It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Oops! Obama's Favorite Congressman Hangs With Commies (Video)

page: 4
22
<< 1  2  3    5 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 12 2012 @ 09:41 PM
link   
Obama hangs with commies?

Cool! I happen to have a friend that is an enthusiastic communist as well, and they are a blast to have at house parties!


Political ideology does not necessarily dictate what kind of person they are and I think guilt by association is a treacherous game to play.

Politics is like religion.....just because they claim to believe does not mean they live by the word!




posted on Mar, 12 2012 @ 09:42 PM
link   

Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
reply to post by clay2 baraka
 


The difference is we are a Representative Republic and the USSR was communist. Don't let the name Soviet Socialist Republic throw you. As I have explained, socialism is a bridge to communism. Any fool could see the difference between the former communist empire and America. But that is changing now under a socialist president.
edit on 12-3-2012 by ThirdEyeofHorus because: (no reason given)


I'm not a fan of either but I don't think that's a good example. I don't think socialism has ever been practiced in the manner it was conceived so there is no real example. Reason being is that it can't work. There will always be those who want to take advantage of others and have more than the rest. A fair system can't exist, it's against our scum bag nature.

Real capitalism has been practiced at about 75% the level of it's conception. That was a while back and it's true nature is only diminishing year by year now with the illusion of it still being loud and proud. I'd be thrilled to see people go from lower class to wealth through hard work and perseverance to Mitt Romney economic status because they had intelligence, a dream, a desire and a good work ethic but that borders impossible now.



posted on Mar, 12 2012 @ 09:42 PM
link   

Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
reply to post by clay2 baraka
 


The difference is we are a Representative Republic and the USSR was communist. Don't let the name Soviet Socialist Republic throw you. As I have explained, socialism is a bridge to communism. Any fool could see the difference between the former communist empire and America. But that is changing now under a socialist president.
edit on 12-3-2012 by ThirdEyeofHorus because: (no reason given)


This may not excatly be correct! It seems to me it has changed. They just waited untill the ww2 guys croaked.
Not a disagree. Just sayin it has happened, not about to happen.
Anywho look at what they present for future hopefulls.
Dem Or Repub Would you like to vote for Waldo Phead or Genghis Khan
edit on 12-3-2012 by longjohnbritches because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 13 2012 @ 12:30 AM
link   
"Socialism! Communism!"

Do you, frightened neanderthals, even know what socialism or comunism are?!

Obama and the DLC have only shown to perpetuate unrestrained capitalism, aka FASCISM.

Google the definitions of socialism, comunism, capitalism and fascism before you let others such as Rush and the corporate media do the thinking for you.

This disgusting disinfo needs to stop now. It's 2012 for god's sake!



posted on Mar, 13 2012 @ 12:48 AM
link   

Originally posted by xuenchen
Here's some more info that Chicago is proud of.

Ties to the old Soviet Union ....

and maybe even Obama & Co.


The American Communist Party was born in Chicago in 1919 and headquartered there until 1927, when its headquarters and newspaper, the Daily Worker, moved to New York. During the 1920s, Chicago's party members dealt with factionalism, reorganization, and police persecution. Before 1925, membership hovered around 2,400, organized into 36 neighborhood and union groups in the needle, metal, and building trades; printing; railroads; and food industries. Through party-organized workers' schools, foreign-language federations, fraternal organizations, and literary, youth, and theater groups, party influence extended beyond its membership. The party also fought racial discrimination in factories, and in October 1925 organized the American Negro Labor Congress to bring African Americans into the labor movement.

In the 1930s, the Communist Party in Chicago reached its largest audience through organizing the unemployed and protesting evictions and cuts in relief. Black Belt organizers recruited protesters at Washington Park, while Communists in Back of the Yards built alliances with community activists like Roman Catholic bishop Bernard Sheil and Saul Alinsky. When police killed two black workers protesting an eviction in 1931, Communists led an interracial funeral procession estimated at 60,000 by the party and 15,000 by the Chicago Daily News.
The American Communist Party


 


Communism in Chicago and the Obama Connection (pdf)

 


Chicago--Communist Paradise of the Midwest

 


Chicago Is The Birthplace of Communism In The USA

 


Socialism, Marxism, Communism & Obama

 





Have you seen this link?
letsrollforums.com...


