It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
reply to post by buster2010
TextThe end of days haven't happened yet so the land doesn't belong to the Jews now. Also it is against international law to acquire land by force. So Israel should relinquish all land they have stolen since 48 and also be forced to pay reparation to both Muslims and Christians they have persecuted.
Originally posted by Azadok
reply to post by rigel4
TextSome time ago I authored a thread with the Idea of relocating Israel to a more neutral location. At the time i got flamed and branded an "Antesemite", which i am not. With current developments spiralling out of control, and as usual Israel is the centre of the rhetoric, my question is do you the members still think that Israel would better of staying in the Middle East or moving to a new location.
You know what's compelling is this , we have all these viscous ignorant people that blame Israel for all the crap occurring in that area and how the Muslims are just the victims , those poor poor Palestinianss. The Muslims are a bunch of lying hypocrites that use their own people like pawns because of their HATE .
the mus
Ims profess to be oh so Holy and follow their Koran to the tee , the Palestinians teach their children how Israel stole the land and how they will regain it thru jihad . They start the hating process as soon as they can walk because we all know he consider Jews monkeys and apes.
So let's get to the real truth for all you people that have bought into islams lie , the Koran the Islam is allegedly compelled to follow is VERY VERY CLEAR ON WHO THE LAND BELONGS TO , THAT IS ISRAEL.
The verses in the Koran that pore this is 5:20 and 5:21 amongst others .
S why not ask the question lets. Relocat all the ARABS
I'm sure that would end very well. Jordan polls as being probably the second most rabidly fanatical Muslim country on the planet.
Originally posted by rigel4
Some time ago I authored a thread with the Idea of relocating Israel to a more
neutral location.
At the time i got flamed and branded an "Antesemite", which i am not.
With current developments spiralling out of control, and as usual Israel is the centre
of the rhetoric, my question is do you the members still think that Israel
would better of staying in the Middle East or moving to a new location.
I still think the relocation is a sound and peaceful option, the alternative is almost
certainly destruction at some point in the future.
I have been thinking recently that the second alternative is to ask The Israeli's by a
referendum, if they would like to be known as something other than "The Jewish State" as
being known an this seems to be a problem for a lot of other countries.
Here are a few other names that the country has been known by:-
Canaan
the United Kingdom
the Divided Kingdom
As always I am only exploring the possabilities for a peaceful solution to the most complex
Issue that exists today in world politics.
Below is a link to the original thread.
www.abovetopsecret.com...
.
Isn't about time for the sake of world peace,and the lives of millions in the Middle East, that Israel is relocated to somewhere a lot less hostile and volatile. Egypt, Iran, Hamas, Hezzbollah, Syria, the list is endless, the magnitude of the possable computations that would lead to Israel being destroyed along with other countries is mind bogglingly complex. Today there seems no way out, sooner or later, the inevitable will come to pass
edit on 7-3-2012 by rigel4 because: (no reason given)
What does the end of days have to do with the land the the Koran says belongs to Israel , the Arabs themselves have been lying to the world about this . There Koran is the final authority on all matters both personal , relic us and business . The Arabs know they are not suppose to be on that land according to their holy book and ignore it against Mohammed's teachings and Gods will . If they deny this they are worse than infidel dogs and should be beheaded for insulting Islam and Mohammed.
What right did Britain have to give you somebody elses country?
Originally posted by lonewolf19792000
You're right, Israel does need to be relocated.
To the rest of Jordan which used to belong to it, but was usurped by the Arabs after Hadrian Caesar exterminated the Israelites, the ones he didn't enslave and the few who escaped because they were in the fields with their sheep.
Absolutely, let Israel relocate...and spread to the whole of ancient Israel and the Arabs can go back to Saudi Arabia where they came from, or Babylon.
Sounds like a great idea to me, let the mass deportations commence!
Maybe then they will be able to rebuild the temple in peace instead of having muslim riot anytime a jew dares to whisper a prayer on Mt Moriah.edit on 7-3-2012 by lonewolf19792000 because: (no reason given)
So...does that mean you are going to give Arkansas back to the Choctaw and Natchez?
Originally posted by theubermensch
North America is the logical place for them to go.
They are not 'little Satan"
They are one and the same. North America is the place for them. In the middle of a desert.
Originally posted by FissionSurplus
As another poster pointed out, it is a lost cause. Dragging God into it and saying that he is on your side is just pathetic, as well as unprovable.
Originally posted by rigel4
Some time ago I authored a thread with the Idea of relocating Israel to a more
neutral location.
At the time i got flamed and branded an "Antesemite", which i am not.
With current developments spiralling out of control, and as usual Israel is the centre
of the rhetoric, my question is do you the members still think that Israel
would better of staying in the Middle East or moving to a new location.
I still think the relocation is a sound and peaceful option, the alternative is almost
certainly destruction at some point in the future.
I have been thinking recently that the second alternative is to ask The Israeli's by a
referendum, if they would like to be known as something other than "The Jewish State" as
being known an this seems to be a problem for a lot of other countries.
Here are a few other names that the country has been known by:-
Canaan
the United Kingdom
the Divided Kingdom
As always I am only exploring the possabilities for a peaceful solution to the most complex
Issue that exists today in world politics.
Below is a link to the original thread.
www.abovetopsecret.com...
.
Isn't about time for the sake of world peace,and the lives of millions in the Middle East, that Israel is relocated to somewhere a lot less hostile and volatile. Egypt, Iran, Hamas, Hezzbollah, Syria, the list is endless, the magnitude of the possable computations that would lead to Israel being destroyed along with other countries is mind bogglingly complex. Today there seems no way out, sooner or later, the inevitable will come to pass
edit on 7-3-2012 by rigel4 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by lonewolf19792000
reply to post by milominderbinder
So...does that mean you are going to give Arkansas back to the Choctaw and Natchez?
I am just one man, i have no say in that matter. I'm decendant of the cherokee nation, i'm here because we were forced into this area during the trail of tears and then when white people took the reservation they gave to us here we were moved to the rest of the tribe in Oklahoma, those who weren't allowed to stay in the south east.
Should everyones land be given back to them? Yes it should, but it will not happen so your arguement is weak. This is a circular arguement and will go nowhere.
The UN recognition of Israel.
...Now what?
Is it perhaps reasonable to assert that Israel claim to land they lost 2000 yrs ago isn't as valid as the Palestinian land which Israel is illegally and unlawfully occupying this very moment?