It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ProudBird
reply to post by 1AnunnakiBastard
You see.....here is the problem with just blindly believing every crap "documentary" out there without checking their facts:
The Apollo 11 mission meticulously landed at 33° on the Moon...
Ahem.....this is wrong. (So, what does that tell you about the rest of their claims??):
Apollo Landing Sites
Apollo 11 - Mare Tranquillitatis
Lunar Landing Time 4:17:40 p.m. EDT, July 20, 1969
Landing Site Coordinates 0.67408° N latitude, 23.47297° E longitude
Ooops.....so, no. Apollo 11 did not land at 33 degrees of anything!
Care to check the other "facts"? Buzz is Catholic.....he took communion (or whatever it's called). NOt a "masonic ritual".
Check and re-check facts, instead of just swallowing whatever is presented to you!edit on Sat 10 March 2012 by ProudBird because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by miniatus
Originally posted by Swills
reply to post by miniatus
Don't jump to assumptions.. yes I've read some of his books, seen countless interviews.. I respect him as an intellectual, however .. he has absolutely no basis for his reptilian fantasy .. the phase where that was dreamed up sounds more like a bad acid trip.. sorry.. but that's just what it seems like.. not saying he's wrong, there could be reptile people lurking among us.. but he's given a bad foundation for believing an ounce of it..
I am over it .. I'm just saying throwing him into the mix really didn't help the credibility in MY personal opinion.. you don't have to share my opinion..
beliefs way back when.
edit on 3/10/2012 by miniatus because: (no reason given)
One man’s reptilians is another man’s aliens is another man’s interdimensional entites is another man’s demons.
Reptilians have been written and talked about for thousands of years before Icke got on the scene.
Why should we believe you? Why are you correct and others not?
Originally posted by game over man
Can you imagine a mission to the moon where only a handful of people shared the knowledge of ancient alien structures on the moon, and they were able to retrieve samples and return to Earth with no one knowing?!
Of course there's no PROOF. There's no PROOF that it wasn't aliens.
Argument from ignorance, also known as argumentum ad ignorantiam or "appeal to ignorance" (where "ignorance" stands for: "lack of evidence to the contrary"), is a fallacy in informal logic. It asserts that a proposition is true because it has not yet been proven false, it is "generally accepted" (or vice versa). This represents a type of false dichotomy in that it excludes a third option, which is that there is insufficient investigation and therefore insufficient information to prove the proposition satisfactorily to be either true or false. Nor does it allow the admission that the choices may in fact not be two (true or false), but may be as many as four, (1) true, (2) false, (3) unknown between true or false, and (4) being unknowable (among the first three). In debates, appeals to ignorance are sometimes used to shift the burden of proof.
Originally posted by doug r
Just what is it that drives a debunker on a woo-woo internet forum to devote so many hours trying to deny totally anonymous strangers' musings, thoughts and beliefs? Do they get some kind of gold star from their daddy at the end of the day for saving civilization from ideas? Are the ideas that dangerous?
If they're that dangerous, there must be a lot more to them than meets the eye. If they're really nothing, as debunkers claim, they can't be worth all that effort.edit on 11-3-2012 by doug r because: (no reason given)