Originally posted by LightSpeedDriverNo pre-shocks or rumbles, just a huge "bang" that dies down...

That's the nature of most Norwegian quakes, they are often belived to be dynamite explosions.

That magnitude quakes are not uncommon around Scandinavia. Caused be post-glacial rebound I guess, as this was very near to surface. Earthquakes here can be felt far away, as rock here is very solid, not fractured like areas with stronger earthquakes. We had magnitude 3.? earthquake, near coast of Sweden in 2010. It was felt over 150 kilometers from epicenter, even though it was very weak. It was also first earthquake I have felt.

Really? We are arguing about the translation of March?

Really?

Face palm.

Would appreciate someone familiar with the subject at hand commenting. Please examine the following picture. It compares a (nuclear) detonation to a genuine earthquake. Someone on page one linked or posted a seismograph reading for this quake which looks suspiciously like...well, I'll let you be the judge.
Random internet source:


Linked pic from OP:

Originally posted by amongus
Really? We are arguing about the translation of March?

Really?

Face palm.

I really don't care just trying to figure out what the hell the article the op was referring to says and then people go on the attack. Sorry, just fending off attacks, my bad, you say 1 thing and there is 20 people chomping at the bit to tell you "you're wrong"

I think this site has turned into more of a bad day at the comedy house

Originally posted by LightSpeedDriver
Would appreciate someone familiar with the subject at hand commenting. Please examine the following picture. It compares a (nuclear) detonation to a genuine earthquake. Someone on page one linked or posted a seismograph reading for this quake which looks suspiciously like...well, I'll let you be the judge.
Random internet source:

Linked pic from OP:

edit on 14/3/12 by LightSpeedDriver because: Added pic

edit on 14/3/12 by LightSpeedDriver because: Typo

This looks very interesting and scary.
Does anyone have an idea on why the shape of this so called Earthquake looks of?

Originally posted by cayote

Originally posted by LightSpeedDriver
Would appreciate someone familiar with the subject at hand commenting. Please examine the following picture. It compares a (nuclear) detonation to a genuine earthquake. Someone on page one linked or posted a seismograph reading for this quake which looks suspiciously like...well, I'll let you be the judge.
Random internet source:

Linked pic from OP:

edit on 14/3/12 by LightSpeedDriver because: Added pic

edit on 14/3/12 by LightSpeedDriver because: Typo

This looks very interesting and scary.
Does anyone have an idea on why the shape of this so called Earthquake looks of?

Could this be an last test for the Seed bank they have in Scandinavia ( Norway, Sweden and Denmark )

Meeh, I couldn't feel anything

Well I don't know how to read those graphs, but I went through two quakes now in the past two years. The first one was a 3.6 I think, near my home, and had a loud boom then some moderate shaking that quickly died down. If I were asked to draw it using squiggles, my drawing would look like the graphs in red. The second quake was the 5.8 in Virginia. I was too far from the epicenter to note the bang sound some people heard with that one. If I were to represent the shaking with squiggles, it looks like the blue graph.

When I looked up earthquake history for my region, there were similar accounts for similar quakes and that was all well before nukes or even automatic weapons. If there were nukes involved in any of this wouldn't someone find and report high radiation readings?

read the story ,, the mag was 4.2 and i live in voss and felt nadda.. too bad i missed it ...