Help ATS with a contribution via PayPal:
learn more

Bizarre Mummy With Giant Head Discovered In Peru

page: 6
48
<< 3  4  5    7 >>

log in

join

posted on Mar, 13 2012 @ 07:04 PM
link   
www.abovetopsecret.com...
its debunked on this thread it has dna from two humans????
and even more specificly here.www.larepublica.pe...
google translate it if you cant read it.
edit on 13-3-2012 by haven123 because: (no reason given)




posted on Mar, 13 2012 @ 07:21 PM
link   

Originally posted by Arken
reply to post by chr0naut
 




This appears to be the skull of an infant that died either during, or just after, childbirth.


A childbirth with..theet? With Molars?


Hmm... may be, but if so, than, probably,.... NOT HUMAN!


The only thing possibly identifiable as a tooth appears to be removed and hanging from the upper jaw. The photo is very poor quality and there is insufficient detail to unambiguously identify it as a tooth. It also appears to be significantly rotated, if it is a tooth, which leads me to believe that it is in fact some sort of tag stuck to the skull and not a tooth.

edit on 13/3/2012 by chr0naut because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 13 2012 @ 07:30 PM
link   

The bones found in Andahuaylillas belong to two children aged between zero and 3 years old, and not "aliens", as noted archaeologist Rene Davila.

The skeletal remains of Andean Rituals private museum in the district of Andahuaylillas, Cuzco, corresponding to two pre-Hispanic infants undergoing cranial deformation processes, which belies the anthropologist Renato Davila, who had noted that the mummy belonged to "beings aliens ", but later recanted.


Anthropologist Elva Torres, head of the Office of Physical Anthropology of the Regional Directorate of Culture, Cusco, reported that the first individual corresponds to a child who has lost the lower post mortem.

The skull, said the expert-type strain shows ring and you can see traces of the deformed pads frontal and occipital bone and the marks left by deforming the parietal bands.

In addition, the specialist explained that as a result of cranial deformation, orbital cavities were enlarged and still see part of the eyeball in the right orbit. The infant had died after three or four years.

Regarding the cranial sutures, said they are in the process of closing, including the fontanelle, a process occurs in childhood but may last longer depending on many factors.

According to a local newspaper, regarding the second skeleton, corresponds to a baby from zero to one years and has the incomplete skull and found that only parietal and occipital bones articulated to the rear of the skull.

The archaeologist said Sunday that the distortion Farfan prehispanic skull were made with small tables, molds and headbands for children under three years in various towns of Tahuantinsuyo as an indicator of social status or as a mark of a religious nature.

(I dont know how to quote text sorry)
edit on 13-3-2012 by haven123 because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 13 2012 @ 07:32 PM
link   
reply to post by haven123
 


Thanks for the link. I was right, they manipulated the original by reducing the width to exaggerate the elongation.



posted on Mar, 13 2012 @ 07:36 PM
link   
reply to post by Blaine91555
 


i cant take credit for that just every one was seemingly overlooking the original thread posted by Trueman.Thank him
edit on 13-3-2012 by haven123 because: (no reason given)
edit on 13-3-2012 by haven123 because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 13 2012 @ 08:17 PM
link   
I find it funny, skeptics ask for evidence of ET, we give them solid proof with starchild & now hundreds of other skulls THAT FUNNILY ENOUGH LOOK EXACTLY LIKE GRAYS, skulls which coincidentally look exactly like the grays skulls which people have been reporting & talking about before the skulls was even discovered around the world in ...ancient sites, which we struggle to explain how they was made with such primitive technology and in most cases we know it WAS IMPOSSIBLE for them to have achived, yet oh we must have forgotten or lost technology along the way, yeah suuuuure we did, if they could do it so can we, simple as that, no cave man is ever going to out smart a civilization which can reach the moon for christ sakes.. but we couldn't and still today couldn't build those structures because we don't have the technology to be moving round 200.000 ton blocks in the desert, in facts its 5 times more then what the largest land cranes on earth can move today yet they did it with wood & vines lol, they talk of sun gods & angels who helped them build them and knew incredible things about astrology of which we only just rediscovered recently or a hundred years ago, they are more precise pieces of engineering than that of the most expensive bits of technology today such as large telescopes etc, yet they knocked the socks of that precision engineering with god dam "copper tools"

I have to ask some people... REALLY? really? well, you just carry on burring your heads in the sand

whether this skull is or not, there are others out there THAT ARE NOT! deformations, even the kings & queens used to deform there own skulls, and you can spot them a mile of.. why did they do that? well they say they did it to look like "the sun gods" geez i mean what more do you want, who was the sun gods? yes exactly ET grays


The evidence is out there for all to access, they're not going to tell you, you need to go study it for your self, the evidence is overwhelming & obvious, people just choose to ignore it, or wait for there superiors to tell them they can believe in such things now, its ok scared little sheep you can tell yourself its real now...



posted on Mar, 13 2012 @ 08:41 PM
link   

Originally posted by haven123
reply to post by thorfourwinds
 

thread derailment like this is going to get it closed
edit on 13-3-2012 by haven123 because: (no reason given)
edit on 13-3-2012 by haven123 because: itchy ballsack

Greetings:

If we wanted to fall into that obvious trap, we might ask who made you thread traffic cop? :shk: But we won't and it doesn't matter.

We never intended to offend your sensibilities, for sure.

