It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Become A Time-Traveler

page: 1

log in


posted on Mar, 12 2012 @ 06:10 AM
Space-time coordinates are based on imprints, which have static time-lines associated with the frequency of that particular reality-model. Every individual reality-model has its own frequency, which means its own time-line, or velocity of the passing of time. Time is entirely relative to a particular reality-model. Those who cling to their imprinted reality-model stay within that one frequency, that one space-time velocity, and therefore inhabit reality-islands populated with other individuals who share the same frequency. An individual who transcends hir imprinted reality-model, and understands the process of imprinting and its associated relativity, could somewhat metaphorically, although fairly accurately from a technical standpoint, be called a time-traveller. This is because SHe is able to witness various reality-models and their associated time-lines, and “travel” between them.

At this point, it becomes important to detach from your accumulated concepts of time, and your understanding of the location in space-time which you dwell. Consider the various stages in the progression of your relationships with all of the individuals in your life throughout the time that you have lived. Consider potential future developments which could occur. If time is entirely relative, and we all inhabit our own time-lines, then it is a logical deduction that one should not give in to any negative emotional state in response to any interpersonal connection which is not guaranteed to be consistent throughout all time. Needless to say, this also holds true for personal problems. It seems most, if not all, negative feelings stem from our understanding of time. “I miss the way things used to be.” When you understand the relativity of time, this is no longer a valid concern. Say you’re having difficulty linking up with another individual in the way you would like. With understanding of relative time-lines, this is no longer an issue. Say you’re impatient for something that you look forward to in the future. Not an issue, without a static time-line. Can you see how the concept of one static time-line is the cause of perhaps all of our perceived problems?

posted on Mar, 12 2012 @ 07:01 AM
Changing one's "time line" might seem relatively plausible if one doesn't consider the physical nature of progressive ramification. Imagine a pool table, and what occurs on that table during the course of a typical game of 9-ball. Halfway through that game, imagine trying to unwind the entirety of progressive ramification of that entire game as it's gathered to that point. Where would you start and how would you track it all back to the breaking of the rack? Or maybe you only want to unwind it all until a specific point where you screwed up.

Let's say that the reason you wanted to unwind the game, was to change a decision that you made 5 balls into your own progression of play. Let's imagine that you could accomplish the unwind to that specific point in the game. What say does your opponent have in the matter? After all, it's a game that involves two players. How do you reconcile the fact that your advantage in this causal manipulation is his/her disadvantage. Also, how do you prevent him/her from unwinding your correction to negate your own advantage once you've allowed the progressive ramification to resume once again?

Also, what is the impact - historically speaking - of the unwind process itself, as well as the introduction of the brand new trajectory/continuum that's been initiated. And what happens to the default informational trajectory that emerged as a result of the first historical version of the game? It can't cease to be a fact that those shots were made and that the ramifications of those shots existed. Maybe you can reset all the balls in the exact locations as if those shots were never made, but the facts exist concerning those shots and the ramifications of those shots. In fact, the only reality concerning those shots that will persist IS the facts surrounding those shots and the ramifications of those shots having happened. You can't eliminate the fact that those shots did occur.

And if a simple 9-ball game - limited to one pool table - can present an intractable logical issue that makes unwinding the ramifications of your 5th shot in the game literally impossible, then what makes you think that a person can unwind the direct and progressive ramifications of their own complete timeline or even cut that timeline off and initiate a brand new one that injects itself into the ongoing progression of an entire multi-layer web of competing and conflicting timelines that are already fully developed?

Just making the claim isn't the same as calculating the impact on that established time line matrix or the potentially catastrophic logical ramifications of cutting off a causal trajectory - with a full informational continuum associated with it that's already integrally woven within the informational continuums of who knows how many other timelines; establishing the allowable potentials for the associated progressive trajectories (other people's ongoing timeline) - especially in a very crowded world full of human beings that have lives that literally lean against other lives as they all make their way forward from instant to instant. How do you ever factor in the domino effect of even the smallest rewind? I don't think that even if it's possible to "jump timelines" that there's a way of preventing a major catastrophe caused by the direct ramification chain that would be initiated.

Ever wonder why no one's ever accomplished this? Do you really think it's because no one's ever considered it as a notion before you considered it? Or that they just didn't believe hard enough in the plausibility of the premise? Get a pencil and a piece of paper, and try factoring out how to unwind a game of 9-ball - including how to eliminate the informational ramifications of each and every movement of each ball - back to the instant before breaking the rack. That's relatively easy compared to unwinding a single hour of a person's time line.

Then, sketch out your proposal for physically freeing yourself from the Planck's Constant that cements you into your own time line, and prevents you from ever altering the unitary base rate of change that rules your entire existence.

When you've done all that, then come on back and let's have a look at your homework.

edit on 3/12/2012 by NorEaster because: (no reason given)

posted on Mar, 12 2012 @ 07:26 AM
If we really could time travel, I bet things could really get messed up. History would be constantly changing and futures re written. Not to mention everyone would win the lottery all the time.

posted on Mar, 12 2012 @ 08:53 AM
reply to post by shell310

Not necessarily. What you just said is what most people believe would happen but what if every time something changed in the past, it created a new time-line that branched off and so leaving the current one completly intact. Lets face it, one day time travel will be possible. And if its possible in the future then that means somebody has probably already come back in time. Which would mean time travel has always existed. There could be billions of different time-lines running parallel with each other.
Using this theory i think it is alot easier to imagine how other dimensions would work and what may be happening when people report having a time-slip ect. Just my take on it.

top topics

log in