It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by theAmericanStory
Necessary Betrayal?
Originally posted by Hope4TheBest
reply to post by smithjustinb
IMO, trust is just as much a problem as beytrayal.
You can only be betrayed once you have trusted. I don't believe in trusting anymore. It's like hiding a land mine in your own bedroom. It has a 50/50 chance of blowing up in your face.
Instead, I prefer to have faith. Trust assumes that the situation or relationship will either go one way or the other. It's plurality at its core. Faith (I'm not talking about religion, but faith in people or situations) can see you through anything and is always there are long as you wish it. Trust vanishes the moment it is broken.
Originally posted by smithjustinb
Originally posted by ButtUglyToad
But for Sin to be credible, you must have a choice but if the choice you always make is the choice you were designed to make, is it you that made the choice or the designer that made the choice for you?
Ribbit
I don't mean sin in the theological sense of the word, and you're right, all sins are justified in that respect, and I agree. But betrayal cuts deeper than anything else I believe.
Originally posted by Hope4TheBest
reply to post by smithjustinb
Trust is a firm believe. Faith is complete confidence. By having faith, I am being what you would refer to as trustful. I just don't think that trust is a strong enough word, and therefore faith exists. Trust, IMO, is a weak (breakable) form of faith.