/sharpen filters, you can see just about whatever you want in the barely recognizable jigsaw hash that comes out of it.

Yeah, you are going to see all kinds of square and rectangle structures. That's because PIXELS ARE SQUARE.

(Did you just label yourself a "professional" at what you do? lol...come on. Don't make us start asking for verification. You'd hate how that would go.)
edit on 15-3-2012 by DissonantOne because: spelling



posted on Mar, 15 2012 @ 03:50 PM
link   
The video was made in a question, not an answer. I simply asked your opinion. Ya'll are always gettin yer panties up in a bunch! Constructive critisism is good , but when it contains sarcasm as ATS subscribers seem to be, it just makes me smile. Debate is good, but there is no debate here, its degrate! have a nice day ya'll and God bless.



posted on Mar, 15 2012 @ 03:54 PM
link   

Originally posted by RPeternell
reply to post by Human_Alien
 


Lossless data compression is a class of data compression algorithms that allows the exact original data to be reconstructed from the compressed data. The term lossless is in contrast to lossy data compression, which only allows an approximation of the original data to be reconstructed, in exchange for better compression rates. I am a professional at what I do, but I understand your comment. R Peternell


May I ask what is it you do and what you are a professional at?

Im with the others, I see extreme tool playing in photoshop....
This is nothing but image manipulation not bringing out actual objects but brining out over processed pixels and creating some colorful artwork....



im in photoshop daily and i know exactly what is going on here....
edit on March 15th 2012 by greeneyedleo because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 15 2012 @ 03:54 PM
link   
reply to post by DissonantOne
 


Why dont you just search Curt and then my last name and then Nasa. If that will make you feel better!



posted on Mar, 15 2012 @ 04:35 PM
link   

Originally posted by RPeternell
reply to post by DissonantOne
 


Why dont you just search Curt and then my last name and then Nasa. If that will make you feel better!


LOL.....so you have a mechanical engineering degree from Purdue and, as stated in one of "your" interviews:




started working down here as an instructor for the astronauts and also as a flight controller to control the International Space Station thermal and electrical systems


yet you are now doing Art for NASA? I will just be blunt and call complete BS on everything you say as well as your claimed "persona" coupled with the fact that your own youtube page cites quotes from you saying the government, and in particular, NASA, told you to take you stuff down for copyright issues. If you are in art and work with NASA's photos all day then you would know the proper channels to be able to use these photos in your videos and would most likely have had to go through proper channels to get permission to use them.

Prove me wrong....please. You do the same thing on every post you make....you get criticized then disappear from the thread and begin a new one with even more sensational claims....



posted on Mar, 15 2012 @ 04:41 PM
link   
And by the way.....you fail at even trying to back up your own false claim of being Curt Peternell.....he doesn't work for NASA anymore. Hasn't since last year and also has nothing to do with Art or Design for NASA.

Your statement from page 2:




Originally posted by RPeternell

Hello Mr weather balloon. If I told you I work for Nasa in the Art&Design department and I am doing my job to give you bits and pieces of reality, You wouldn't believe that either. Just another lie. Good day.


Care to try again?

Deny ignorance........or at least try to
edit on 3/15/12 by Vasa Croe because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 15 2012 @ 04:57 PM
link   
reply to post by RPeternell
 


I highly recommend you learn about digital imaging before making such claims. This is not even close to a reasonable assumption.

As you by now no doubt realize, this place is crawling with people who are very experienced. Your video shows nothing of interest whatsoever. It only shows you don't know much about digital imaging. Sorry



posted on Mar, 15 2012 @ 05:14 PM
link   
Maybe that is why I am not worried about posting here. And maybe I am trying to reverse what I have seen before in the photos. Its all good. take care.
edit on 15-3-2012 by RPeternell because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 15 2012 @ 05:15 PM
link   
Oh..and I almost forgot the icing.....

I love how you yanked the EXACT definition of lossless data compression straight from Wikipedia without reference or quote....

Lossless Data Compression




Lossless data compression is a class of data compression algorithms that allows the exact original data to be reconstructed from the compressed data. The term lossless is in contrast to lossy data compression, which only allows an approximation of the original data to be reconstructed, in exchange for better compression rates.


Credibility fail......sorry but my idea of deny ignorance is also to make sure that those that spread it are stopped as well......



posted on Mar, 15 2012 @ 05:24 PM
link   

Originally posted by RPeternell
Maybe that is why I am not worried about posting here. And maybe I am trying to reverse what I have seen before in the photos. Its all good. take care.
edit on 15-3-2012 by RPeternell because: (no reason given)


Really? Because if you really did work for NASA and really did have access to pictures that showed bases on another celestial body, or alligators if you will, you would have had to sign plenty of NDA type docs and had secret clearances that would have held you on counts of treason for releasing such information.

