It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by samkent
reply to post by NWOwned
I'm pretty much convinced the Pentagon scene was "staged".
Uhhh If you were in charge of staging the Pentagon hit would you choose the side closest to the expressway?
I mean it would take some time to carry out all the bits and pieces and place them on the lawn.
How many cars would pass by during that amount of time?
How many right seat passengers travel that same stretch of road everyday to work looking out the window?
If I were planning the hit, I would have the plane hit the inner rings first traveling outward.
That way I would have plenty of time to set up the debris hidden from the public.
But then again there's all those pesky witnesses that actually saw the plane cross the expressway. So your being convinced otherwise goes out the window.
The later released 5 frame gate cam video. It shows a smoke trail. A smoke trail no witness mentions. A smoke trail hypothesized to come from the right engine of 'the plane' hitting a light pole. There's even an animation of it made by some company, of a jet crossing the Pentagon lawn with a smoking right engine.
Only problem with it is no witness mentioned it.
Originally posted by Danbones
reply to post by GenRadek
you used it because you have NO evidence to support your position
Originally posted by samkent
reply to post by NWOwned
Why are conspiracy theories so complicated? You would have to involve so many other people to cover all the events that lead up to that day.
Remember there are images and video of broken plane parts on the ground but no images or video of intact plane parts in the air, i.e., an airplane in flight.
Also look at the green spaces in front of that blue block.
That's where the Army auditors were working on the missing trillions receipts.
Originally posted by LaBTop
(Also on a real SoC impact path, the plane would not have a chance to get through the whole 3 Rings, it would also have reached only the back wall of the E-Ring.)
The gouge in the generator cabin's roof gives away the real angle of attack, of about 80°. And not the 42° angle....
Originally posted by ProudBird
reply to post by LaBTop
You keep going on about the "gouge" in the generator? And its "angle"?
Yet, ignore ALL of the other evidence that supports the real impact angle, and the actual approach angle?
This is called "confirmation bias". (And, did the generator move, perhaps, when it was struck?? Did you address this, if so, can you point it out?)
As to another reply......you're in your car, in traffic. Maybe you do have a camera there with you. The jet is coming in at over 800 feet per second.
How many people are fast enough to react in time, to such an event? Think about it......
Originally posted by ProudBird
reply to post by LaBTop
The gouge in the generator cabin's roof gives away the real angle of attack, of about 80°. And not the 42° angle....
Did, or did not, the generator get moved on impact?
Further down in the Post I am replying to (click the link), the diagram from the accurate PBPR (Pentagon Building Performance Report) shows the actual (accurate) damage path inside the Pentagon.....but someone (OP? Was that you??) added an outline of a B-757 at the WRONG angle, for some unknown "reason"??
I am beginning to think this is a waste of time....this thread.......