Will these supposed Aliens return in Dec 21st?

page: 1
7
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join

posted on Mar, 11 2012 @ 07:52 AM
link   
According to the new series of Ancient Aliens, the Aliens called "Annunaki" will return on some time around Dec 21st 2012- Jan 21st 2013. the Ancient alien fanatics interpret this as the return of the Aliens. Erich Von Daniken, lead founder of the "Ancient alien theory"...is 100% positive that the "Alien gods" will return in the next following months. That is why the government is advertising all of this alien crud on TV. I don't know, what are your thoughts on this, BS or truth?. (The Mayans did not even have the wheel, but yet they were at least 100 years more advanced than any other culture, still barbaric though.). I am still semi-new to the English writing system,I hope my grammar is not too sloppy.

Dec 21st 2012.

Return of the "Annunaki"?.

Doomsday?

Or an average winter solstice?.

-Erich Von Daniken.
In every religious story, the "Gods" always have a promise to return in a far away future.




posted on Mar, 11 2012 @ 07:56 AM
link   
reply to post by cowDrinker
 


i thought you are fed up with Ufos and stuff?
Time will tell us..we`ll be there before you know it.
When they not come this year or in the beginning of the next year..than i say "# you aliens"
edit on 11-3-2012 by Anunaki2012 because: (no reason given)
edit on 11-3-2012 by Anunaki2012 because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 11 2012 @ 08:01 AM
link   
reply to post by Anunaki2012
 


Ancient aliens is not "UFO stuff" it is a discussion of whether man has been visited by ancient astronauts.



posted on Mar, 11 2012 @ 08:02 AM
link   
reply to post by cowDrinker
 


i know i watched it,,



posted on Mar, 11 2012 @ 08:04 AM
link   
It is indeed BS, because there is no such thing as the Anunnaki, "Nibiru/Planet X", or alien overlords. December 21st will be a normal day like any other.



posted on Mar, 11 2012 @ 08:05 AM
link   
reply to post by paradox
 


how can you know? I mean not Nibiru..but Anunaki what about the sumerian history?



posted on Mar, 11 2012 @ 08:05 AM
link   
reply to post by paradox
 


Well at least you were honest about it :-D.



posted on Mar, 11 2012 @ 08:13 AM
link   
reply to post by Anunaki2012
 


The Anunnaki depiction is a fictitious work of Zecharia Sitchin. His 'translations' of Sumerian texts were completely inaccurate and twisted in order to create the story he wanted to create. I think the "Criticisms" section on his wikipedia page says it better than I can.


When Sitchin wrote his books only specialists could read the Sumerian language, but sources such as the 2006 book Sumerian Lexicon[19] have made the language more accessible to non-experts. Ancient language scholar Michael S. Heiser[20] states that he has found many inaccuracies in Sitchin's translations and challenges interested parties to use this book to check their validity.[15][21] Prof. Ronald H. Fritze,[22] author of the book Invented Knowledge: False History, Fake Science and Pseudo-religions,[22] mentions the example of Sitchin's claim that the Sumerian sign Din-Gir means "pure ones of the blazing rockets", adding that "Sitchin's assignment of meanings to ancient words is tendentious and frequently strained."[23] Fritze also commented on Sitchin's methodology, writing that "When critics have checked Sitchin's references, they have found that he frequently quotes out of context or truncates his quotes in a way that distorts evidence in order to prove his contentions. Evidence is presented selectively and contradictory evidence is ignored."[23]

Sitchin bases his arguments on his personal interpretations of pre-Nubian and Sumerian texts, and the seal VA 243. Sitchin wrote that these ancient civilizations knew of a twelfth planet, when in fact they only knew five.[24] Hundreds of Sumerian astronomical seals and calendars have been decoded and recorded, and the total count of planets on each seal has been five. Seal VA 243 has 12 dots that Sitchin identifies as planets. When translated, seal VA 243 reads "You're his Servant" which is now thought to be a message from a nobleman to a servant. According to semitologist Michael S. Heiser, the so-called sun on Seal VA 243 is not the Sumerian symbol for the sun but is a star, and the dots are also stars.[24][25] The symbol on seal VA 243 has no resemblance to the hundreds of documented Sumerian sun symbols.

