It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Phage
Sure, delete it from two images and forget to do it in one.
Here's a high resolution version of 1098. Judge for yourself whether it's something on the Moon or something in the image. In making that judgement, look around the image a bit.
www.lpi.usra.edu...
Many of the scans of photos taken during the missions were done from the original film. These scans are being done by NASA Johnson, with some post-processing by Kipp Teague. The film is scanned at 4096 x 4096 pixels per image. Kipp reduces each digital image to approximately 2350 x 2350 pixels (equivalent to 300 dpi) and does minor adjustments of levels to ensure that (1) brightly lit areas of lunar soil are neutral grey, (2) objects with known colors (such as the CDR stripes or the LCRU blankets) look right, and (3) information in bright or dark areas is not lost. These images from original film are indicated by the notation 'OF300' in the image description. In each case, a 900 x 900 pixel version is also provided.
Originally posted by Phage
Sure, delete it from two images and forget to do it in one.
Originally posted by zorgon
Originally posted by Phage
Sure, delete it from two images and forget to do it in one.
Well come on Phage we all know how incompetent NASA is... I mean they keep getting hacked by leaving systems unsecured... they lose a lap top that has the operating codes for the ISS...
Seriously I can see they easily miss some details with that airbrush
But Shrike doing a Lunar anomaly thread? I about fell off my chair...
Originally posted by mainidh
reply to post by The Shrike
IIRC, a lot of the images that were originally taken were developed on earth from negatives. I could be entirely wrong in that, it's just something that rings a bell. And from that, a lot of earthly dust/debris/etc was effectively 'photographed' post processing.
snip
Originally posted by The Shrike
I removed the contents of the thread because I realized I erred in my assumption. I apologize for the inconvenience.
edit on 7-3-2012 by The Shrike because: I erred.edit on 7-3-2012 by The Shrike because: To add comment.