reply to post by lonewolf19792000
With all due respect, I enjoy reading posts like yours.
First, you come forward as one of those people who think Iran is actually a serious threat, which by itself undermines all the rest of your
Then, you claim that they actually want weapon grade uranium, when they have showed nothing to make people believe that. And if I would confront you
with the same old question of "why shouldn't they own a nuke?", you will provably come forward with the usual arguments that it's a dangerous
regime and all that.
To me, this is all laughable. It's hilarious to see how people get lost in logic just because they want to justify their opinions and points of view,
beliefs if you want to call them that.
People claim that Iran is a retarded country, that they would be unable to retain a nuke without using it, and thus, creating utter chaos in the
world. And in the same paragraph, people are brave enough to imply that Iran, the same retarded country that can't be responsible enough to hold a
nuke in their pockets, was able to develop and put into function a nuclear weapons program, one of the most advanced things that a country can achieve
in terms of technology.
If they are so retarded, how did they manage to fool everyone? How did they manage to develop effective nuclear weapons when ALL previous countries
needed at least several bomb tests, that were detected by every other nation in the world, plus IAEA watchdogs?
The logic behind Iran's accusations is at the very least, pathetic.
I'm not judging, nor criticizing your opinion. For all I know, I would agree with you if I had the same information you provably base yourself upon.
I'm not calling you ignorant by any means.
But, I'm one of those people that devours newspapers, and I'm perfectly aware of how they are manipulated. So I usually go "left to right" in the
globe. I read US media, then European, some African and then I read both Middle East and Eastern Europe media.
In the end, you can take your own conclusions, and I assure you, that the most common conclusion that people who educate them-selfs about world
politics, DO NOT consider Iran a threat. All their moves have been pro-peace so far, and if people want to accuse them of having special agents and
proxy terrorist groups, then people also need to accuse 90% of the world nations, since every single country has them, directly or indirectly.
People should ask them-selfs why other people who have nothing to gain
from the destruction of Iran, don't actually want an Iran war. This
thread isn't about a stupid loud mouth like Alex Jones or whatever. These are respected, retired Generals that are trying to give a voice of reason
to their effective leader and president.
When the people that command soldiers in battle start waving flags saying "we don't need this war", people should