Help ATS with a contribution via PayPal:
learn more

Ron paul wins virgin islands popular vote !

page: 4
56
<< 1  2  3    5  6 >>

log in

join

posted on Mar, 11 2012 @ 06:12 PM
link   
Did they use electronic voting?




posted on Mar, 11 2012 @ 06:21 PM
link   
reply to post by CALGARIAN
 


Haha WOW.
First time they declare the winner is the winner due to Delegates, and it's because Romney won the most Delegates. Ron Paul actually won the popular vote. That is so funny how they avoided saying that Ron Paul won there!

Man I think the news is trying to get RP supporters to flip and go postal
Ron Paul Wins
edit on 11-3-2012 by GogoVicMorrow because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 11 2012 @ 06:23 PM
link   
reply to post by Cassius666
 


Good question.

I doubt it though because there was only like 300 votes total or so I believe..



posted on Mar, 11 2012 @ 06:30 PM
link   
EL-OH-EL

Seriously? This is the type of news that Ron Paul supporters will rally behind?

YAY!! We won a territory.. but still managed to lose the same territory.



posted on Mar, 11 2012 @ 06:37 PM
link   
Hahaha, you just can't make this up. You claim victory yet every CREDIBLE news source says Romney won. Face it, Paul and his campaign is an embarrassing flop which never had a chance.



posted on Mar, 11 2012 @ 06:47 PM
link   
reply to post by Cynicaleye
 


I know you are a troll and all, but there is no paper disputing that Paul won Virgin Island caucus.

He beat Romney by having more votes. It is really amusing to us though that the only time the media has ever paid attention to delegates was when they needed something to take the focus away from Paul's win.



posted on Mar, 11 2012 @ 06:55 PM
link   
lol, what are they smokin down there ?



posted on Mar, 11 2012 @ 07:07 PM
link   
reply to post by mwood
 


You have hit the nail on the head....it's quite depressing when you think about it
... When will this opportunity arise again? no time soon, if Mr. Paul is out of it. Another 4 years of puppetry ahead of us, unfortunately.

Now who will save us???? Mitt? HA Rick? HA HA....NEWT????? OMFG, kill me now.



posted on Mar, 11 2012 @ 07:11 PM
link   
reply to post by Cynicaleye
 


When you say CREDIBLE, I'm wondering if, in fact, you mean "worthless drivel that Americans suck up like it was candy"....just sayin'

I take it from your Avatar, that you're not a fan?



posted on Mar, 11 2012 @ 07:42 PM
link   

Originally posted by Manhater
Is Ron Paul going to bring back internet poker? If so, I'll vote for him.
edit on 10-3-2012 by Manhater because: (no reason given)


Where did internet poker go? I play online all the time......
I guess that shows how long it's been since I played for money...
edit on 11-3-2012 by Majiq1 because: (no reason given)


Edit to add: I just checked out the site I use to play on and it is still up and running and open to U.S. players...
edit on 11-3-2012 by Majiq1 because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 11 2012 @ 07:57 PM
link   
reply to post by Majiq1
 


There was a big take down a while back. One of my friends happens to be a professional poker player, but I don't know too much about it.

I think many now won't accept US money from US banks, but I am not too sure of the details. Perhaps someone else could elaborate.

But yes, I don't see why Internet Poker in the RP Admin. wouldn't be allowed.



posted on Mar, 11 2012 @ 08:26 PM
link   
reply to post by Cynicaleye
 


No, actually, every credible news source says Ron Paul won.


Sorry but Fox News is not a credible source. Romney got trumped.

I'm sure he did in most other states as well - but he's got the money and the diebold connections to change that.

No-one likes Romney. I've only met 1 Romney supporter in my whole life who later decided to not vote at all.



posted on Mar, 11 2012 @ 08:32 PM
link   

Originally posted by Vilkata
This is how Paul may well be winning:

edit on 11-3-2012 by Vilkata because: (no reason given)
edit on 11-3-2012 by Vilkata because: (no reason given)


That is promising news but your statement that he may well be winning is off the mark. According to the numbers in the vid. that you posted, even if Paul takes all 197 of the unbound delegates that still wouldn't put him in front of Romney.

I would love to see Paul pull it off, I really would, but you have to be realistic and plan for another 4 years of Obama.



posted on Mar, 11 2012 @ 08:41 PM
link   

Originally posted by Cynicaleye
Hahaha, you just can't make this up. You claim victory yet every CREDIBLE news source says Romney won. Face it, Paul and his campaign is an embarrassing flop which never had a chance.


Despite your trollish comment - fact is Ron won the popular vote while Romney won the delegates. Interestingly enough, when Ron wins the majority of delegates - and loses the popular vote - the media says nothing.
But when Romney loses the popular vote - and wins delegates - they'll announce that.

Yeah that's fair and balanced. Please.



posted on Mar, 11 2012 @ 09:11 PM
link   
woot maby if theyd stop setting up the votes he would be in the lead by alot...

i live in Alabama maby sence the govt hates my state they wont set it up here all i see is ron paul buper stickers and supporters if he looses here ill be willing to put another of our govners in prison witch btw is like the last 10 out of 12 currupt pricks



posted on Mar, 11 2012 @ 09:22 PM
link   

Originally posted by Dance4Life
check out what ron paul did in the county conventions in Minnesota, Iowa and Nevada today.

WE ARE LITERALLY WINNING THIS THING.

Ron Paul SWEPT THE CLARK COUNTY CONVENTION TODAY. (Biggest county in Nevada!@)

link



Are you completely delusional to the way the system works? Nevada, being a caucus state delegates their delegates differently than a primary state. In Nevada, the numbers were far from favor in terms of Ron Paul. Just because he had overwhelming support in a county -- a county in which he lost because support does not equal those who actually voted -- does not mean they win.

It is the main reason that we spread the concept of Democracy to its thinnest possible levels. So that large counties and states do not dictate the outcome of such elections.

Edit to Add: Since you brought up Nevada let us analyze their numbers. Statewide, Romney received 50.0% of the delegate vote. Paul came in at a modest 19%. Just because someone wins a county, doesn't mean they are the favorite nor winner. Thank goodness for a Republican style voting system! Majority should not rule!
edit on 11-3-2012 by ownbestenemy because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 11 2012 @ 09:37 PM
link   
reply to post by mwood
 


It does matter but there is not a damn thing we can do about it.

Where do we go?

I think "some" know where this election is headed.

Not going to be someplace I want to be.



posted on Mar, 11 2012 @ 09:48 PM
link   

Originally posted by Cassius666
Did they use electronic voting?


My guess would be NO.

In a few days the #'s will change



posted on Mar, 11 2012 @ 10:21 PM
link   
reply to post by ownbestenemy
 


We won the top two counties I believe. Also, there are undercover delegates that will ABSTAIN from voting in the first round for their bound candidate. As long as RP keeps getting delegates through this grassroots approach he is going to be hard to stop.



posted on Mar, 11 2012 @ 10:21 PM
link   
reply to post by Dance4Life
 


The software is rigged in most states so the Virgins never got that software in it's systems apparently? He will never win until we remove the software from the computers. It is painfully obvious that all of these fringe Romney and Santorum supporters we are told by the MSM don't exist ! This election is artificial.

It does not stop with this guy

edit on 11-3-2012 by Unknown Soldier because: (no reason given)





new topics

top topics



 
56
<< 1  2  3    5  6 >>

log in

join