Harry Potter is the devil (not really)

page: 7
12
<< 4  5  6    8  9  10 >>

log in

join

posted on Mar, 23 2012 @ 12:41 PM
link   
reply to post by PulsusMeusGallo
 


i know this Red Hen she was a super-K0oK who never outgrew middle school. and Yeah she wrote that looooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooong buch of crap you linked which was a shame since every no0w and then the Ko0K would have a decent idea but it got lost in her excesive verbiage.

she hated Rowling Hell she hated all women in HP and the jealousy poured thru. Especially the good lookin ones like Emma Watso0n God how she drooled on and on about Hermione Granger and how she the RED HEN thought she was poorly cast, poorly acted poorly this n that and now look, Emma Watson is on her thirs movie and counting since the release of Hallows last year.

So much for RED HEN bs.




edit on 23-3-2012 by AlchemicalBinoculars because: (no reason given)




posted on Mar, 23 2012 @ 01:15 PM
link   

Originally posted by PulsusMeusGallo

Dix...His "theories", insider factual reports and literary works were copied by many including John Granger The Hogwarts Professor, Travis Prinzi of Hogshead Org and Hans Andrea of Harry Potter for Seekers among others (literary alchemical symbology, Christian themes, Rowling's agendas, etc etc etc).



Originally posted by AlchemicalBinoculars

Dix called out that right wing Xstian fraud Granger and exposed the Rowling-WB-Xstian faction-Beausignors scam. For what is was, a scam to press her ideas.




Non-comprendo.



posted on Mar, 23 2012 @ 02:46 PM
link   
I firmly believe anyone who practices sorcerery as taught in Harry Potter will burn in eternal lake of fire for all eternity.

If a school bus full of kindergarden children crashed and they were all reading Harry potter theyd all goto eternal perdition



posted on Mar, 23 2012 @ 04:18 PM
link   

Originally posted by Iason321
I firmly believe anyone who practices sorcerery as taught in Harry Potter will burn in eternal lake of fire for all eternity.

If a school bus full of kindergarden children crashed and they were all reading Harry potter theyd all goto eternal perdition






posted on Mar, 23 2012 @ 05:02 PM
link   
reply to post by TwoEggz
 


The author of the article in debate is Abigail BeauSeigneur, daughter of Warner Books science fiction author James BeauSeigneur.

Who is James BeauSeigneur prior to working with Warner Books? ex-NSA,

The BeauSeigneurs connection Christianity and with Warner Bros. does bring with it serious questions of the use of purposefully applied (dis)information which James BeauSeigneur would be well versed as a defense analyst of an intelligence arm of the USA.

It's was in Abigail BeauSeigneur's blood to write the article "Is Harry Potter the Son of God?" I imagine Daddy was proud.
One cannot deny that the tie-ins with Warner are quite troubling and MuggleNet has often been designed as Rowling's most favored fan website.

This article, it's timing, etc. casts an entirely different light on Rowling's hidden Christian agenda. WB had heard loud and clear the anti-HP Klan which espouses Potter novels/movies a acts of the Demon. What better way to introduce the purity of Potter by writing articles that align it with Christianity.

Victor Dix often reported that they would conference with Warner Bros. specifically discussing the potential anti-backlash from the Religious Right as everyone knew the day would have to come where Rowling would be required to fess up to the Christian allegorical content of Potter. Prior to 2007, when Rowling did infrequently address the subject, it was generalized response scripted by WB - "I am a Christian and that's all I will say about that" kinda thing.

Here is the Christian Right Wing coverage of the story which came out the day of the MuggleNet article

AB "Predicts" Christian Harry Potter As Christ Allegory

July 11, 2007 was the year of Warner Brothers released the movie based upon Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix and 10 days later on July 21, the last book in the series, entitled Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows was published.

This, along with the 10th anniversary of the publication of Book 1 on June 27th, created the "perfect storm" for summations of the Potter phenomenon, goodbyes to Harry, and tell-all interviews with author J.K. Rowling.

The MuggleNet article was published 7/13/07

MuggleNet - BeauSeigneur Article

Dix wrote "every intelligence operative's basic rule of thumb is that there are no coincidences".



edit on 23-3-2012 by PulsusMeusGallo because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 23 2012 @ 06:22 PM
link   
reply to post by PulsusMeusGallo
 


Let's see what we have here.

-James BeauSeigneur's (JB) "Christ Clone Trilogy" rights were sold and majcikally reclaimed from Warner Brothers (WB).

