It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Azadok
They were offered equality thru civil union but that was not good enough
now they got some bullsh * t law passed where home schoolers can not teach that homo sexual behavior is a sin if the homeschoolers religion believes so .
In this republic the majority is suppose to be able to have the last word in a legal sense.
Originally posted by Azadok
reply to post by Annee
You liberals are destroying this country , I bet you are all for beastiality thinking that's normal . You know what I hope sharia law comes to America for a short time and cleans house.
Originally posted by Azadok
They were offered equality thru civil union but that was not good enough , now they got some bullsh * t law passed where home schoolers can not teach that homo sexual behavior is a sin if the homeschoolers religion believes so . That's Bullard another example of reverse discrimination by a minority against a majority . In this republic the majority is suppose to be able to have the last word in a legal sense.
Originally posted by Azadok
You liberals are destroying this country , I bet you are all for beastiality thinking that's normal . You know what I hope sharia law comes to America for a short time and cleans house.
Originally posted by ~Vixen~
Seriously, how does it matter what the relationship is called? It seems to me that you're using a single word to justify wanton discrimination.
Originally posted by ollncasino
Originally posted by ~Vixen~
Seriously, how does it matter what the relationship is called? It seems to me that you're using a single word to justify wanton discrimination.
If it doesn't matter then why is the gay movement pushing to call gay civil unions, 'marriages'?
Why don't they just keep on calling them 'civil unions'.
You can define your marriage any way you want.
You can not define someone elses.
Please explain how the rights of the "majority" are being destroyed.
Why does the majority feel the need to deny a minority equality?
Originally posted by Rockpuck
reply to post by Annee
You can define your marriage any way you want.
You can not define someone elses.
So you would redefine marriage for the majority of people to appease the minority of people. Destroying their beliefs because your self absorbed concept of right and wrong trumps those beliefs?
Gotcha.
Please explain how the rights of the "majority" are being destroyed.
If the majority of people believe that the word marriage has a religious connotation then by forcing those people to redefine their own belief to accommodate the alternative views of a slim minority of people then you effectively destroy their own religious beliefs.
It's not denying them the benefits of marriage, the actual legal contract.. but the simple word for it. Call it a civil union..
Why does the majority feel the need to deny a minority equality?
Maybe I should decide to redefine Jesus and tell religious people to get over it.. since they need to bow to the wills of the select minority.
People like you honestly disgust me..
Originally posted by Rockpuck
So you would redefine marriage for the majority of people to appease the minority of people. Destroying their beliefs because your self absorbed concept of right and wrong trumps those beliefs?
Originally posted by Rockpuck
Maybe I should decide to redefine Jesus and tell religious people to get over it.. since they need to bow to the wills of the select minority.
Originally posted by Annee
Originally posted by Rockpuck
So you would redefine marriage for the majority of people to appease the minority of people. Destroying their beliefs because your self absorbed concept of right and wrong trumps those beliefs?
We are a secular government. Legal Marriage is a secular government contract.
Equal Rights in a government applies to all. ALL are of the secular government.
Majority is not relevant.
Your belief is not my problem.
Originally posted by Rockpuck
Maybe I should decide to redefine Jesus and tell religious people to get over it.. since they need to bow to the wills of the select minority.
All the gays I've know are Christian. They will be married in their Christian church in the eyes of their Savior Jesus Christ - - as well as making it legal with the government contract Marriage License.
There are plenty of Christian churches who truly understand the teachings of Jesus.
edit on 8-3-2012 by Annee because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by kaylaluv
Here's what it boils down to. People who say they are fine with gays, just don't call it marriage - are homophobes and bigots - pure and simple. They are using religion to cover up their bigotry.
Originally posted by ollncasino
Do parents really want gay sex education in schools?
As a parent I can say that I don't.
Originally posted by dagon
I still maintain that this wouldn't be on the table if the govt. hadn't created the problem in the first place by giving tax breaks to hetero married couples. Seems to me the rest of the arguments here are philosophical masturbation. It also seems to me that both sides want attention by screaming at one another, and to force their respective belief systems on each other. That is not a way to reach a successful conclusion. Notice I didn't say 'compromise'.
Originally posted by Azadok
reply to post by Annee
You liberals are destroying this country , I bet you are all for beastiality thinking that's normal . You know what I hope sharia law comes to America for a short time and cleans house.
Originally posted by cuervo
Well... it's a matter of prejudice vs liberty. So, yeah... it is, in fact, black and white. The same people who are against equal marriage rights are the same people who are completely paranoid of "Sharia" law. Ironic.
Originally posted by blueorder
erm, I don't think that is ironic, unless Sharia Law was a law specifically forbidding gay couples being allowed to marry.
Originally posted by blueorder
Also, the "same people", so what, every person who oppose it is afraid of Sharia- seriously, everyone of them, how do you know so many people