It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
But, if he's all those things, I'd wager his interpretation of "Lucifer" is a far cry from Christians who think they know who Lucifer was. (Hint: they don't... Lucifer was the planet Venus—not a person, not an angel, not a demon... a planet. Period.)
Originally posted by LeonoraTenen
It makes perfect sense. I have come to this conclusion in the past, but how a person who is a young member of Golden Dawn, BOTA, EGC and OTO can become the WM of a major lodge in Los Angeles, is crazy to me. So you have a WM who is an esoteric occultist, who believes Lucifer is as much God as YHVH.
There's nothing in occult wisdom that isn't available to everyone who bothers to look for it. I don't buy the argument that anyone has an edge, nor that it can be used as a weapon.
I was told by this friend [and an older man (past WM at same lodge - who is also a deep high-level occult practitioner) that there is a split happening in their lodge and in many lodges.. between the members who want it to remain a mundane, mostly-secular organization.. and the members who want to see FM return to its mystical roots in magick and have more teachings regarding the higher "pathworkings" (for lack of a better word).
So there is this split occurring within the organization and they acknowledge the mystical roots are akin to other forms of magick, outside of the Lodge.
It's really difficult to separate FM from the occult. When so many world rulers have been masons and have also many times resorted to using "occult" wisdom as an edge (another tool or weapon) over their opponents.
Indeed. A tool. Not a weapon.
The CIA teaches esoteric magick as a means for remote viewing. Another friend of mine studied Kabbalah with an elderly gent who was ex-CIA. He learned about it in the CIA and told of many types of divination techniques they use to gather information. It's just a tool.
Originally posted by Masonic Light
"Lucifer" is not a part of Freemasonry, nor the GD, BOTA, EGC, or the OTO anyway.
The day has come when Fellow Craftsmen must know and apply their knowledge. The lost key to their grade is the mastery of emotion, which places the energy of the universe at their disposal. Man can only expect to be entrusted with great power by proving his ability to use it constructively and selflessly. When the Mason learns that the key to the warrior on the block is the proper application of the dynamo of living power, he has learned the mystery of his Craft. The seething energies of Lucifer are in his hands and before he may step onward and upward, he must prove his ability to properly apply energy. He must follow in the footsteps of his forefather, Tubal-Cain, who with the mighty strength of the war god hammered his sword into a plowshare. Incessant vigilance over thought, action, and desire is indispensable to those who wish to make progress in the unfolding of their own being, and the Fellow Craft’s degree is the degree of transmutation. The hand that slays must lift the fallen, while the lips given to cursing must be taught to pray. The heart that hates must learn the mystery of compassion, as the result of a deeper and more perfect understanding of man’s relation to his brother. The firm, kind hand of spirit must curb the flaming powers of emotion with an iron grip. In the realization and application of these principles lies the key of the Fellow Craft.
Originally posted by LeonoraTenen
Originally posted by JoshNorton
I think he was screwing with some young punk who shoved a camera in his face.
No different than Buzz Aldrin punching the jerk who insisted that there was no moon landing.
People get tired of the badgering, and sometimes they snap.
Originally posted by HardToStarboard
(And by the way, I tend to think he was just having some fun at the expense of the character with the camera.)
I'm not buying that... he was so ready with the whole spiel of ..."virtuous and pure, wholesome and innocent, how can you judge me?"
C'mon guys. He wasn't joking.. it just seems disingenuous and reachy to say that.
I'm not saying I can prove he was being serious, but sometimes in conversations you have to trust that your fellow conversationalist is being honest with you and themselves and really taking a look at what is happening, instead of bending their discernment (and interpretations) to fit what they want to believe.
I think anybody watching this, as an un-biased entity, taking it at face value... would conclude that he was NOT joking, but was taken off guard, by a rude Christian ambush journalist.
I agree it was rude and audacious. But I don't think it is entirely honest to jump to the conclusion he was joking.
That is like saying "Richard Ramirez" (the night stalker) was joking when he said he killed all those people.
The only person who would say such a thing would be either him, or his defense attorney.
But thank you for at least responding on that instead of ignoring it like last time I posted it here in this thread.edit on 12-4-2012 by LeonoraTenen because: (no reason given)
On February 11, 1988, several Masonic officials visited President Ronald W. Reagan in the Oval Office of the White House. Among the Masons present were:
Most Wor. Raymond F. McMullen Grand Master of Masons of the District of Columbia
Most Wor. Stewart W. Miner, PGM Grand Secretary of the Grand Lodge of the District of Columbia
Wor. William E. Chaney, Jr. Grand Marshal of the Grand Lodge of the District of Columbia
Ill. Francis S. Paul Sovereign Grand Commander of the Scottish Rite, Northern Masonic Jurisdiction Sidney R. Baxter Assistant to the Sovereign Grand Commander, Northern Masonic Jurisdiction, A.A.S.R.