Henry Makow is to be trusted. He posted this as an FYI and I am posting it here for the same reason. He say's the guy in the middle doesn't resemble BHO - I wrote to him and disagreed...................Its very much worth a read.............

"Is Barack Obama a KGB Agent?"
October 12, 2011


"Barack Obama with his brothers Samson and Ben in 1987 in Nairobi. I have a perfect memory and I state that I saw the man in the center of this picture in Moscow in 1987, where I've been trained at KGB Intelligence Institute."


[Editor's Note: This excerpt is from a 55-page document sent to me Tuesday by Kryzhansky, 53, left, who claims to be a former KGB Intelligence Officer and sniper. I find it confusing but worth posting for a discussion of Obams's background . The picture above, which appeared in the Daily Mail in Oct. 2009 doesn't look like Barack Obama. I have no way of knowing whether Kryzhansky is an impostor or not. The rest of the document is provocative but inconclusive. He has an youTube presence and a blog. Keep in mind, there are credible reports that Henry Kissinger was also a Soviet agent. So was Victor Rothschild (1910-1990). The KGB may be the ultimate instrument of the NWO. ]


by Mikhail Kryzhanovsky (prof7prof@yahoo.com)
(henrymakow.com)


August 4, 1961- Barack Obama was born in Honolulu, Hawaii.
If there's something very wrong with someone's birth certificate and if there's an indication that this someone used a birth certificate of a newborn child (Virginia Sunahara) who died at birth or soon after birth, we have to talk about the methods Russian intelligence (SVR, a former KGB) and its illegal espionage department. We have to talk about one of the illegal spy "documentation process" - using birth certificates to get legal documents in USA - SS#, driver license, passport.

There are two possibilities.

First is - Obama was exchanged by a professional illegal spy, because of the "birth certificate" issue (that's the #1 sign Russian illegal intelligence might be involved).

Second - Obama was recruited and trained in 1981-1983 years in Moscow ("lost" Columbia University years). Most probably, he was just recruited.

Now, let's reconstruct Obama's biography as I see it with my 30 years of espionage experience,,.continued



posted on Mar, 13 2012 @ 02:27 AM
link   
reply to post by METACOMET
 
Last time I checked the Constitution guarantees us freedom to believe in or talk about whatever we want to. YOU can BE a Communist or Socialist in this country and still be both a patriot, or a servant of the people. So please, peddle your "anti-communist" rhetoric elsewhere. All I care about my Congressmen and Senators believing in is their duty to serve me. You are casting aspersions on people whom are doing their jobs. What are you doing? Who DO YOU WORK FOR? Are you trying to start a conspiracy theory or a fight? Hail Discordia.




posted on Mar, 13 2012 @ 02:37 AM
link   

Originally posted by METACOMET
reply to post by jibeho
 


There are many congressmen and women who are open socialists and praise the doctrine of Marx.

Heck, they belong to fringe group called the Democratic Socialists of America

Senate Members
Hon. Bernie Sanders (VT)