BeauSiegiHeiLneur Gets Paid Off

- JB's daughter Abigail BeauSeigneur (AB) writes an *extremely* and *extraordinarily* timely pro-Harry Potter piece for Mugglenet.and gets her payoff with the rare privilege of interviewing JKR "Ms. BeauSeigneur builds her argument on interviews with Harry Potter author J.K. Rowling..."

www.christiannewswire.com...

...and the Christian tabloids run with it.

Coordination like this is called conspiracy.



edit on 23-3-2012 by AlchemicalBinoculars because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 24 2012 @ 09:55 AM
link   
I don't get it.

Rowling was lying about her being a Christian and lying about writing the books to push Christianity? And these Beausigneurs are paid off patsies?



posted on Mar, 24 2012 @ 02:32 PM
link   

Originally posted by TwoEggz
I don't get it.

Rowling was lying about her being a Christian and lying about writing the books to push Christianity? And these Beausigneurs are paid off patsies?


o you got it alllright, right on the nose. Myths are from press, facts are from Victor Dix Letters.

Myth: Rowling wrote a Xstain book called Harry Potter.....etc
Fact: Rwoling wrote books, only two, the rest were collaborations as he went nutzoid and drug abusive

M: Rowling saw the whole Harry Potter thing, beginning, middle and end, on a vision on a train ride.
F: See above

M: Rowling divulged her Xstian agenda
F: She, the BeauSigneors and Warner conspired to make up the Xstian agenda, publicize the Xstian agenda to keep the Religious Right from banning the Potter books as "from the devil".

M: MuggleNet was a fan friendly forum full of fun and facts for Potter fans
F: Warner led Emerson Sparz around by the nose and the owner of Mugglenet played ball to get special attention. Mugglenet was the only forum to highlight the BeauSigneu fake Xstian article.

M: Rowling's "great vision" which came thruough trials and tibulationsof being a young mother with no Daddy about is inspiring and due to her strong Xstian belifs. "I haven't got the faintest idea where my ideas come from, or how my imagination works".

F: She wrote two kids books, the rest were AI computer outputs, and she plagiarized several existing authors to get the fit two books out.

Willy The Wizard - Wizard Chess, wizard prisons, wizards and elf freinds as servants, wizard newspapers, magical maps, wizard contests. Hell, they even fouond Daniel Radcliffe while scoping out Oliver Twist the play in England (which has several themes repeated in Potter).


Here's Rowling freaking out when asked about the tons of plagiarisms at the courthouse steps.



Question: What do you know about Rowling?

Answer: What they have told you

Question: What do you really know about the origins of the story?

Answer: What they have told you.



posted on Mar, 24 2012 @ 02:40 PM
link   
By the by, if you really need a spot on, no defense look at Rowlingsa palgiarism, look at this article.

Done deal.

Harry Potter vs Tim Hunter

I mean siriously black, c'mom this isn't debatable especially the parts where Warner has the series bought up.



posted on Mar, 24 2012 @ 03:04 PM
link   

Originally posted by AlchemicalBinoculars
By the by, if you really need a spot on, no defense look at Rowlingsa palgiarism, look at this article.

Done deal.

Harry Potter vs Tim Hunter

I mean siriously black, c'mom this isn't debatable especially the parts where Warner has the series bought up.




It's Harry, no it's Tim , no it is Harry, no it is absolutely Tim Hunter.




edit on 24-3-2012 by PulsusMeusGallo because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 24 2012 @ 03:39 PM
link   
Did people really buy into all that hogwash about an "idea on a train"? Do you seriously think that a good "idea" is all you need for a global best seller? Publisher's and literary agent's offices, even Rowling's Christopher Little's, groan at the seams with good 'ideas'.

The story never was an 'idea'. It is a constellation of many complex ideas derived from an individual's own life, none of which Rowling had or could have had... until she was presented with them . Potter is derived entirely from a real fictional personality who pre-existed him and who was known to those who read what Rowling read. Known in other words to the many people who read....

"Sam Muldoon and The Philosopher's Stone."

Yes, read that as you may, I am in very serious doubt that the first two books were "original" and in very serious concern that they too were spoonfed her by collaborators. Those collaborators according to Victor Dix were CIA who controls Time-Warner who owns the majority shares through subsidiaries Bloomsbury and Scholastic.

The OP stated "Harry Potter is the devil (not really)" and now I offer the following "anonymous author " who will put to rest the answer to this quasi-question:


“I have not the slightest doubt that the fire and crackle of imaginative exuberance, the originality of the vision and the wizarding world Adrian Jacobs created were stolen, hook, line and sinker by Christopher Little and his friend Joanne Rowling.

