It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by thedigirati
as to the possibility that Ancients knew things that we do not
I will put forward just 2 examples that are documented
Greek Fire
and
Baghdad Battery
Both of these are real, but we still have no Idea what they were (in the case of Greek Fire) or what they were used for.
Originally posted by thedigiratithe Oklo reactors are said to be a natural occurrence, but, what if?
Originally posted by R0CR13
.
Originally posted by Hanslune
reply to post by owtFsink
If there had been a massive nuclear war this would show in the sediment and ice coring from around the world and the Arctic and Antarctic it would also show up in deviations in the fossil pollen counts, etc
Says you the arbiter of all that is true .. but you are ignoring the evidence again .
"from the ancient Mahabharata: …a single projectile charged with all the power of the Universe. An incandescent column of smoke and flame As bright as the thousand suns Rose in all its splendour… a perpendicular explosion with its billowing smoke clouds… …the cloud of smoke rising after its first explosion formed into expanding round circles like the opening of giant parasols… ..it was an unknown weapon, an iron thunderbolt, a gigantic messenger of death, which reduced to ashes The entire race of the Vrishnis and the Andhakas. …The corpses were so burned as to be unrecognizable. The hair and nails fell out; Pottery broke without apparent cause, And the birds turned white. After a few hours All foodstuffs were infected… …to escape from this fire, the soldiers threw themselves in streams to wash themselves and their equipment. "
I'll go with the documentation ...
.
Originally posted by R0CR13
It Is Not A Direct Quote is is a collection of REFERENCES to the original texts .
Go argue with the Hindu Experts that i'm sure would dispute your statements .
Historian Kisari Mohan Ganguli says that Indian sacred writings are full of such descriptions, which sound like an atomic blast as experienced in Hiroshima and Nagasaki. He says references mention fighting sky chariots and final weapons. An ancient battle is described in the Drona Parva, a section of the Mahabharata. "The passage tells of combat where explosions of final weapons decimate entire armies, causing crowds of warriors with steeds and elephants and weapons to be carried away as if they were dry leaves of trees," says Ganguli.
"Instead of mushroom clouds, the writer describes a perpendicular explosion with its billowing smoke clouds as consecutive openings of giant parasols. There are comments about the contamination of food and people's hair falling out."
.
Originally posted by R0CR13
.
You also have a problem here with Flying craft ...
scienceinvedas.wordpress.com...
.
Originally posted by R0CR13
.
You want another source OK
en.wikipedia.org...
"Strong and durable must the body of the Vimana be made, like a great flying bird of light material. Inside one must put the mercury engine with its iron heating apparatus underneath. By means of the power latent in the mercury which sets the driving whirlwind in motion, a man sitting inside may travel a great distance in the sky. The movements of the Vimana are such that it can vertically ascend, vertically descend, move slanting forwards and backwards. With the help of the machines human beings can fly in the air and heavenly beings can come down to earth."
.
Originally posted by R0CR13
.
The quote is attributed to Samarangana Sutradhara ..
articles referencing ..
www.peter-thomson.com...
www.atlantisquest.com...
mathomathis.blogspot.com...
Richard Cedric Leonard is an author and lecturer on the pseudohistorical belief in ancient astronauts and the mythical city of Atlantis.
Originally posted by Hanslune
Provide a translation of the material from the original document by a noted scholar, not a fringe 'researcher'
Originally posted by Harte
What's referred to as the "Baghdad battery" is not known to be a battery at all and resembles scroll containers from the period.
In fact, the state the artifact was found in would have prevented it from being used as a wet cell battery, since the entire top was puposefully sealed over with bitumen, just like scroll jars often are.
The artifacts consist of terracotta pots approximately 130 mm tall containing a copper cylinder made of a rolled-up copper sheet, which houses a single iron or rod. At the top, the iron rod is isolated from the copper by bitumen plugs or stoppers, and both rod and cylinder fit snugly inside the opening of the jar, which bulges outward toward the middle.
The Build Team created several copies of the Baghdad Battery, an archaeological find which seems to suggest that ancient Babylonians were the first to use batteries.
Originally posted by owtFsink
Originally posted by Hanslune
Provide a translation of the material from the original document by a noted scholar, not a fringe 'researcher'
see...this is where you fail.
Just because an individual has a different perspective that goes against mainstream teachings they have been and probably always will be ostrasized by that mainstream community, funding cut short, access denied to proper research material, or worse...
you should stop standing on the shoulders of others purely becasue they are "popular" and start thinking for yourself instead of trying to do it for others.
...copper and iron scrolls?
Originally posted by Harte
"Archaeologist Francis Taylor," also quoted in that article, never existed either.
Again, I've looked. But don't trust me. Find evidence of his existence and I'll eat my words.
Originally posted by aorAki
Originally posted by Harte
"Archaeologist Francis Taylor," also quoted in that article, never existed either.
Again, I've looked. But don't trust me. Find evidence of his existence and I'll eat my words.
Oh hell. I agree with your posts as a whole, but I did find this: Francis Taylor
Now I'll wait for someone to twist your words and mine. Just because I found this doesn't mean I believe in ancient nuclear wars. I don't.edit on 29-4-2012 by aorAki because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by R0CR13
THE VEDIC ION ENGINE
aryaculture.tripod.com...
The great Rishi Bharadvaja has written a commentary on this in his book Yantra Vidya (Science of Machines). Bharadvaja elucidates the mechanism that provides the impulse needed for propulsion. It involves the combination of eight sub-assemblies and uses the interaction of principally Solar energy and Mercury
MAHARSHI BHARADWAAJA'S
VYMAANIKA-SHAASTRA
OR
SCIENCE OF AERONAUTICS
Part of his unknown work
"YANTRA SARVASVA"
or
"ALL ABOUT MACHINES"
as revealed to venerable
Pandit SUBBARAYA SASTRY
and recorded in hand-written Sanskrit Manuscript Form
translated into English by
G. R. JOSYER, M.A., Hons., F.R.E.S., M.R.S.L.
Originally posted by owtFsink
Originally posted by Harte
What's referred to as the "Baghdad battery" is not known to be a battery at all and resembles scroll containers from the period.
In fact, the state the artifact was found in would have prevented it from being used as a wet cell battery, since the entire top was puposefully sealed over with bitumen, just like scroll jars often are.
ummmm, yeah...the state it was found in is what...a few centuries of decay and aging from its last use?
lets suppose for a second that in as many years from now someone finds an old AA or even a car battery, and that there is no sufficient documentation to describe its exact function, do you think it would work as intended after that long?
Originally posted by aorAki
Originally posted by Harte
"Archaeologist Francis Taylor," also quoted in that article, never existed either.
Again, I've looked. But don't trust me. Find evidence of his existence and I'll eat my words.
Oh hell. I agree with your posts as a whole, but I did find this: Francis Taylor
Now I'll wait for someone to twist your words and mine. Just because I found this doesn't mean I believe in ancient nuclear wars. I don't.
Originally posted by Harte
So you've decided to ignore the established fact that the top was sealed over with bitumen, insulating the dissimilar metals and completely ruling out the possibility of electrical generation?
Nice worldview. It turns into whatever reality you care to choose at any moment.
I prefer reality, myself.
Harte