House Members
Hon. Neil Abercrombie (HI-01)
Hon. Tammy Baldwin (WI-02)
Hon. Xavier Becerra (CA-31)
Hon. Madeleine Bordallo (GU-AL)
Hon. Robert Brady (PA-01)
Hon. Corrine Brown (FL-03)
Hon. Michael Capuano (MA-08)
Hon. André Carson (IN-07)
Hon. Donna Christensen (VI-AL)
Hon. Yvette Clarke (NY-11)
Hon. William “Lacy” Clay (MO-01)
Hon. Emanuel Cleaver (MO-05)
Hon. Steve Cohen (TN-09)
Hon. John Conyers (MI-14)
Hon. Elijah Cummings (MD-07)
Hon. Danny Davis (IL-07)
Hon. Peter DeFazio (OR-04)
Hon. Rosa DeLauro (CT-03)
Rep. Donna F. Edwards (MD-04)
Hon. Keith Ellison (MN-05)
Hon. Sam Farr (CA-17)
Hon. Chaka Fattah (PA-02)
Hon. Bob Filner (CA-51)
Hon. Barney Frank (MA-04)
Hon. Marcia L. Fudge (OH-11)
Hon. Alan Grayson (FL-08)
Hon. Luis Gutierrez (IL-04)
Hon. John Hall (NY-19)
Hon. Phil Hare (IL-17)
Hon. Maurice Hinchey (NY-22)
Hon. Michael Honda (CA-15)
Hon. Jesse Jackson, Jr. (IL-02)
Hon. Eddie Bernice Johnson (TX-30)
Hon. Hank Johnson (GA-04)
Hon. Marcy Kaptur (OH-09)
Hon. Carolyn Kilpatrick (MI-13)
Hon. Barbara Lee (CA-09)
Hon. John Lewis (GA-05)
Hon. David Loebsack (IA-02)
Hon. Ben R. Lujan (NM-3)
Hon. Carolyn Maloney (NY-14)
Hon. Ed Markey (MA-07)
Hon. Jim McDermott (WA-07)
Hon. James McGovern (MA-03)
Hon. George Miller (CA-07)
Hon. Gwen Moore (WI-04)
Hon. Jerrold Nadler (NY-08)
Hon. Eleanor Holmes-Norton (DC-AL)
Hon. John Olver (MA-01)
Hon. Ed Pastor (AZ-04)
Hon. Donald Payne (NJ-10)
Hon. Chellie Pingree (ME-01)
Hon. Charles Rangel (NY-15)
Hon. Laura Richardson (CA-37)
Hon. Lucille Roybal-Allard (CA-34)
Hon. Bobby Rush (IL-01)
Hon. Linda Sánchez (CA-47)
Hon. Jan Schakowsky (IL-09)
Hon. José Serrano (NY-16)
Hon. Louise Slaughter (NY-28)
Hon. Pete Stark (CA-13)
Hon. Bennie Thompson (MS-02)
Hon. John Tierney (MA-06)
Hon. Nydia Velazquez (NY-12)
Hon. Maxine Waters (CA-35)
Hon. Mel Watt (NC-12)
Hon. Henry Waxman (CA-30)
Hon. Peter Welch (VT-AL)
Hon. Robert Wexler (FL-19)



The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government
- Article Four of the United States Constitution



I do solemnly swear that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter: So help me God.


Sure you do.


If you're going to have the gall to post oaths and quotes from the United States Constitution, you would do well to display to us that you understand basic political science/political theory/ and perhaps some political philosophy. Your quote about a Republican form of government seems definitively irrelevant - espousing 'Democratic Party' beliefs and believing in a Republican government (i.e. one based upon the implicit consent of the people, where the people and their elected representatives hold power) are not at all mutually exclusive ideals and goals to pursue.



posted on Mar, 13 2012 @ 04:06 AM
link   
reply to post by pshea38
 


I'm familiar with it.

And it's not a bad theory.

This would certainly answer a few questions !!



posted on Mar, 13 2012 @ 04:14 AM
link   
reply to post by METACOMET
 


Judge a man based on his action not his beliefs. Bernie Sanders has fought banker fraud a hell of a lot more than most Neo-Cons. Just because you believe in a social democracy (like they have in Scandinavia... you know the happiest countries on earth) doesn't make you a communist or a bad person. Quit buying into the 1950's propaganda.



posted on Mar, 13 2012 @ 04:29 AM
link   

Originally posted by OutKast Searcher
reply to post by jibeho
 


Hopefully after 3 years of No Hope and No Change the free thinkers that gave Obama a chance in 2008 may now think twice and dig a little deeper regarding the past of the man who would be king.


Well obviously you "free thinkers" can't go against his record or policies...so you will just try the same old tired guilt by association.

The fact that you and others are pushing this angle so much just speaks volumes as to how successful Obama has been.


Obama has been extremely successful....

By bankrupting the country and making sure
the communist/czarist agendas continue to keep
their thumbs in the eyes of the majority of Americans.

Here is a list of accomplishments
that have helped the general public
in positive long lasting ways:


.....
.....
.....
[crickets] .....
.....
.....
[crickets]
.....

 



The exposure of Obama's "associates" was well documented in the 2007/2008 campaigns.

BUT, the average person simply did not believe that a
communist infiltration of such magnitude was possible.
Most passed it off as smear tactics.

