It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by TomServo
Originally posted by Arken
Originally posted by Hellas
reply to post by Arken
May be just a hydrocephalus..
And Macro Oculus, Triangular Cranium, all combined and mixed in one.
...and we just happened to find that one, eh? Out of all the Peruvians ever burried and lost, a vastly rare combination of deformations happened to be preserved, and found... Thats equally plausible as it being extraterrestrial!edit on 13-3-2012 by TomServo because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by SmertSpionam1
reply to post by Arken
Is this mummy an adult or child? The reason I ask is the opening at the top of the head would be normal for a new born child, that being said, it would be the only thing normal about that skull. Me thinks it's a child skeleton of what I do not know?
Originally posted by Chadwickus
reply to post by Arken
Nothing of human. Nothing of known.
Not what the anthropologist says.
He says it's a child under 2 years old with an enormous head.
Don;t see how that stops it being human...
Most kids have their first set of teeth by the time they are 3 years old. ... Between the ages of 17 and 21, four more teeth called wisdom teeth usually grow in
Originally posted by LoveisanArt
Anything that is alien or sub-terranean is automatically a defected human ??
The prevalence of spina bifida from Fishergate House (9%) was similar to that from the medieval monastic cemetery at Hull Magistrates Court (Holst et al forthcoming), where 10% of individuals excavated were found to have this condition. At Blackfriars, the prevalence was only 7%, while it was even lower at St Andrews, where 4% of individuals were affected. However, at Towton, the prevalence was considerably higher than at Fishergate House, with 24%. A prevalence of 5 to 25% spina bifida occulta in a population is considered normal.