Fail again. This is getting old but I still love the game.....

I used to be in the FBI for cyber-crimes, but now I do high school janitorial work.



posted on Mar, 15 2012 @ 05:39 PM
link   
another pointless thread I have wasted my time on

you are highlighting image artefacts in a compressed image.

nice try, but NOPE



posted on Mar, 15 2012 @ 05:48 PM
link   

Originally posted by RPeternell
The video was made in a question, not an answer. I simply asked your opinion. Ya'll are always gettin yer panties up in a bunch! Constructive critisism is good , but when it contains sarcasm as ATS subscribers seem to be, it just makes me smile. Debate is good, but there is no debate here, its degrate! have a nice day ya'll and God bless.



I agree. It's one thing debating a topic but when it gets down to mud-slinging...the very people who say threads like this make ATS not worth visiting....are the very people who taunt, tease and ridicule like a 4th-grader.

The OPs profession is NOT in question. By the way, where's YOUR certificate showing YOU'RE a pilot (and you know who I mean)?????
Making an OP look inept or unworthy is where these threads fall apart and hate enters in.

We're talking about the substance of his thread. Not his chromosomes of who he is or isn't.

I find OP to be excitable in his findings and he just doesn't present them in a way that isn't 'in-your-face'. That is what I personally have a problem with. He sorta asks 'what do you think' but yet refers to those things by name, like: _ alligator. craft.

He (you) must try to remove or suspend YOUR beliefs and show your findings more Objectively. Not subjectively. Ya know?

But I do agree....I wish some of these members would find a new home!



posted on Mar, 15 2012 @ 05:51 PM
link   

Originally posted by Human_Alien

Originally posted by RPeternell
The video was made in a question, not an answer. I simply asked your opinion. Ya'll are always gettin yer panties up in a bunch! Constructive critisism is good , but when it contains sarcasm as ATS subscribers seem to be, it just makes me smile. Debate is good, but there is no debate here, its degrate! have a nice day ya'll and God bless.



I agree. It's one thing debating a topic but when it gets down to mud-slinging...the very people who say threads like this make ATS not worth visiting....are the very people who taunt, tease and ridicule like a 4th-grader.

The OPs profession is NOT in question. By the way, where's YOUR certificate showing YOU'RE a pilot (and you know who I mean)?????
Making an OP look inept or unworthy is where these threads fall apart and hate enters in.

We're talking about the substance of his thread. Not his chromosomes of who he is or isn't.

I find OP to be excitable in his findings and he just doesn't present them in a way that isn't 'in-your-face'. That is what I personally have a problem with. He sorta asks 'what do you think' but yet refers to those things by name, like: _ alligator. craft.

He (you) must try to remove or suspend YOUR beliefs and show your findings more Objectively. Not subjectively. Ya know?

But I do agree....I wish some of these members would find a new home!



He said he was a professional "at this" (whatever that means), so yeah, his profession is fair game now. He brought it up. Nobody else. He is making the claims....and hinting at being someone in a certain position at a certain agencey.

As far as the other member, that member has been vetted by staff. Assuming we are talking about the same one and im sure we are.

As one who is in PS everyday......the images are nothing but extreme manipulation of the tools. They are not showing any UFO factory. It is photo manipulation and Pareidolia...
One could take an image of some desert on Earth and produce the same results......
edit on March 15th 2012 by greeneyedleo because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 15 2012 @ 05:56 PM
link   
Okay! Curt and I are just getting a few kicks here, I am his brother. It pisses him off to see people act like most people in this thread. He just wishes ya'll would open up your minds. He tells me where to try and bring in images, so I try. I cannot say anymore other than Curtis says " Only wise men keep a open mind"
RPeternell



posted on Mar, 15 2012 @ 05:58 PM
link   
reply to post by greeneyedleo
 


Okay. OP brought it up. But we're visiting this thread because of the finding not his profession. I know it's fair-game now (that he brought it up) but it just feels like an assault. Not debate. It's still HIS opinion regardless of his profession and THAT'S what we should be discussing. Not whether or not he works for NASA. Make another thread for that.

PS. I'm sure we're talking about the same pilot-person
so.....good enough for me. But man, I'm glad he didn't piloted any of my flights with that abrasive attitude of his because I would've stormed the cockpit and been deemed a terrorist!
edit on 15-3-2012 by Human_Alien because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 15 2012 @ 06:03 PM
link   
reply to post by Human_Alien
 


Okay! Curt and I are just getting a few kicks here, I am his brother. It pisses him off to see people act like most people in this thread. He just wishes ya'll would open up your minds. He tells me where to try and bring in images, so I try. I cannot say anymore other than Curtis says " Only wise men keep a open mind"
RPeternell
He just said His german luger would of fired within the cockpit!





new topics

top topics



 
11
<< 1  2    4 >>

log in

join