It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by OutKast Searcher
reply to post by something wicked
Hi Outkast,
While I respect your opinion, I can't agree with it. The right or not to have the right to abortion shouldn't even be a political matter - are you saying that areas of society are not allowed to have an opinion on this? Why is religion any different from any other part of society? Tax exemption from what I understand is given to all recognised religions, and of course anyone or business that qualifies - do none of them have a right to a voice, even if it is not agreed with?
First off...this isn't a discussion about abortion no matter what Fox News says.
Second...all tax exempt organizations have rules to follow. You can disagree with me all you want...but it is the law.
www.irs.gov...
All IRC section 501(c)(3) organizations, including churches
and religious organizations, must abide by certain rules:
■ their net earnings may not inure to any private
shareholder or individual,
■ they must not provide a substantial benefit to private
interests,
■ they must not devote a substantial part of their
activities to attempting to influence legislation,
■ they must not participate in, or intervene in, any
political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to)
any candidate for public office, and
■ the organization’s purposes and activities may not
be illegal or violate fundamental public policy.
Originally posted by Under Water
I really have to question the logic behind some of you.
Problem: People are poor so they can't afford certain health related things.
Cause: They don't have jobs or, enough hours/pay.
Solution: Take from the rest of the population that does have, and use them to pay for the poor. Since they are poor, they should be given free money.
Accepted Risk: Much of the middle class may be taxed into poverty, with the possibility of the middle class becoming extinct all together. As tax funds dwindle, the country will borrow more and more, and only pay out less and less to the poor. This solution will not help move people out of poverty, but will only prove to keep them in it and it will become a way of life for them.
Originally posted by Under Water
Seems to me it should go more like this:
Problem: People are poor so they can't afford certain health related things.
Cause: They don't have jobs or, enough hours/pay.
Solution: Put them to work by creating more jobs. Decrease taxes to boost the economy. Businesses will need to hire more people to keep up with the booming economy, and supply vs demand dictate that a wages will go up to keep up with the competition due to so many job openings that businesses need to fill.
Accepted Risk: More people with jobs. The poor can be removed from poverty and become part of the middle class. Those who pay taxes will pay less. The government will no longer need to borrow and will once again have a surplus, and be the economic leader of the world.
Originally posted by Under Water
The logic that it is ok to kill unborn members of the human race because it's cheaper to kill them now than support them later is an example of a less evolved mind. Your thinking is flawed. There are better ways than murder to solve our money issues. Murder should never be accepted. It should never be an option. We as a society should be above that kind of thinking. The human race still has so very far to go on the evolutionary scale. I am ashamed to be living among humans who think it's all perfectly ok. And who hide behind a veil of "women's rights" to justify their claims.
So you are saying that in the land of the free, some organisations are not allowed a voice, is that what you are saying? Disregard the video the OP provided, that is an individuals opinion. Are you saying that any group which represents part of a community is not allowed to voice its opinion? If you do believe that is fit and proper, well, good luck to you.
Originally posted by colbe
BHO has no power to, no right to force people to go against their conscience. He promised the American bishops three years ago at his
election, he would not touch do this and now he has.
Originally posted by SilentKillah
You're failing to realize that many people don't see a fetus as a human, thus it is not murder. Something cannot be killed if it is not alive. I respect your view on a fetus, but I disagree. Fact is there's no adequate proof to show either way. Until someone can tell us what it was like to live as a pea sized being inside of a womb, it's not murder.
Given the influence that religion has over this country, I highly doubt it.
Originally posted by OutKast Searcher
All I know is that if the Catholic Church keeps talking politics, in and out of their churches, they are going to have their tax exempt status stripped from them.
I personally believe they are very close to that line already.
The thing is, most "catholics" don't even support what the leadership is arguing about...so this really isn't a battle between Obama and all catholics...it is Obama vs the Vatican.
Originally posted by OutKast Searcher
reply to post by something wicked
So you are saying that in the land of the free, some organisations are not allowed a voice, is that what you are saying? Disregard the video the OP provided, that is an individuals opinion. Are you saying that any group which represents part of a community is not allowed to voice its opinion? If you do believe that is fit and proper, well, good luck to you.
I believe all individuals should have a voice...and every individual that attends a church is free to have a voice and an opinion.
I don't believe a church should have a collective voice that influences our government.
Originally posted by corsair00
Quantity of Life VS. Quality of Life.
Apparently the Catholics want an overpopulated world full of starving and miserable people so that they can have more converts. By the way, EVERYTHING is alive and has a soul. Every plant, animal and even every living cell. Are there plans in place to save every single sperm that men ejaculate?
Under the new policy to be announced today, women will have free preventive care that includes contraceptive services no matter where she works. The policy also ensures that if a woman works for a religious employer with objections to providing contraceptive services as part of its health plan, the religious employer will not be required to provide, pay for or refer for contraception coverage
Insurance companies will be required to provide contraception coverage to these women free of charge.
Originally posted by corsair00
Quantity of Life VS. Quality of Life.
Apparently the Catholics want an overpopulated world full of starving and miserable people so that they can have more converts. By the way, EVERYTHING is alive and has a soul. Every plant, animal and even every living cell. Are there plans in place to save every single sperm that men ejaculate?
You're failing to realize that many people don't see a fetus as a human, thus it is not murder.
Something cannot be killed if it is not alive. I respect your view on a fetus, but I disagree.
Fact is there's no adequate proof to show either way.
Until someone can tell us what it was like to live as a pea sized being inside of a womb, it's not murder.
Sorry, that doesn't work. In an ideal situation, yeah I know, but bear with me, the individual alone has little voice, hence becoming part of a collective, in this case a religious organisation. Would you also say unions should have no voice? How about charities?
Thus, a section 501(c)(5) organization may further its exempt purposes through lobbying as its primary activity without jeopardizing its exempt status. However, a section 501(c)(5) organization that engages in lobbying may be required to either provide notice to its members regarding the percentage of dues paid that are applicable to lobbying activities or pay a proxy tax.
...
A section 501(c)(5) labor or agricultural organization may engage in some political activities, however, so long as that is not its primary activity. However, any expenditures it makes for political activities may be subject to tax under section 527(f).
Originally posted by popsmayhem
Originally posted by colbe
BHO has no power to, no right to force people to go against their conscience. He promised the American bishops three years ago at his
election, he would not touch do this and now he has.
The people were warned what he was up too.
He said a lot of things and went back on them.
Surprise me at all? No
More draconian laws.
Now it is birth control, next it will be abortion..
How great they would feel if they were
to force their control over the catholic church
to fund abortions..
I have posted twice in another thread the page in Obama Care that speaks of the implantation of the micro-chip. Leftists do not reply.