Young Obama supporting Radical preoff. The Brietbart tape..

Since proven to be played in full on PBS a long time ago.

Even in death, same 'ol Breitbart.

All I see is an activist.

Then this morning I come into ATS and see another thread a supposed hot Mic of "Obama" talking about TPTB.

Soo fake and obviously so. It sounds like an act. Hell even GLP doesn't believe it.

I know people hate Obama sooo much, but there is not a lot of weight to it. Did you know my two younger brothers are on "Obamacare" because they are 23 and 24 respectively and my father was able to keep them on his health insurance cause they are in school.

One of my brothers was thought to have a neurological disease a few months because his leg was tightening and his foot was arching. He needed MRIs and specialists and it would have costed him an upwards of 30,000 dollars all to find out he needed to support his left foot better. His bills are almost non existent now.

Needless to say, it worked for our family.

Originally posted by Rren

Originally posted by mastahunta
It's clear how much he hates America, he doesn't even wear his flag pin... He pisses on
dead troops and they sweared him on using the Coran.

Wow. Not one of those claims is even close to being true. It is really sad how pathetic the Obama opposition is getting. Do you really believe this stuff?

Scary.

Pretty sure he's just pullin' your leg...

Originally posted by abe froman
Its really no secret that Obama hates America, he won't even say the pledge of alleigence. His life's work is to be the man that takes America down from the inside. And if he can't do it mitt Romney will.

Then your very next post.

Let's not get silly.

I think you crossed that "silly" line long long ago.

Originally posted by OutKast Searcher

Originally posted by abe froman
Its really no secret that Obama hates America, he won't even say the pledge of alleigence. His life's work is to be the man that takes America down from the inside. And if he can't do it mitt Romney will.

Then your very next post.

Let's not get silly.

I think you crossed that "silly" line long long ago.

Very silly. I pay close attention to a lot of our elected officials and I just don't see it happening.

Looks like Bell was one of the forerunners in trying to FORCE affirmative action, regardless of a person's qualifications. from en.wikipedia.org...

"Students held vigils and protests in solidarity with Bell with the support of some faculty. One of these students was future U.S. president Barack Obama, who introduced Bell at a protest at Harvard Law School.[5] Critics, including some faculty members, called Bell's methods counterproductive, and Harvard administration officials insisted they had already made enormous advances in hiring.[3] The story of his protest is detailed in his book Confronting Authority.

To some observers, Bell's lament about Harvard amounted to a call for the school to lower its academic qualifications in the quest to mold a diversified faculty on the campus. But Bell argued that academically able faculty were being ignored and that critics of diversity invariably underplay the value of a faculty that is broadly reflective of society, and, more importantly, that the credentials demanded by institutions like Harvard perpetuate the domination of white, well-off, middle-aged men. As he commented in the Boston Globe, "Let's look at a few qualifications--say civil rights experience ... that might allow [a chance at a tenured teaching position for] more folks here who, like me, maybe didn't go to the best law school but instead have made a real difference in the world."[3]
"
Finding out more about Bell will prob explain a lot more about why obama's support for him is so critical to more of who obama is today. Radical, troublemaker, etc...

Originally posted by muse7
I''d like for someone to come up with a piece of legislation that President Obama has pushed to pass that is considered "radical" in any way.

I take everything coming from Breitbart's site as a grain of salt.

What about Ron Paul meeting with white supremacists and approving the circulation of those newsletters?

Thats different...he is a republican.

it doesn't count if your a republican.

reply to post by Nana2

Classic "flowerchild" anarchism.Now with that congress previously mentioned and with money from"The Man" they can make the entire US into a government run commune where only the people they like have power,others need to be taught what's right.

reply to post by ownbestenemy


Are you saying I am a whacko? I was asking as I do not quite remember the deal on that. Perhaps I am a whacko though now that you mention it...

reply to post by Nana2
[mor

Thank you..an intelligent post/ WELCOME to the resistance

I don't give a rat's rump what Obama was thinking 30 years ago. Hell, Newt was still on his first wife back then. Dubya was relying on his dad to keep him from getting expelled. BFD.

This is wholly my opinion and I am not claiming it as fact, but rather a gut feeling. This nor any other video that will or will not be posted changes nothing. Obama will be re-elected due to a combination of factors, the main one being he will get 95% or more of the minority vote. The other being that I feel his opposition will not be strong enough to overcome the first factor. I am not an Obama supporter by any means. If votes really do count (ie it's not rigged), he will win and then the dogfight will ensue for the presidency in 2016. Hopefully there will be new blood on both sides that can get the US headed in the right direction.

Originally posted by antar
reply to post by ownbestenemy

 

Are you saying I am a whacko? I was asking as I do not quite remember the deal on that. Perhaps I am a whacko though now that you mention it...

Nope, what it means is actually attack the President -- regardless of his political affiliation, on his politics and his works. This is of course isn't to discount that any said person has gone through great lengths to hide who they actually are, but until then -- why not present recourse on the actions that you can tangibly attack?

Why go after the shady and mystical portions?

Originally posted by mastahunta

Originally posted by abe froman
reply to post by mastahunta

 

They swore him in using the same bible Abe Lincoln used. Let's not get silly.

They made a fake cover of that bible, so what was under it was the real Coran Saddam
used when he launched 9/11.

You're crazier than me. I love it.

John Stewart did a spot on this last night. Summed it up pretty nicely: irrelevant.