It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Who Knew? Contraceptives Will Aid Bogus ‘Global Warming Crisis’

page: 1
4
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 8 2012 @ 03:18 AM
link   
Who Knew? Contraceptives Will Aid Bogus ‘Global Warming Crisis’

Well I never would have thought !!

But I guess a big-shot from Stanford University speaking at the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars in Washington, D.C. must certainly beyond any shadow of a doubt be convincing enough.

Kavita Ramdas has exposed the Secret of Schweppes on how to lessen the carbon emissions caused by "Human Beings" of all things !!


This is the answer !

It’s amazing how liberals can, with a straight face, rationalize condom distribution with the alleged global warming crisis facing the world. The “climate change” or “global warming” threat isn’t real, but that doesn’t stop radical abortion and population control zealots from pursuing their goals in tandem.

One of those zealots is Kavita Ramdas, who recently gave a speech at the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars in Washington, D.C. Ramdas is a bigwig at Stanford University.

According to Ramdas, “empowering women to time their pregnancies” and to abort unwanted babies would reduce carbon emissions between 8-15% globally.

Ramdas claims: “It is common sense that when women are able to plan their pregnancies, populations grow more slowly and as a result so do greenhouse gas emissions. Providing access to contraception and preventative health should be one of the many effective strategies used to fight climate change.”

The Answer to Carbon Emissions Revealed !


More "fuel" for thought:

Ramdas thinks that preventing births and aborting unwanted children is especially important in the U.S. because Americans, on average, use 40% more of the earth’s resources than children in other countries.




I never knew this !

Who wants to go first ? !




posted on Mar, 8 2012 @ 04:10 AM
link   
I want a first taste test..just to make sure there is no out of bound dried ergot.



posted on Mar, 8 2012 @ 04:17 AM
link   
..."Bogus global warming"...

..."Bogus global warming"...

..."Bogus global warming"...

Because catapulting the oil industry's propaganda is a full time job for certain ats member(s).








posted on Mar, 8 2012 @ 04:31 AM
link   
You're blatantly ignoring FACTS:

1) Global warming isn't a hoax, 9 of the 10 hottest years happened since 2000. If you disagree, talk to the inhabitants of Kiribati (there's a thread on here about it) who have to relocate because of rising sea levels.

2) Contraception > less births > slower population growth > less pollution > less global warming.

You're so uninformed when it comes to contraception, it's almost comical



posted on Mar, 8 2012 @ 04:33 AM
link   
Whether you believe in GLOBAL WARMING OR NOT....guess who does? The U.S. Military! Current Arctic Sea Ice melt will mean that the Arctic ocean will be no longer covered with Sea Ice. The Russians...eager to drill for oil in this area...have even gone to the effort of taking a deep diving mini-sub and planting a small Russian Flag at the botton sea floor of a particular part of the Arctic Ocean where they believe they have rights to drill.

The U.S. Military is considering holding off on the U.S. Nimitz Aircraft Carriers retirement so as to use this as another carrier group to patrol and police new shipping lanes that will be soon in use...some as soon as this summer....but when all Arctic Sea Ice has melted...and this is not disputed in any way by the U.S. Military and it is a statement of fact as far as the USN is concerned...the Navy wants a large Americn Presence in the Arctic Region to police the inevitable squabbling over Oil Drilling Rights and passage of Containr Shipping which will cut thousands of miles off normal Ocean Travel.

When the U.S. Navy starts spending a Billion or so Dollars just to renovate an Aircraft Carrier to be Arctic Patrol Carrier Group....there is PROOF IN THE PUDDING. All the non-believers can eat CROW because when our own Joint Chiefs start having special meetings about developing Nuclear Powered Ice Cutters for the interm plan untill the Ice is completely gone....only an IDIOT whould still cling to Global Warming being BOGUS! Split Infinity



posted on Mar, 8 2012 @ 04:41 AM
link   

Originally posted by MrXYZ
You're blatantly ignoring FACTS:

1) Global warming isn't a hoax, 9 of the 10 hottest years happened since 2000. If you disagree, talk to the inhabitants of Kiribati (there's a thread on here about it) who have to relocate because of rising sea levels.

2) Contraception > less births > slower population growth > less pollution > less global warming.

You're so uninformed when it comes to contraception, it's almost comical


How did they measure the temperature in the North Pole in the year 1492 ?

You should read this article:


The cat is out of the bag. I could not figure out why the media, including this paper, has suddenly hit us from all sides with global warming.

It climaxed with the report from the Intergovernment Panel on Climate Change, a UN panel established under the United Nations Environment Programme. This panel is not made up “of hundreds of scientists,” as the AP articles state. The IPCC does not carry out research, nor does it monitor climate-related data or other relevant parameters. It selects scientific literature to be peer-reviewed and overseen by its parent UN organizations. It concluded that global warming is real and that human activity is the cause.