It is also my belated conviction that Rowling was in the process of rifling this work when she received the story “Sam Muldoon and the Philosopher’s Stone”. I was informed by her in her very last postcard to me, after I had told her everything I knew about the book and the series of seven others I had planned for it, that she was involved in a story about “a boy wizard and his adventures in the wonderful world of magic”.

I took it to be an outright lie at the start but now, from what I have learnt, I have revised my opinion. That was in August 1990. If that was so and she was not lying again, the only conclusion any of us can come to is that the first ORIGIN of the derivative called Harry Potter is Willy the Wizard (1986).

In 1987, when it was published, it can be said without fear of contradiction there could not possibly have been anything like it in children’s literature. ... honest work was stolen and rifled by a couple of crooks. It matters nought what they made it into. It matters not what accolades or money have been showered on these miscreants. They had no right whatsoever to assume wholesale ownership of what did not belong to them and which neither COULD HAVE created.

Rowling had never had a damn thing published before Potter, a fact that has been glossed over by everybody in the media who should know better. Nobody in their right mind is going to embark on writing a seven-book series without some inner assurance that their stuff is at the very least publishable. There are many in lunatic asylums getting treatment for delusions a whole lot less severe than that.

That is the sober fact. The truth is she must have had a cast iron gurantee that it would be published and likely knew who that publisher was going to be. The fact that Barry Cunningham ends up her editor at Bloomsbury and she takes up home in a part of Edinburgh where “hundreds” of his relatives live is no accident. really does have to feel for David Markson and the family of his friend Adrian Jacobs. Not only was their case stopped dead in its tracks, but a great talent, that of David Markson was also brought grindingly to a halt by Little to whom he had been contracted with a novel of his own.

This plagiarizing of talent, to my mind, is a hideous and very serious crime that the law has not evaluated properly...The plagiarism that spawned Potter is also an indictment on the British Press and Google who helped that crime and protected it...Potter will, in the end, be nothing but a contemptible monument to a crime against all of us and our creative integrity. A mockery of individual, creative freedom.

It’s real purpose, I am convinced, has nothing whatsoever to do with literature. Control, wealth, power, linguistic programming, occultism,… evil in a word; it is all of that.

That conviction is based squarely on the degree to which the alleged author is protected in the media... and, of course, the ramparts of secrecy erected around all the key players in the crime. I take my hat off to "David Markson" and all those who are helping in the case. They are brave men and true, standing up for something that affects us all, with support from so very few.“



posted on Mar, 24 2012 @ 05:59 PM
link   

The Christopher Little agency, run in 'cramped' and 'near-Dickensian' offices in Fulham, south-west London, was cash-strapped until touched by Potter's magic wand. Rowling, then a penniless 29-year-old single mother, walked into a public library in Edinburgh, looked up a list of literary agents and settled on the name Christopher Little because it sounded like a character from a children's book.



edit on 24-3-2012 by TwoEggz because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 24 2012 @ 07:38 PM
link   

Originally posted by TwoEggz


The Christopher Little agency, run in 'cramped' and 'near-Dickensian' offices in Fulham, south-west London, was cash-strapped until touched by Potter's magic wand. Rowling, then a penniless 29-year-old single mother, walked into a public library in Edinburgh, looked up a list of literary agents and settled on the name Christopher Little because it sounded like a character from a children's book.




Interesting thing, this marvel of timing.
This is a "false trail".

Both Bloomsbury Publishing and the Little agency are "poor.
Bloomsbury had started a child's fiction division in 1994, the costs are enormous to do so. I guess that was crystal ball gazing, yes? Bloomsbury send Alan Wherry on a whim in 1996 to New York to open a children’s book division there? Pure, "poor" dumb luck?

Nope. It was preparation. They need to front the great cause and must establish a children’s fiction section to do so. Setting loose a kid’s blockbuster with no history of involvement in children’s fiction whatsoever would have made more than a few eyebrows raise. Publishers in London are still scratching their heads over Bloomsbury’s “good luck”. They needn’t. Luck had nothing to do with it, poor they were not.

Her editor at Bloomsbury, Barry Cunningham, says he got the manuscript from Christopher Little, Rowling's agent, in the post.. in a brown envelope. “I just got the brown envelope one day". Can you the sheer audacity to out-and-out lie ---> these people think we are that dumb? Obviously.

Christopher Little, now that's another story altogether. Luck? Cute name?
Little’s office manager Bryony Evens finds the book by accident in the trash can not knowing a thing about it.

Rowling had rolled into his office in 1990 with the manuscript she wanted to rip. Adrian Jacob's Willy The Wizard, this is where she nicked the character, Harry Potter. Once she had the character and knew, thanks to the conscienceless sleuthing of Bloomsbury's Cunningham, what exactly made him tick, she dyed his hair, put specs on him, signed his forehead etc; the kind of things you might do yourself, if you stole somebody’s bike, or schoolbag or motor car, or life and could imagine nothing beyond what you had found in the comics of Neil Gaiman.



