good grief, its a child with a birth defect or some religious mania caused the parents to deform their child.

Yes it was more common way back when and No you don't see it every day now and that's because we now have science that corrects such deformities before they get out of hand.

Good grief sometimes I despair.

Originally posted by Versa
good grief, its a child with a birth defect or some religious mania caused the parents to deform their child.

Yes it was more common way back when and No you don't see it every day now and that's because we now have science that corrects such deformities before they get out of hand.

Good grief sometimes I despair.

according to some of the videos i watched there are quite a few skulls and possibly one attached to a 7ft skeleton.

didn't the star child skull also come from Peru

no, made a mistake it was Mexico were the star child skull was found

There are rare animals that are almost extinct and their are thousands of species that have gone extinct. Humans are not impervious to the pattern.

There were dozens of different kind of human in the past. Many went extinct. The mummy and oddities found in south america and around the world could explain this.

Sorry, no aliens. Human. Always has been. What a lost history we have.

It looks to me like they are getting us ready for disclosure, releasing interesting bits of information slowly getting us warmed up to the idea that "they" exist.........then again I could be totally wrong and this could be fake

Originally posted by haven123

The bones found in Andahuaylillas belong to two children aged between zero and 3 years old, and not "aliens", as noted archaeologist Rene Davila.

The skeletal remains of Andean Rituals private museum in the district of Andahuaylillas, Cuzco, corresponding to two pre-Hispanic infants undergoing cranial deformation processes, which belies the anthropologist Renato Davila, who had noted that the mummy belonged to "beings aliens ", but later recanted.


Anthropologist Elva Torres, head of the Office of Physical Anthropology of the Regional Directorate of Culture, Cusco, reported that the first individual corresponds to a child who has lost the lower post mortem.

The skull, said the expert-type strain shows ring and you can see traces of the deformed pads frontal and occipital bone and the marks left by deforming the parietal bands.

In addition, the specialist explained that as a result of cranial deformation, orbital cavities were enlarged and still see part of the eyeball in the right orbit. The infant had died after three or four years.

Regarding the cranial sutures, said they are in the process of closing, including the fontanelle, a process occurs in childhood but may last longer depending on many factors.

According to a local newspaper, regarding the second skeleton, corresponds to a baby from zero to one years and has the incomplete skull and found that only parietal and occipital bones articulated to the rear of the skull.

The archaeologist said Sunday that the distortion Farfan prehispanic skull were made with small tables, molds and headbands for children under three years in various towns of Tahuantinsuyo as an indicator of social status or as a mark of a religious nature.

(I dont know how to quote text sorry)

edit on 13-3-2012 by haven123 because: (no reason given)

Quoting this for people who may have missed it. Sometimes reading the whole thread before posting "ITZ AN ALIEN!!1!" helps.

For those screeching that it was a baby, and therefore could not have had teeth, dear god, google "NATAL TEETH" and learn about it. I'm almost incredulous that you haven't heard of this. Yes, babies can be born with some, to a full set of, chompers. Not common, but it definitely happens. I'm not even remotely sure how common being born with third molars/wisdom teeth is (let alone how common early eruption of them is) but I would imagine that if Junior is born with teeth, Junior might pop the molars early as well.