Ill. C. Fred Kleinknecht Sovereign Grand Commander of the Scottish Rite, Southern Jurisdiction
Carroll M. Bowman Assistant Grand Secretary General, Southern Jurisdiction, A.A.S.R.
Ill. Voris King Imperial Potentate of the A.A.O.N.M.S. (Shrine) of North America
Jack H. Jones Imperial Recorder, A.A.O.N.M.S. (Shrine) of North America
The Grand Master of D.C. presented President Reagan with a "Certificate of Honor," which said that President Reagan's life was a testament to his firm belief in brotherly love, relief, and truth, and his service to the public has broadened the applications of temperance, fortitude, prudence, and justice to the benefit of all mankind. This Certificate further said that in recognition of President Reagan's efforts to promote good will and understanding throughout the world, this certificate was issued to him by the Grand Master of D.C. on February 11, 1988. A complete copy of the Certificate is printed at page 67 of the 1988 D.C. Proceedings.
SOURCE
Originally posted by LeonoraTenen
You are right with the exception of the OTO.
And with the others, I would say "not officially"... but in the writings of Blavatsky, Hall, Pike and numerous other occultist teachers who have un-doubtedly shaped the theological and theosophical beliefs of all 4 of those organizations, Lucifer is aligned with God.
Crowley's Thelema is OTO. And I need not go into Crowley's obsession with "the Beast 666" and "Baphomet".
The OTO and Baphomet go hand in hand, period. And Baphomet is an analogue for Lucifer in Crowley and many other authors' writings.
All I need to do is bring this back to Manly P. Hall's (33º) statements in Chapter IV (page 48) of his book "The Lost Keys of Freemasonry", which I own by the way.
I am fully aware that Freemasons at large have done everything possible to distance themselves from Manly P. Hall... saying his 33º held no authority and that he wrote this before he was a Freemason.
My freemason friends are the ones who told me about him back in the day and the WM guy had all his books and really loved the guy. He didn't feel it misrepresented Freemasonry at all.
So this just shows me that Freemasonry is whatever to whoever... it's as slippery as a banana slug and it can slither its way out of any sticky situation, simply by claiming so & so wasn't REALLY a mason.
It happened with Thomas Payne after he wrote "The Age of Reason".
As soon as one of them spills the beans, (but not before it gets public attention) they cut ties and make the person resign of their official connections.
Originally posted by JoshNorton
But, if he's all those things, I'd wager his interpretation of "Lucifer" is a far cry from Christians who think they know who Lucifer was. (Hint: they don't... Lucifer was the planet Venus—not a person, not an angel, not a demon... a planet. Period.)
Originally posted by JoshNorton
There's nothing in occult wisdom that isn't available to everyone who bothers to look for it. I don't buy the argument that anyone has an edge, nor that it can be used as a weapon.
Originally posted by JoshNorton
Indeed. A tool. Not a weapon.
The CIA teaches esoteric magick as a means for remote viewing. Another friend of mine studied Kabbalah with an elderly gent who was ex-CIA. He learned about it in the CIA and told of many types of divination techniques they use to gather information. It's just a tool.
Originally posted by LeonoraTenen
I know Lucifer is not a demon. But I would argue that it is much more than JUST a planet.
It is the bringer of knowledge. The agent of free-will..
Originally posted by KSigMason
reply to post by LeonoraTenen
It's not semantics, it is fact that Reagan was never a member least of all a 33º. There is documentation that proves our points on Reagan's connection to Masonry. You don't like getting into debates because we don't just blindly accept your lies and we can counter with facts.
Originally posted by KSigMason
You try to label everyone who disagrees with you as "low level" outside the need-to-know without actually having any fact of who you are talking to. That seems kind of reckless to make such assumptions.
Originally posted by KSigMason
If Masonry is truly as compartmentalized as you think it is, doesn't reason/logic lead us to see that you would fall even lower than us? How can you justify making blind stabs in the dark?
Originally posted by KSigMason
Coming here with such a misguided, pessimistic, and aggressive manner shows you never wanted an honest conversation, but rather came to through your words around and be done with it.
Originally posted by MattNC
And please don't come back and play the "you hurt my feelings" card now that your anti-Mason arguments have been shot full of holes.
You're trying to cloak your desire to pick a fight in a veil of "just wondering".