Here are a few basics facts on global warming. The greenhouse effect related to global warming is not the same as the backyard greenhouse, but both trap heat. The major atmospheric constituents (nitrogen, N2 and oxygen, O2) are not greenhouse gases. Water vapor accounts for about 90 percent of the Earth’s greenhouse effect. Carbon dioxide (CO2), nitrous oxide, methane, ozone contributes the rest. It should be noted that changes in the relative humidity on the order of 1.3 to 4 percent are equivalent to the effect of doubling the CO2. An IPCC report admitted that “the role of water vapor as a greenhouse gas” is “extremely misleading,” as water vapor cannot be controlled by humans.

Increased levels of carbon dioxide can cause an initial rise in temperatures. This rise evaporates tropical oceans, which leads to increased cloud condensation at high elevations. This cloud cover then blocks sunlight from heating the earth, resulting in cooler global temperatures. Haven’t you ever wondered why it’s cooler when it’s cloudy? If human activity increased carbon dioxide levels, it would not raise the temperature. In fact, the global temperatures have been stable. Satellites measure temperatures to .01 degrees Celsius, find a statistically significant cooling trend in the lower atmosphere since they started taking measurements in 1979. Warming simply isn’t happening, according to the satellite data. The satellite data also matches up perfectly, on a year-to-year basis, with temperatures measured in the lower atmosphere by weather balloons. This is a completely independent corroboration of the lack of predicted warming.

Then where does this warming trend come from? Big warming numbers come not from measurements but from computer models. You know the saying about computers, “garbage in — garbage out.”


Global warming is a hoax



posted on Mar, 8 2012 @ 04:44 AM
link   
omg what's next?

condoms are bad for landfill? = thus bad for the environment?

sex = breathing heavy warms the planet and makes too much co2?

farout...




posted on Mar, 8 2012 @ 04:55 AM
link   

Originally posted by MrXYZ
You're blatantly ignoring FACTS:

Um .... Kinda looks like YOU are ...


Global warming isn't a hoax,

The issue with 'global warming' isn't if the earth is getting warmer. The issue is that the left is screaming that it's all due to people doing it when in fact there is no evidence to support that. From the 'hide the decline' memogate of 'global warming' to the inconvenient truth that Al Gore's 'Inconvenient Truth' was easily debunked, to the fact that the entire solar system is heating up and that the earth naturally goes through warming cycles ...


You're so uninformed when it comes to contraception, it's almost comical

You're so uninformed when it comes to both 'global warming' and contraception,
it's almost comical
backatchya.


Since we are on contraceptives .... the one 'environmental' thing that oral contraceptives will do that is environmentally unfriendly is that when people take them, they pee out the drugs and hormones used in them. This goes into the waters and doesn't get filtered out like it should. It has upset the eco-balance of the waters.




edit on 3/8/2012 by FlyersFan because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 8 2012 @ 04:59 AM
link   

Originally posted by Snoopy1978
..."Bogus global warming"...

..."Bogus global warming"...

..."Bogus global warming"...

Because catapulting the oil industry's propaganda is a full time job for certain ats member(s).



I'm confused ...

What does the oil industry have to do with birth control ?



posted on Mar, 8 2012 @ 05:01 AM
link   
ah well that is funny cos I looked after a friend of mines plants once and I put in a contraceptive into the soil to help it grow better and bloody heck.. It did.

it was a plant that was being grown in an artificial environment. It wouldn't have grown at all without help of the hormones... lighting etc.

maybe the water run off into the drains would have made the fish get bigger too?

farout... if contraceptives are a problem.. what the hell are we gona do about al the pee from those cows being fed hormones?



posted on Mar, 8 2012 @ 05:14 AM
link   
reply to post by xuenchen
 


You're falling for disinformation paid for by the oil industry


Global warming is a FACT!!



posted on Mar, 8 2012 @ 05:15 AM
link   
reply to post by FlyersFan
 


Plenty of evidence...you're simply ignoring it



posted on Mar, 8 2012 @ 05:34 AM
link   

Originally posted by MrXYZ
reply to post by xuenchen
 


You're falling for disinformation paid for by the oil industry


Global warming is a FACT!!


I think you have fallen for the disinfo from the global warming graduates.

They have all gotten rich from the agenda they preach.

You need to come down to reality.

How much carbon emissions do humans produce anyway ?

Scientifically speaking of course.



posted on Mar, 8 2012 @ 06:05 AM
link   

Originally posted by xuenchen

Originally posted by MrXYZ
reply to post by xuenchen
 


You're falling for disinformation paid for by the oil industry


Global warming is a FACT!!