In a 1979 review of The Twelfth Planet, Roger W. Wescott,[26] Prof. of Anthropology and Linguistics at Drew University, Madison, New Jersey, noted Sitchin's amateurishness with respect to the primacy of the Sumerian language:

Sitchin's linguistics seems at least as amateurish as his anthropology, biology, and astronomy. On p. 370, for example, he maintains that "all the ancient languages . . . including early Chinese . . . stemmed from one primeval source -- Sumerian". Sumerian, of course, is the virtual archetype of what linguistic taxonomists call a language-isolate, meaning a language that does not fall into any of the well-known language-families or exhibit clear cognation with any known language. Even if Sitchin is referring to written rather than to spoken language, it is unlikely that his contention can be persuasively defended, since Sumerian ideograms were preceded by the Azilian and Tartarian signaries of Europe as well as by a variety of script-like notational systems between the Nile and Indus rivers.[27]


You should also go to the page and read the rest of the section.

en.wikipedia.org...
edit on 3-11-12 by paradox because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 11 2012 @ 08:17 AM
link   
en.wikipedia.org...
edit on 11-3-2012 by Anunaki2012 because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 11 2012 @ 08:24 AM
link   


It is indeed BS, because there is no such thing as the Anunnaki,
reply to post by paradox
 


Be careful, they are here.


Or maybe not I don't know. I just woke up.



posted on Mar, 11 2012 @ 08:39 AM
link   
He's back!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I don't know, I can't wait. I'm kinda intrigued at the thought of having an alien invasion so everyone and their brother can run around town, screaming they're here!!!!!!!!! Covering for shelter.

The the thought of them landing and opening their space ship, I'm going to be the first one running in.
edit on 11-3-2012 by Manhater because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 11 2012 @ 08:57 AM
link   
It said that aliens (Annunaki or not) will come at the end of 2012 from several years ago.

I think what Sitchin wrote is somewhat true, and I don't trust what it is written in wikipedia, but thats a personal opinion.

True or not, at least we are lucky enough as we are not going to wait a lot of time to see if it is BS or true
edit on 11-3-2012 by Bers81 because: (no reason given)
edit on 11-3-2012 by Bers81 because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 11 2012 @ 08:58 AM
link   
reply to post by paradox
 


To categorically define the knowledge and writings about the Anunnaki to just one man, Sitchin, is very disingenuous.

There are many other translations of the Sumerian texts other than Sitchin's that are completely relevant.

So to discredit the entire concept of the Anunnaki on one man's depiction, is simply ridiculous.



posted on Mar, 11 2012 @ 09:02 AM
link   
It is theoretically and hypothetically possible that if in fact we were visited in the past, that the Mayans could have left behind a "schedule" of the return of those visitors.

Why Schedule? Well, theoretically, space travel from distant locations would take a calculated amount of time to reach earth, by ways of travel that we may not understand.

It could be that the cycles shown on the Mayan calendar could in fact depict the over all round trip time for an alien race to reach earth from where ever in the universe they may be from.

Alien to Mayan: "See you when we get back" in 3600 years.



posted on Mar, 11 2012 @ 09:07 AM
link   
reply to post by phantomjack
 


that would be so cool!! I really hope they return..



posted on Mar, 11 2012 @ 09:11 AM
link   

Originally posted by phantomjack

There are many other translations of the Sumerian texts other than Sitchin's that are completely relevant.


Can you show me these?




So to discredit the entire concept of the Anunnaki on one man's depiction, is simply ridiculous.



The whole concept is simply ridiculous.



posted on Mar, 11 2012 @ 10:12 AM
link   

Originally posted by paradox

Originally posted by phantomjack

There are many other translations of the Sumerian texts other than Sitchin's that are completely relevant.


Can you show me these?




So to discredit the entire concept of the Anunnaki on one man's depiction, is simply ridiculous.



