Legal scholars everywhere have different views about the scope and origin of this existing authority, but whatever it is, it hasn’t changed.
But I want to concentrate on a different aspect. For some time, there has been a controversy in the federal courts over how to interpret the Authorization to Use Military Force (AUMF) that Congress passed to give the President the power to fight the War on Terror.

The United States exists in two forms:
1. The original United States that was in operation until 1860; a collection of sovereign Republics in the union. Under the original Constitution the States controlled the Federal Government; the Federal Government did not control the States and had very little authority.
2. The original United States has been usurped by a separate and different UNITED STATES formed in 1871, which only controls the District of Columbia and it’s territories, and which is actually a corporation (the UNITED STATES CORPORATION) that acts as our current government. The United States Corporation operates under Corporate/Commercial/Public Law rather than Common/Private Law.

The original Constitution was never removed; it has simply been dormant since 1871. It is still intact to this day. This fact was made clear by Supreme Court Justice Marshall Harlan (Downes v. Bidwell, 182, U.S. 244 1901) by giving the following dissenting opinion: “Two national governments exist; one to be maintained under the Constitution, with all its restrictions; the other to be maintained by Congress outside and Independently of that Instrument.”

The Restore America Plan reclaimed the De Jure institutions of government of the 50 State Republics in order to restore Common Law that represents the voice of the people and ends Corporate Law that ignores the voice of the people while operating under Maritime/Admiralty/International Law. This occurred when warrants were delivered to all 50 Governors on March 30, 2010.

The rewritten Constitution of the UNITED STATES CORPORATION bypasses the original Constitution for the United States of America, which explains why our Congressmen and Senators don’t abide by it, and the President can write Executive Orders to do whatever he/she wants. They are following corporate laws that completely strip sovereigns of their God given unalienable rights. Corporate/Commercial/Public Law is not sovereign (private), as it is an agreement between two or more parties under contract. Common Law (which sovereigns operate under) is not Commercial Law; it is personal and private.

To understand this document, you need to understand some basic terms. Visit [link to www.usavsus.info/] for complete understanding. The basic terms are:

De Jure – Existing by right or according to law; original, lawful. Common Law operates under De Jure terms.

De Facto - In practice but not necessarily ordained by law; in fact, in reality. Corporate Law operates under De Facto terms.

Originally posted by ErtaiNaGia
reply to post by Rising Against

---

Hey ya.... Interesting thread, I had some questions, if you wouldn't mind applying your response mechanism to overcoming the challenges embedded within my specific method of *RETORT*

1. how can an ideology conduct a cold war?

In his speech, JFK mentions that "It" conducts the cold war..... was he referring to the political ideology of communism?

If so, why would he call it..... "It"?


2. "for we are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless...... political ideology?"

In this speech, JFK clearly states that "we are opposed by a monolothic and ruthless conspiracy"

He did not say nations, he did not say communism, or socialism, or whatever.....

Why do you think he shirked his responsibility in clearly labling the threat to the nation, if that threat was Communism?

Why would he call it a conspiracy, if calling it Communism would more easily identify the potential threat?


3. how can a political ideology be a conspiracy?

Related to the previous question, actually.


4. we are as a nation historically opposed to secret societies

Why didn't he say communism?

Why would he mention Secret Societies at all if he was referring to communism in his speech?

and for that matter, Why, if his speech was ABOUT communism, does he never mention it....

Once?

5. "but I am asking your help in the tremendous task of informing and alerting the American people".... of what?

If, as you say, the speech is JFK asking the press to keep some things secret..... why would he ask them to help him inform the public?

Would that not be against what you say is the PURPOSE of the speech?


6. If this thread was a well..... it smells like it has been poisoned.


That is all. *Shaman Out*