I think you have fallen for the disinfo from the global warming graduates.

They have all gotten rich from the agenda they preach.

You need to come down to reality.

How much carbon emissions do humans produce anyway ?

Scientifically speaking of course.



Clearly you haven't read the info in that link...it clearly disproves those oil industry disinfo agents. Have you even bothered to read up on the Heartland Institute and how they manipulate data to pretend global warming isn't real? Read their latest internal report and be AMAZED



posted on Mar, 8 2012 @ 06:26 AM
link   
For those who are still fooled by the climate change disinformation campaign by the oil industry, here's a brilliant FACTUAL analysis of their PR machine, and how they falsify results: LINK

One of their employees posted internal documents of the Heartland Institute, one of the main drivers behind climate change denialism. Of course they tried hard to have those emails taken down, but as we all know once something is posted online, it's stays there




The Heartland Institute — a self-described “think tank” that actually serves in part as a way for climate change denialism to get funded — has a potentially embarrassing situation on their hands. Someone going by the handle “Heartland Insider” has anonymously released quite a few of what are claimed to be internal documents from Heartland, revealing the Institute’s strategies, funds, and much more.





[Dr. Wojick's] effort will focus on providing curriculum that shows that the topic of climate change is controversial and uncertain – two key points that are effective at dissuading teachers from teaching science.


So they are openly admitting to trying to suppress science.

PS: Heartland Institute has CONFIRMED those emails!! So this isn't "guessing", the FACTS presented are real, and clearly show how they dupe people into believing their nonsense (hell, in those emails they even admit their drivel is nonsense and not based on facts).
edit on 8-3-2012 by MrXYZ because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 8 2012 @ 07:53 AM
link   
reply to post by MrXYZ
 


You're confusing the act of advocating skepticism with the act of not allowing any degree of certainty whatsoever. The Heartland Institute can say whatever they want, it's not upto them to convince or unconvince anyone, it's upto the individual, and this individual has rejected anthropic global warming/climate change.

That decision was not based on their documents nor their advocations, it was based on my personal examination as a physicist. I frankly do not trust climate scientists-- they are far too localized, and ignorant of space weather. All the more to be skeptical when that research is used to economically oppress people.

Mars Melt Hints at Solar, Not Human, Cause for Warming

Sun Causes Climate Change Shock

New, convincing evidence indicates global warming is caused by cosmic rays and the sun — not humans

Probing the cosmic-ray–climate link

"our sun is passing through an interstellar energy cloud which excites/energizes the sun"

"The Berkeley Earth study did not assess temperature changes in the oceans, which according to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change have not warmed as much as land. When averaged in, they reduce the global surface temperature rise over the past 50 years"

the Sun's atmosphere and magnetic field are constantly expanding outwards into the solar system.


edit on 8-3-2012 by imherejusttoread because: fixed an url.



posted on Mar, 8 2012 @ 08:19 AM
link   
reply to post by MrXYZ
 


^
||


You really should read the above info.



posted on Mar, 8 2012 @ 08:42 AM
link   

Originally posted by xuenchen
Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars in Washington, D.C.


Are you sure it wasn't at the Derek Zoolander Center For Children Who Can't Read Good And Wanna Learn To Do Other Stuff Good Too? It so ludicrous I guess it could've been either.

/TOA



posted on Mar, 8 2012 @ 09:00 AM
link   
this whole thing has really gotten out of control but it doesn't surprise me. Just like how Christians use Christianity as a last resort the left has used their Global Warming religion as a last resort to fight their battles.

Another example of gov't getting in the WAY!!!!!



posted on Mar, 8 2012 @ 09:32 AM
link   

Originally posted by xuenchen
reply to post by MrXYZ
 


^
||


You really should read the above info.




I have...even before he posted those links. The problem is, science doesn't support his conclusions at all. The whole "Mars is warming too" and "it's the sun's fault" arguments have been debunked over and over and over again. It's another LIE put into circulation by those industries that would suffer the most if they would be forced to act responsibly.

LINK

In short, those links he posted aren't stating facts at all, they're blatantly misinterpreting data


The problem is that a lot of "news sources" like the Telegraph and NYT are featuring those stupid non-factual opinion pieces where they present some facts, but then totally misinterpret the data to come up with the wrong conclusions...conclusion their corporate owners obviously prefer. A good example of this is the following article: LINK

In addition, the "famous" climate gate emails were a bunch of hot air...none of the accusations actually turned out to be true. Don't believe me?

Here's the proof:

LINK
LINK

Keep in mind all the information in those articles is sourced and linked correctly. You can check out the original sources. Those are FACTS, and not some random disinfo misinterpretations the climate change denial crowd loves to use so much

edit on 8-3-2012 by MrXYZ because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics



 
4
<<   2 >>

log in

join