Originally posted by LeonoraTenen
Yes, I admit, I have problems with freemasonry and I am aggressive about my stance.
Same goes with FM.. it descends straight from the Templars and they are the guardians of the grail.. the Cherubim, guarding the secret of Christ (as said in the above post by "All Seeing Eye").
Originally posted by Masonic Light
Originally posted by LeonoraTenen
I know Lucifer is not a demon. But I would argue that it is much more than JUST a planet.
It is the bringer of knowledge. The agent of free-will..
The true name of Satan, the Kabalists say, is that of Yahveh reversed; for Satan is not a black god, but the negation of God. The Devil is the personification of Atheism or Idolatry.
For the Initiates, this is not a Person, but a Force, created for good, but which may serve for evil. It is the instrument of Liberty or Free Will. They represent this Force, which presides over the physical generation, under the mythologic and horned form of the God PAN; thence came the he-goat of the Sabbat, brother of the Ancient Serpent, and the Light-bearer or Phosphor, of which the poets have made the false Lucifer of the legend.
- Albert Pike (Morals and Dogma of the Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite of Freemasonry, p. 102)
Originally posted by KSigMason
reply to post by LeonoraTenen
Which Masonic Temple has the picture? I'd like to see that.
Originally posted by KSigMason
Golden Dawn and OTO are not under the umbrella of the Masonic fraternity, but I'm sure you see some bleed over in membership.
Originally posted by KSigMason
I've been all over the world in various Masonic Lodges and buildings, and I've never seen a Baphomet on a Masonic wall.
Originally posted by KSigMason
Many scholars, particularly those who are Masons, debate about the origins of our rites
Originally posted by Masonic Light
Originally posted by LeonoraTenen
Yes, I admit, I have problems with freemasonry and I am aggressive about my stance.
I'm curious as to why you, a self-proclaimed Kabalist, would have problems with Freemasonry, which, in Levi's words, is "The Grand Kabalistic Association"?
Originally posted by HardToStarboard
Speaking of ignoring, are you going to contact him? Who better to speak to his meaning in the video than himself?
Originally posted by LeonoraTenen
Originally posted by HardToStarboard
Speaking of ignoring, are you going to contact him? Who better to speak to his meaning in the video than himself?
Gimme a break. It's not on my list of "To Do's" for today... thank you very much.
Why don't you give the poor ol' guy a call. I'm sure he's really nice and isn't totally sick and tired of hearing about this every day.
Originally posted by LeonoraTenen
Besides, "picking a fight" you say?? What are you and your buddy doing RIGHT NOW?
You are ganging up on me, talking in posturing, mock-intimidating ways. All fighting traits. You hypocrite!
Originally posted by LeonoraTenen
As a free human, I have a problem with [[what I have come to view as]] their infiltration and domination of society through the rule of government and staging covert revolutions to shake things up and playing both sides of the race. While painting themselves as rogue outsiders of British rule.
I believe there is an Aeon, An Epoch... a global age happening that is culminating from an ancient plan.
It is all perfect and I wouldn't change a thing.
I have problems with Kabbalah and Judaism now because of what I've learned about the Rothschilds and Zionism. And after coming across certain historical documents that list (by year) masses of Jewish ritual sacrifices and hearing stories of people raised in evil Kabbalist sects who practiced crazy horrible rituals I won't go into, I have my concerns with that whole current too.
I am a human with a heart and I see some things that nobody who can explain, will explain and there is a Conspiracy of Greed happening in the world.. but I see it having Occult origins and I see the plan of the Bavarian Illuminati still unfolding as the new Aeon is slowly but surely ushered in.
Originally posted by Masonic Light
I doubt either of us is interested in a long, drawn-out debate about that. Suffice it to say that I disagree with your idea on this, and do not believe that the Masonic institution has infiltrated anything. I think the conspiracy theorists who pursue these lines give the fraternity far too much credit.
Originally posted by Masonic Light
The problem here is that none of that stuff actually seems to be real. The Rothschilds are just people, and are slandered a lot because they're rich.
Originally posted by Masonic Light
Zionism is the belief that the Jews should have a homeland, which they probably should.
Originally posted by Masonic Light
And how could a Kabalist, if he's really a Kabalist, be evil? Why would as Kabalist want to engage in crazy, horrible rituals? The answer, of course, is that he probably wouldn't.
Originally posted by Masonic Light
Are you in favor, or opposed, to the plan of the Bavarian Illuminati? And how is it that their plan (the democratizaion of monarchical and Church-ruled Europe) is still relevant today, when all that has already been accomplished?