However, if you were paying attention, the thread was debunked (therefore, for all intents and purposes, derailed) by Trueman on Page 2, and perhaps should have been closed and redirected to Trueman's thread (which is generally the case), and we were merely replying to esteemed member kawika with our offering of ancestor probabilities, almost a full day after the thread was dead.

However, mired in your insatiable lust for stars, that knowledge evidently did not stop you from milking the thread and even inferring that esteemed member gort51 said infants have wisdom teeth and fins, which, of course, he didn't.



reply to post by gort51
infants dont have wisdom teeth or a fin



Introspection

Peace Love Light
tfw
[align=center][color=magenta]Liberty & Equality or Revolution[/align]



posted on Mar, 13 2012 @ 08:50 PM
link   
reply to post by thorfourwinds
 


thank you



posted on Mar, 14 2012 @ 05:17 AM
link   

Originally posted by LoveisanArt
reply to post by Flavian
 


To all the birth defect excuses and claims... You people were not alive thousands of years ago when humanity wasnt F***ucked up on drugs, Genetically modified food, fear and all the nasty stuff our bodies intake on a daily basis.. Sure birth defects could be plausiable but LEAST plausiable to me. Anything that is alien or sub-terranean is automatically a defected human ?? What do you people know about anatomy of ET/SU-T beings ? Keep an open mind will yea, our Et families of the cosmos are most luckily going to be here this year, you gonna deny when you see one too ?


Not really sure where to start with this to be honest. As you seem totally unwilling to grasp that human birth defects are as old as humanity and also totally natural, and therefore it must be aliens instead, there seems to be no point actually discussing this with you. This has been conclusively debunked.

Most on ATS do not debunk for the fun of it, rather to get rid of ridiculous claims so that the unexplained that is left can be properly examined. Most of us here would love for there to be conclusive proof of life from other parts of the universe - that makes exposing the sham claims even more important.



posted on Mar, 14 2012 @ 05:42 PM
link   
That's what iI've been saying since page 2 of this thread. I would be embarassed if I was the op, he seemed to ignore my post and kept it going.


Looks like some people would do anything for a flag
edit on 14-3-2012 by Trueman because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 14 2012 @ 05:44 PM
link   
A dislike for simple answers, a lack of attendance at a Physical Anthroplogy 200 class, and an overage of belief leads to threads like this......



posted on Mar, 14 2012 @ 06:08 PM
link   

Originally posted by Hanslune
A dislike for simple answers, a lack of attendance at a Physical Anthroplogy 200 class, and an overage of belief leads to threads like this......


Got that right brother. Forgot to mention the need of protagonism.



posted on Mar, 14 2012 @ 06:17 PM
link   

Originally posted by haven123
reply to post by Blaine91555
 


i cant take credit for that just every one was seemingly overlooking the original thread posted by Trueman.Thank him
edit on 13-3-2012 by haven123 because: (no reason given)
edit on 13-3-2012 by haven123 because: (no reason given)


Thank you brother, I'm happy to see how truth prevails at the end. Sadly, damage has been done by this thread and some members got a bad stigma now.



posted on Mar, 14 2012 @ 06:26 PM
link   

Originally posted by Manhater
Well we already know, everyone is going to call it a hoax or a fake.

Dang those eyes look big.



GRANDMA WHAT BIG EYES YOU'VE GOT !




edit on 14-3-2012 by neotech1neothink because: edit code



posted on Mar, 14 2012 @ 06:44 PM
link   
reply to post by thorfourwinds
 


Thank you. One more thing I didn't say yet : I sent a U2U to a mod, but the thread kept going till now.



posted on Mar, 14 2012 @ 06:59 PM
link   
reply to post by Chadwickus
 


wisdom teeth on a 2 yo child?



posted on Mar, 14 2012 @ 07:13 PM
link   
They're basically saying it's not a Human Being.

Baby steps folks. We will eventually find out our true identities and ancestral roots one of these millennium. As soon as science and church take a back seat.

It just seems the more we uncover (about our past) the more stuck we stay! There is very little doubt that our history is completely wrong and most likely been fabricated by institutions, science and church as a means to control us.
Pretty pathetic.

Like Pye says: Everything You Know Is Wrong!

S&F



posted on Mar, 14 2012 @ 07:27 PM
link   

Originally posted by Human_Alien
Like Pye says: Everything You Know Is Wrong!

S&F


....then that means Pye is wrong too!

Agreed that religion is not a good tool to use to understand the past, making stuff up doesn't work either so you are pretty much left with science
edit on 14/3/12 by Hanslune because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 14 2012 @ 07:31 PM
link   

Originally posted by Hanslune

Originally posted by Human_Alien
Like Pye says: Everything You Know Is Wrong!

S&F


....then that means Pye is wrong too!



Lloyd Pye gives alternative theories.
Science, religion and schools purportedly give 'facts'.

Big difference m'friend



posted on Mar, 14 2012 @ 07:33 PM
link   

Originally posted by Human_Alien

Originally posted by Hanslune

Originally posted by Human_Alien
Like Pye says: Everything You Know Is Wrong!

S&F


....then that means Pye is wrong too!



Lloyd Pye gives alternative theories.
Science, religion and schools purportedly give 'facts'.

Big difference m'friend


Religion gives belief, rarely facts

Science gives up evidence based on observation and experimentation

Pye makes stuff up

Big difference m'friend





new topics

top topics



 
48
<< 3  4  5    7 >>

log in

join