Or Willy The Wizard.



Let's see, train, wizard's chess, wands doing magic, etc. etc. yeppers, all there.
edit on 24-3-2012 by PulsusMeusGallo because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 24 2012 @ 08:11 PM
link   
And the beat goes on...

The Great Harry Potter Scam



posted on Mar, 24 2012 @ 09:09 PM
link   

Originally posted by PulsusMeusGallo
And the beat goes on...

The Great Harry Potter Scam


Im sure no one reading this thread will know where that came from. It's your a$$ now.



posted on Mar, 25 2012 @ 10:14 AM
link   

Originally posted by PulsusMeusGallo

And the beat goes on...

The Great Harry Potter Scam



Originally posted by AlchemicalBinoculars

Im sure no one reading this thread will know where that came from. It's your a$$ now.


Attempt at thread hijack noted.
Now back to the topic...Harry Potter is the devil...

Who was it that said that the Devil is the King Of Liars? Whoever, they never met Jo Rowling and Her Band Of Merry Mythmakers.

Saint Rowling was born, struggling to make ends meet, a lone parent traipsing through the streets of an indifferent metropolis, a waif in the storm, just like Potter. At the heart of it all of course is the romantic myth of the artist suffering for their art. This is an essential ingredient of the ‘authenticating’ myth of Rowling the artist. Van Gogh, tramp from Arles, martyr for art and love, eat your heart out, here comes Joanne Rowling… from Edinburgh… with her dole check.


To buy into the obscenity of her exaggerated plight you have to make some serious assumptions regarding it, as follows:

1) The poverty was a steady state, without reprieve, long and debilitating.
(2) She suffers from clinical depression and has been so suffering from childhood. Long enough to lead to suicidal depression.
(3) There is nobody to help her in Edinburgh.
(4) Her accommodation is unheated and uninhabitable.
(5) She has no other source of income apart from the dole.

She had no friends, no companions, no visits, no dinner over at her sister’s place - within walking distance - no social life at all. Nothing. Just free coffee and an old typewriter.


Hey, I'm all in, no way this myth could be mythological.



posted on Mar, 25 2012 @ 10:37 AM
link   
reply to post by PulsusMeusGallo
 


When you're boozing it up and chain smoking, 280 pounds/month doesn't go so far.


Jorge Arantes, deadbeat Dad, never gave a dime to help his own daughter, Sister Di's hubby runs the coffee shoppes franchise where Rowling hangs out writing to the bone, "generous friend" moves her into her rent subsidized apartment, Dad who is "inordinately proud" never humped up a quid...

I've never seen anyone so damn well hated by their own family.



posted on Mar, 25 2012 @ 10:52 AM
link   

Originally posted by HappyBunny
When the 4th HP book came out, I went to Borders to get it. I had my daughter with me, who at the time was about 4. A little old witch confronted me about it, saying that it was evil and promoted witchcraft and blah blah blah.


she was right wtry reading the thread here.


I asked her if she'd read any of them. She said no, but that's what she'd heard. She then said that I was a horrible parent for allowing my child to read it. (Again, she was 4, she couldn't read yet!) I was so angry that I told her off right there in line with about 20 other people watching. I told her she was a stupid, brainwashed Bible thumper who needs to worry about her own soul instead of mine--there's plenty there to keep her busy. I also told her that she can choose to not read it, but she has no right to dictate what I read or will allow my children to read, and to mind her own goddamned business.


then u wrote a book on how to influence peeps and all.



posted on Mar, 25 2012 @ 10:54 AM
link   

Originally posted by TwoEggz
reply to post by PulsusMeusGallo
 


When you're boozing it up and chain smoking, 280 pounds/month doesn't go so far.


Jorge Arantes, deadbeat Dad, never gave a dime to help his own daughter, Sister Di's hubby runs the coffee shoppes franchise where Rowling hangs out writing to the bone, "generous friend" moves her into her rent subsidized apartment, Dad who is "inordinately proud" never humped up a quid...

I've never seen anyone so damn well hated by their own family.


if u want to see something sickening look at the Oprah utube with and watch the two of them cry in beer about the problems of being billionheirs.



posted on Mar, 25 2012 @ 11:00 AM
link   
read the Stroy of Sam Nuldun the Philosopher or something like that. complete rowling rippoff. then she ripped off her own birthday and gave it to harry.,





top topics
 
12
<< 4  5  6    8  9  10 >>

log in

join