It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Proof of Alien Artifacts on the Moon. This might be huge.

page: 3
<< 1  2    4  5 >>

log in


posted on Mar, 12 2012 @ 09:51 AM
i went full screen....and at 47 or so sec in the lower left hand there is a square trench in the bottom of a crater...
its four sided and looks too artificial to have natural cause.
Is this what yu refer to as proof?
the rest of the video i couldnt see thaat well on my laptop, but that first artifact was major.....

posted on Mar, 12 2012 @ 09:53 AM
sorry but this was waste of my time, usa, russia, china, india, eu and japan all sent probes and orbiters to the moon and there was no evidence of artificial structures.
China's space agency released an amazingly detailed map of the moon -

posted on Mar, 12 2012 @ 10:07 AM
reply to post by boncho

Maybe Zorro has been on the moon?

Shhhhh, you're blowing my cover!

posted on Mar, 12 2012 @ 10:34 AM
Sorry dude but i don't see anything,welcome to ats though.

posted on Mar, 12 2012 @ 10:49 AM
reply to post by Chadwickus

I see the shadow that got a few "excited".

But, looking about the area, I see other very long shadows as well. Look to the left (west).

Boulders, even medium-high ones, can cast very, very long shadows when the Sun is low on the horizon. (In this case, presuming 'up' is North, the setting Sun).

The apparent/y "incredibly long" shadow could simply be the result of the surface it is being cast on --- that surface could have a very slight and gradual down slope, away from the prominence, thus elongating the shadow in the manner seen.

Here's an example from Earth:

And, that is on a flat surface. We are familiar with a Human, and an average height of a Human, so we see nothing "unusual" in that photo. Yet, the average Human's height is well exaggerated in the shadow.

Look at this:

....or this:

And countless other examples.

Until there is another view of that same area, with different lighting conditions, and preferably at an oblique angle, this claim of a "tower" must be tempered with caution. Jumping to conclusions is not a scientific method.

posted on Mar, 12 2012 @ 10:49 AM
reply to post by kita0dtita

only food for thought but dont beleive EVERYTHING your government tells you

posted on Mar, 12 2012 @ 10:54 AM
any video with that ridiculous sound track in it is CLEARLY a fake or a youtuber desperate for more channel views

posted on Mar, 12 2012 @ 11:07 AM
I spotted a Grey Alien carved into the lunar.

But thats all I spotted you weren't very clear on what we was looking for at what stages of that video.

posted on Mar, 12 2012 @ 11:11 AM
reply to post by ProudBird

Sure, shadow length not equals height.
Nevertheless, this looks odd.
This shadow is much longer than every boulder's shadow I found in this pic.
Furthermore, it reaches out of a shadow area and seems to be more reflective/shiny then the surrounding.

posted on Mar, 12 2012 @ 11:28 AM
reply to post by grobi77 reaches out of a shadow area and seems to be more reflective/shiny then the surrounding. seems to "pop" out at the viewer precisely because of the very low angle of the Sun.

It is a prominence of some sort....but does not need to be "50 meters" high, as the OP suggested. It "pops" out to a viewer because it is high enough to be catching the late Lunar "dusk" sunlight, as the Sun sets to the West. Everything else is in shadow, but that little peak is still in sunlight, and so is very obvious.

This same sort of effect has been noted elsewhere, in similar lighting conditions, on the Moon. There have been other ATS threads on the appearance of such things.

This is why there needs to be more examples, taken at different times of the Lunar "day".

This video compiled several images of one location (the Apollo 11 landing site) with multiple angles of sunlight illuminating the clearly illustrates the way the shadows can throw off perceptions:

posted on Mar, 12 2012 @ 11:38 AM
Come on ATS thats 8 minutes im not getting back!


Im sure there are ancient structures on the moon i have seen a couple of convincing pictures in the past.

But I saw nothing in that video.

The only structures I saw were the big red squares he was putting on.

In fact this deserves:

posted on Mar, 12 2012 @ 11:46 AM
Op i clearly saw what it was you wanted to show right away, so you did right in that part.

Proudbird has explaned what i wanted to say about the "antenna", so no need for me to do that again.
The word "even" also stood out to me before you put the sqares around, i must have a good eye i guess.

If it is a word or a coincidence of rock formation, well...i don't know, i would go for the second

Good job, and looking forward to see what else you can come up with

A little tip: Be carefull with the word "Proof"

edit on 12-3-2012 by Mianeye because: (no reason given)

posted on Mar, 12 2012 @ 12:53 PM
the number of feet or meters per pixel in the original image is crucial to interpreting what you see.
Some past postings point to structure like things on the moon that would be a mile high if one counted the pixels from apparent base to top. seems unlikely to be true.
So i put these great discoveries as photo enhancement artifacts til we have the pixel size and original images.

posted on Mar, 12 2012 @ 01:18 PM
I love how oxymoronic the title is. "Proof" and "might" in the same sentence. Just..... wow

posted on Mar, 12 2012 @ 01:22 PM
Again......what is that square shaped excavation in the crater at 45 ec in....?the crater ia about mid to lower left.....anyone else see anything un natural about it....looks like minimg exploration digging
What can you do to blow it up OP?

posted on Mar, 12 2012 @ 01:30 PM
reply to post by Gwampo

you should really be better than to judge something by if it has music or not, i'd much rather hear some #ty porn music or theatrical violins than silence or clicking alone. it sounds to me like he just might know what he's talking about but im not and most others posting dont have the specific knowledge to say one way or the other. MAYBE he thought he would have some real intelligent people that knew what they were talking about reply and not a bunch of wannabe cool guys sitting on fu**ing high horses about how many smartass posts they can make.

posted on Mar, 12 2012 @ 01:44 PM
reply to post by PINGi14

i want my 4 minutes of life back .

note to anyone else reading this : don't waste your time with the video.

posted on Mar, 12 2012 @ 01:54 PM
I saw the antenna shadow.

And a coca-cola bottle.

Welcome to ATS.

posted on Mar, 12 2012 @ 01:58 PM
reply to post by stirling

If you are referring to the crater with the vaguely "squarish" lines in it?

Those appear to be collapsed lava tubes. Just a first guess, from that distance hard to be certain. Remember the scale that we are looking at.

Perhaps when someone can identify that crater by name, then one can look it up either online for more info, or at a local library where they will have a large Moon Atlas to review.


Reference this later POST, from the next page.

Looks like what you were referring?
edit on Mon 12 March 2012 by ProudBird because: (no reason given)

posted on Mar, 12 2012 @ 01:59 PM
reply to post by Chadwickus

If you look at the "rocks" scattered around the image, you will see they are casting the same shadows.
The object in question with the longer shadow looks to do located on a slope/hill of some kind. I would assume it is just a rock with a longer shadow due to its physical location on the surface of the moon.

new topics

top topics

<< 1  2    4  5 >>

log in