We now see many of those very same "associations" actually being appointed
into high positions in the Federal Government and many have been and are very active
in legislations behind the scenes as well as upfront.

The average person (and voter) will have 2nd thoughts today.

I also find it "miraculous" that Congress can transfer money
to the selected big recipients so fast,
and then the rest of us have to
take a number and wait forever in line for "help".

In the meantime, we pay the freight on top of it !!



posted on Mar, 13 2012 @ 11:16 AM
link   

Originally posted by OutKast Searcher
McCarthyism

McCarthyism is the practice of making accusations of disloyalty, subversion, or treason without proper regard for evidence.



I thought this country got through this period a long time ago....but I guess not.


Nope. McCarthyism and Xenophobia worked so good last time we are going to go double-down on it, but with even less critical thinking this time around.



posted on Mar, 13 2012 @ 11:17 AM
link   

Originally posted by whisperindave
reply to post by METACOMET
 
Last time I checked the Constitution guarantees us freedom to believe in or talk about whatever we want to. YOU can BE a Communist or Socialist in this country and still be both a patriot, or a servant of the people. So please, peddle your "anti-communist" rhetoric elsewhere. All I care about my Congressmen and Senators believing in is their duty to serve me. You are casting aspersions on people whom are doing their jobs. What are you doing? Who DO YOU WORK FOR? Are you trying to start a conspiracy theory or a fight? Hail Discordia.



Hi quiet talking Dave

What I read in the majority of the post, is that it seem like there are a lot of Americans here that love thier country. I think they are attempting to educate folks about what is going on behind closed doors and even blatently in new repressive laws that resemble the ones stuffed down the Russian's throats by the Marxists of the former USSR. And I know you will find a lot of Russians that agree.
You know like, no freedom of religon, no freedom of speech etc.
Think of it as a free history lesson you won't get anywhere else unless you are interested in your freedom enough to persue the history on your own.
It is out there lots of it. Read some and bring it back for a talk.



posted on Mar, 13 2012 @ 11:19 AM
link   
reply to post by jibeho
 


Are we forgetting that 2 of our recent Presidential choices had a not so distant FAMILY MEMBER
who was a NAZI sympathizer and BANKER for the booty Hitler acquired looting much of Europe?

Seriously...

compare the association implications of someone who is a friend of a friend or an acquaintance...

with someone working with the NAZI 's being your frigging DAD or GRANDPA!



posted on Mar, 13 2012 @ 01:40 PM
link   
The "Guilt by association" argument is long gone.

It has now progressed to "Guilt by action".


The "actions" have rewarded the "associations" !!

The List of Loons has another "Jewel of the Nile" Obama appointee.


Kevin Jennings

Safe School Czar

The Washington Times editorializes:


Fifty-three Republican congressmen yesterday demanded that Obama fire his embattled "safe schools czar," Kevin Jennings. Mr. Jennings' bizarre sexual agenda for American grade schools is one reason the president should dump this dangerous radical.

Mr. Jennings wrote the foreword to a 1998 book titled, "Queering Elementary Education." The book he endorsed was a collection of essays by different authors who supported teaching young children about homosexuality. [color=cyan]Mr. Jennings' foreword explains why he thinks it is important to start educating children about homosexuality as early as activist-educators can get away with doing so. "Ask any elementary-school teachers you know and - if they're honest - they'll tell you they start hearing [anti-homosexual prejudice] as soon as kindergarten." And "As one third-grader put it plainly when asked by her teacher what 'gay' meant: 'I don't know. It's just a bad thing.' "

As another author in the book notes: "Any grade is 'old' enough [for the proper education] because even five-year-olds are calling each other 'gay' and 'faggot.' " Other writers claim there apparently is no problem getting into these discussions because, "The belief that children are not sexual beings is not substantiated by research."

The authors of "Queering Elementary Education" don't seem to be bothered by the dearth of evidence to justify their position in favor of teaching children about homosexual relationships. Because they do not provide the names of teachers who told various anecdotes included in the book, there's no way to check how many of the stories are secondhand exaggerations or even pure fiction.

