reply to post by petrus4
You start right off by saying being a racist is bad but offer no objective argument to back that statement up. It appears that this is merely your
opinion but being your opinion it therefore requires no justification, yes?
You then go into a rant explaining how there are only two possible reasons for considering the possibility that all races are not equal in all
respects, neither of which is a simple desire to know the objective truth. Again, you offer no proof or argument other than that this is your opinion
but again it appears it therefore needs no justification, yes?
You then finish up with a paragraph of insults. Do you believe this qualifies as intelligent debate?
So once again you have demonstrated the tendency of the politically correct to adhere to their assumptions even in the face of directly contradictory
I believe I did point out that while I acknowledge the races to be different I at no point acknowledged any race's claim to superiority. It therefore
follows that there is no justification for any race to claim the right to eliminate any other race based on a perception of
I had also asked if it was revealed that one portion of humanity was descended from a different prehistoric hominid than another then the possibility
exists that they might not be equal in all regards. One might be faster or stronger or more intelligent.
I did not ask if this was the case. I ask if it were unreasonable for a person to ask? Should any area of scientific inquiry be forbidden because it
might emotionally upset people? Forgive me but I don't believe I caught your answer to that question.
In fact I don't believe you really stated anything except your personal opinion in rant form.
I could be wrong but I believe you are proving the very point I was trying to make.
Your system of belief, of total racial equality as preached by the politically correct has been challenged and rather than try to deal with any facts
or even with what has been said you go into an emotional tirade.
"NO" you declare. No one could possibly investigate the subject out of scientific curiosity. They must be subhumans motivated by 'hate' and
Subhumans motivated by 'hate' and 'fear'? What would make you say that?
They do not believe as you do!!!!
My my. Aren't you the epitome of tolerance?
So I have read that I share 96-98.8 % of my DNA with chimpanzees.
I share only 96% with the sub-Saharan African.
Is it therefore wrong of me to wonder what those genes are responsible for? A 4% difference seems to have produced some major differences between
humans and chimpanzees but I should 'assume' it produced no difference between the two groups of humans?
And even to ask the question establishes me as a hate and fear-filled sub-human?
How about the geneticist currently working on exploring the function of those different genes? Are they all hate and fear-filled bigots?
Intellectual honesty? You will not even acknowledge the existence of scientific curiosity!
You need to get over yourself and I suggest you begin by learning the difference between scientific facts and your personal opinions.