It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Ron Paul Tells Reporters He Is Suspicious About Results Of GOP Caucuses

page: 2
<< 1    3  4 >>

log in


posted on Mar, 12 2012 @ 09:26 PM
reply to post by MortlitantiFMMJ

By the looks of it 26 out of our 50 states have closed primaries, which is way more than I thought, and Washington DC also has closed primaries.

List of States with Open and Closed Primaries

posted on Mar, 12 2012 @ 09:50 PM
S+F for this post!

May I also recommend for additional information on how several of the caucus votes didn't tally up and how easy it has become to now tamper with the vote?

Scroll down at the above link for these two articles in particular:

posted on Mar, 12 2012 @ 10:35 PM
there is voting fraud going on right now....

i expect all shall know soon...

i pray truth is revealed...

thank you

posted on Mar, 12 2012 @ 11:06 PM
I've been suspicious of them from the start. Not conspiracy theory, just common sense. Even Santorum noticed there was funny stuff happening, and made a statement in the media about it. Not too long after he magically vaulted in the polls.

This is not something to be taken lightly, this is very serious stuff folks.
edit on 12-3-2012 by L00kingGlass because: (no reason given)

posted on Mar, 12 2012 @ 11:39 PM
reply to post by Swills

There is no question that there was fraud. In response Ron should run as an independant.

posted on Mar, 12 2012 @ 11:57 PM
if ron paul dont win i will rite in none of the above,but maybe 2012 will suprise us

posted on Mar, 13 2012 @ 12:23 AM
Great thread swills, keep shining the light!

posted on Mar, 13 2012 @ 12:50 AM
Ron Paul's rallies are typically in college towns, so of course his crowds look larger. Inexperienced voters tend to go to rallies while older voters tend to read the newspaper/watch TV/listen to radio for political news. I'm sure upwards of 33% of people at Ron Paul rallies are unregistered voters or Democrats there to see what he has to say.

There is no fraud, just a hole in the bucket, dear Eliza.

posted on Mar, 13 2012 @ 01:06 AM
reply to post by DaTroof

Very true, Ron Paul clearly hits the colleges because he so damn popular with young voters, a huge advantage for Ron Paul. The only other politician who can get the young crowd to vote for him is Obama, the other guys don't even try to campaign towards them because there is no point.

That said, all of Ron Paul's rallies are win, and he doesn't just rally at college campuses.

There's plenty more on YouTube for your viewing pleasures, I just didn't wanna create a huge wall of Video.
edit on 13-3-2012 by Swills because: (no reason given)

posted on Mar, 13 2012 @ 01:13 AM
Every day I wake up and read the bull# that goes on in this country.
Every day I die a little more inside.

What in the name of God are we going to have to do to get our country back? This is all a joke. The worst part is, its not even funny.

posted on Mar, 13 2012 @ 01:29 AM
Just waiting for the typical people to stop by this thread....but on a lighter note it seems a little concerning that for any other Candidate to pull this many people (besides Obama) they have to pay them. And maybe Obama pays but I am not sure. Maybe Goldman pays for him now since hes POTUS.
edit on 13-3-2012 by hoochymama because: (no reason given)

posted on Mar, 13 2012 @ 03:59 AM
reply to post by Swills

The crowds may have been bigger but did they all vote?

And if they did, they need to clamor to be heard if there is indeed fraud at hand.

posted on Mar, 13 2012 @ 04:01 AM
reply to post by Swills

You were asking before about the 8000 people and only 5000 votes and i do remember reading an article about this, i think it was alaska but i could be wrong... Anyway the article seems to have mysteriously vanished, but i did find a new 1 that may be even better And if you look at the related links at the bottom of that theres a couple other good ones.

posted on Mar, 13 2012 @ 05:33 AM
A line from the movie Wall Street comes to mind; "You don't really believe we live in a democracy, do you?".

posted on Mar, 13 2012 @ 07:50 AM
I had to log in for the first time in weeks to gloat...

2nd picture, third row, just to the left of the podium, and to the right of the guy in bright blue. THIS GUY.
That speech was great and the atmosphere was electrifying. I was completely shocked to find out Santorum had won by a landslide after seeing the energy in that room.

posted on Mar, 13 2012 @ 07:53 AM
post removed for serious violation of ATS Terms & Conditions

posted on Mar, 13 2012 @ 08:02 AM
reply to post by CALGARIAN

I like Ron Paul as well but logically thinking about him having 8000 attendees and only getting 5000 votes I can see a plausible answer. Lets say 8000 people attend, how many of these people are attending multiple rallies in an attempt to actually get each candidates view points before they decide who to get behind. I think that is what the purpose of these debates and rallies was originally. Maybe 4000 of these people truly were undecided and vetted all the candidates, then voted. That would mean he won an extra 1000 votes that were not already die hard Ron Paul people. I have no answer to the other points noted but I must say that good honest people who truly want whats best for our country would be the likely types to be present at one of Ron"s rallies and they are just as easily targeted and mislead by political showmanship as anyone else.

posted on Mar, 13 2012 @ 08:05 AM

off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


posted on Mar, 13 2012 @ 09:09 AM

Originally posted by Swills
reply to post by popsmayhem

That's a good thought and makes sense but I think a fair election would allow everyone to participate.

Either way, Ron Paul supporters, or any Republican supporter, probably knows if their state is closed or not, and if it is closed they hopefully registered as a Republican a long time ago. I know I did.
edit on 12-3-2012 by Swills because: (no reason given)

All issues could be settled with a vote for many large topics. However they use a two party system and you vote "maybe" for someone who will represent special interest, I'm mean our interests.

posted on Mar, 13 2012 @ 10:00 AM
I would say it is by now an established fact, we need two more politcal parties to replace the R's and the D's. Libertarian and Green are oppposite enough for most tastes. The R's and D's seem to be most all theives and dasterdly scoundrels at best. Integrity still matters to me. So if Ron doesn't run third party I will either write him in or vote Gary Johnson of the Libertarians. For those who claim these folks are for anarchy as they currently define anarchy, then I say we will prefer that verision at some point. It appears we're headed for a much more severe and uncrontrollable anarchy that will redifine those positions dramatically.

The world's population will not stand for a boot on their face too much longer from these thieves. I can only hope they don't blame us citizens of this great land for what the theives and liars have stolen from our heritage. We are still here in spirit and body to represent those things that brought hope to humanity in all corners of the Earth, personal freedom. TPTB obviously have other plans and at some point, history shows us, even these scoundrels will fall when the time comes. It is in law enforcements hands to arrest these treasonous theives and our duty will be to support them with all our will. Enough of us call this the crime it is and law enforcement will have to act. Someone with balls needs to stand up on that level, Let's realize they have to be nervous of the blowback to their own lives and family and help them anyway we can.
edit on 13-3-2012 by Justoneman because: (no reason given)

edit on 13-3-2012 by Justoneman because: (no reason given)

new topics

top topics

<< 1    3  4 >>

log in