It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The 5th Amendment says, in part, that no person “. . . shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself. . . .” Thanks to this decision our computers are not necessarily witnesses against us as well.
The story
The defendant, a John Doe, was accused of possessing child pornography. He was ordered to produce the unencrypted contents of his notebook hard drive and an additional 5 external drives. Mr. Doe, representing himself, refused, citing the 5th.
The U.S. Attorney then requested limited immunity from the district court for Mr. Doe, which did NOT include using the drive’s contents against him in a criminal prosecution. Mr. Doe again refused to decrypt the drives he was found in contempt of court and jailed. He appealed.
Mr. Doe spent almost 8 months in jail before his appeal succeeded.
In Mr. Doe’s case, the court held that the decryption would require the use of the contents of his mind and is not simply a physical act, like handing over a key to a safe. Furthermore, the fact that the government did not know - could not know - whether any files were on the hard drives, meant that they failed the “reasonable particularity” test too.
The court then noted that if Mr. Doe had been given full immunity they could have compelled him to produce all the contents of the drives. But since they didn’t, the 5th Amendment offered him more protection and thus his use of it was justified.
Note also that Mr. Doe - a lawyer I’m guessing - won, but only after 8 months in jail and the related loss of income. Defending our rights is rarely easy, which is why they erode.
Mr. Doe spent almost 8 months in jail before his appeal succeeded.
Originally posted by Jason88
So setting the log-in password is not good enough because if law enforcement seize your machines they can pretty much crack it, right? It's easy(ish) to do. But, if you take the time to encrypt your files then the law cannot ask you to reveal it, but they can attempt to crack the information on their own.
Interesting from a privacy standpoint. But as others have mentioned it depends on the echelon of the crime, but while child porn is not a terror threat, it still ranks up there as dangerous and despicable.
Originally posted by Jason88
reply to post by AzureSky
I learn something on ATS everyday. Thanks for clarifying that.
I don't have anything to hide, but areas of the 5th Amendment fascinate me. So now that because "your mind" holds the password that would lead to incrimination, it can be construed as testimony against yourself so therefor the 5th Amendment applies.
You mention other types of encryption - thumb scan, iris scans, face scans (I have that one on an old machine); since those are not in "the mind", I wonder if the court can compel a defendant to unlock that material?
Originally posted by Jason88
So setting the log-in password is not good enough because if law enforcement seize your machines they can pretty much crack it, right? It's easy(ish) to do. But, if you take the time to encrypt your files then the law cannot ask you to reveal it, but they can attempt to crack the information on their own.
Originally posted by spirit_horse
reply to post by VoidHawk
I have a cd that will wipe your password and replace it with the one I tell it to. For windows anyway. I don't mess with linux or unix much. No need to use brute force or dictionary attacks.
ETA: Your password is not required to replace it.
edit on 8/3/12 by spirit_horse because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by spirit_horse
reply to post by VoidHawk
I have a cd that will wipe your password and replace it with the one I tell it to.