One author in the book attacks the conservative notion that "artificial insemination, transient relationships, same-sex marriages and tangled family structures are not issues children should have to know about." Others contributors advocate that "sexual-diversity issues are central to multicultural education" and that schoolchildren should sing songs such as "In some families we have two Moms." Mind you, the authors don't provide scientific evidence that their policies accomplish the strange goals they push.

"Queering Elementary Education" argues consistently that children should be taught that same-sex-parent families are as normal and common as the traditional two-parent family or single-parent families. But it is one thing to argue certain behavior is acceptable; it is quite another to distort basic facts in an effort to change the worldview of children.
Perhaps this theory and philosophy is good for discussions between adults, but not for children, especially if parental objections are present
Mr Jennings, Obama appointee



Office of Safe and Drug Free Schools

On May 19, 2009, Obama administration Secretary of Education Arne Duncan announced Jennings' appointment as an Assistant Deputy Secretary for the Office of Safe and Drug-Free Schools ......
wikepedia references




edit on Mar-13-2012 by xuenchen because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 13 2012 @ 02:24 PM
link   

Originally posted by newcovenant
reply to post by jibeho
 


Are we forgetting that 2 of our recent Presidential choices had a not so distant FAMILY MEMBER
who was a NAZI sympathizer and BANKER for the booty Hitler acquired looting much of Europe?

Seriously...

compare the association implications of someone who is a friend of a friend or an acquaintance...

with someone working with the NAZI 's being your frigging DAD or GRANDPA!


Yeah! Old debate that was thrown around here until the end. Not the topic. Not the sitting President who is up for a lameduck dangerous reelection though. Time to illuminate all of his relationships for all to see. Many were blinded by their rose colored glasses in 2008 to see the reality of a poorly vetted and under qualified candidate landing in the White House. Three years of reality should be enough for these independent and swing voters to think twice before "giving" a vote to Obama. He sure as hell has not earned the vote.



posted on Mar, 13 2012 @ 02:41 PM
link   
reply to post by KillerQueen
 


The hundreds of millions killed under communist regimes would disgaree with you on that one. Holodomor not ring a bell ? Pol pot ? Mao ? Stalin ffs ?



posted on Mar, 13 2012 @ 07:59 PM
link   

Originally posted by Epirus

Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
reply to post by clay2 baraka
 


The difference is we are a Representative Republic and the USSR was communist. Don't let the name Soviet Socialist Republic throw you. As I have explained, socialism is a bridge to communism. Any fool could see the difference between the former communist empire and America. But that is changing now under a socialist president.
edit on 12-3-2012 by ThirdEyeofHorus because: (no reason given)


I'm not a fan of either but I don't think that's a good example. I don't think socialism has ever been practiced in the manner it was conceived so there is no real example. Reason being is that it can't work. There will always be those who want to take advantage of others and have more than the rest. A fair system can't exist, it's against our scum bag nature.

Real capitalism has been practiced at about 75% the level of it's conception. That was a while back and it's true nature is only diminishing year by year now with the illusion of it still being loud and proud. I'd be thrilled to see people go from lower class to wealth through hard work and perseverance to Mitt Romney economic status because they had intelligence, a dream, a desire and a good work ethic but that borders impossible now.


Dude, beleive him, check the history. Really just check it. Start with Carl Marx.
All political folks are s.b's when they get some power but commie folks are covert killers of anyone that threatens their obsessive quest for control.



posted on Mar, 13 2012 @ 09:37 PM
link   
reply to post by longjohnbritches
 


Holy moley
I was going to post on thes other thread by a member seabag.
It was about Marxism and Bam they just detonated it.
Wooo I think the guy said the members were going to fight.



posted on Mar, 13 2012 @ 09:41 PM
link   
So, can we get a list of how many radical and traitorous corporatists that Obama is connected to?

Hmm...oh that's right...nothing wrong with that stuff.



posted on Mar, 15 2012 @ 11:21 PM
link   

Originally posted by illuminatislave
So, can we get a list of how many radical and traitorous corporatists that Obama is connected to?

Hmm...oh that's right...nothing wrong with that stuff.



Holly molly, again,
Did this post get detonated like the other commie posts?
Did some one hit the nail on the head or get to close to the bone. waz up?



new topics

top topics



 
22
<< 1  2  3    5 >>

log in

join