The whole concept is simply ridiculous.


Yeah. No problem. About 2000 years before Sitchin:

en.wikipedia.org...

Nephilim = Anunnaki



posted on Mar, 11 2012 @ 10:29 AM
link   

Originally posted by phantomjack

Originally posted by paradox

Originally posted by phantomjack

There are many other translations of the Sumerian texts other than Sitchin's that are completely relevant.


Can you show me these?




So to discredit the entire concept of the Anunnaki on one man's depiction, is simply ridiculous.





The whole concept is simply ridiculous.


Yeah. No problem. About 2000 years before Sitchin:

en.wikipedia.org...

Nephilim = Anunnaki




So now we are taking the bible as something literal? I do not see any translations of Sumerian texts there like I asked.

Do you believe in talking snakes as well?

Do you also think it is possible that Sitchin used this as part of his biased mistranslations?
edit on 3-11-12 by paradox because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 11 2012 @ 10:37 AM
link   

Originally posted by paradox
It is indeed BS, because there is no such thing as the Anunnaki, "Nibiru/Planet X", or alien overlords. December 21st will be a normal day like any other.

Yes, and the very first high civilization in history, the first to have writing, music, architecture design, sewers, and a written language only wrote fiction stories, and myths......I see know, they were just trying to fool us all here in the 21st century!

That was sarcasm, in case you didn't know. The truth is, the Ancient Sumerian People wrote down their HISTORY, what they saw with their eyes, heard with their ears, and felt in their bones.

And you are all knowing about the December 21st date too, I see. Hmmmm, where exactly does one obtain this knowledge of future events?
Library of Date setters for end of the world!
No body KNOWS, friend, not even you.



posted on Mar, 11 2012 @ 10:53 AM
link   

Originally posted by phantomjack
reply to post by paradox
 


To categorically define the knowledge and writings about the Anunnaki to just one man, Sitchin, is very disingenuous.

There are many other translations of the Sumerian texts other than Sitchin's that are completely relevant.

So to discredit the entire concept of the Anunnaki on one man's depiction, is simply ridiculous.

Hear hear! I too heard of the Annunaki Gods long before I heard of Stichen. He just brought it all into perspective for me, much like Erich von Daniken did. In recent years, there have been many speculative writings about Planet X, which is also known as Planet Nibiru. Most of these writings are based somewhat on Zecharia Sitchin’s book, The Twelfth Planet. Sitchin, like Velikovsky and Darwin, used his respective theories to support his claims. A question arises: Is Nibiru real? The answer to that is a resounding Yes, it does. The early people named Planet X as Nibiru in Sumerian, and Marduk in Babylonian. It has been said that the ancient Mesopotamians believed that Nibiru was the twelfth planet in our solar system and that it was "heaven" where their Gods resided and came from. The words "Annunaki," and "Nibiru" are Sumerian words, not Annunaki words. Nibiru was populated by a Reptilian super race and governed by elite aristocracy known as the "Nefilim" in Hebrew, which means "they who have come down from the Heavens to Earth". The Anunnaki were one of the many technologically advanced alien races at the time. In fact, their civilization was advanced far beyond most others of their time. The Anunnaki called their home star (Sun) "ZAOS". The Anunnaki are a belligerent and conquering race. They are fierce, evil, lustful, incestuous, bloodthirsty, deceitful, jealous and domineering. They are also carnivorous and are often cannibalistic. They also demand human sacrifices of virgins from those they conquer and from their own kind whom they enslave. If you imagine the worst characteristics you can conceive in Satan, you have well concocted an impression of the Anunnaki.

As for the Annunaki, the stone relief's pretty much speak for themselves.





Sumerian Information of the Annunaki (Sumerian equal to the Genesis Anakim) Erech was founded before 4,000 B.C.

Ancient Aliens – the Annunaki

Will they return? I think yes, they may already be close by. Will they attempt to enslave Earth? Or will this be a Rescue mission instead?
Only time will tell.





top topics
 
7
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join