Pink Slime For School Lunch: , page 1


Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 8 times


reply posted on 6-3-2012 @ 02:01 PM by this_is_who_we_are
reply to post by Jameela



This paragraph from the article stands out to me:

"We originally called it soylent pink," microbiologist Carl Custer, who worked at the Food Safety Inspection Service for 35 years, told The Daily. "We looked at the product and we objected to it because it used connective tissues instead of muscle. It was simply not nutritionally equivalent [to ground beef]. My main objection was that it was not meat."
www.huffingtonpost.com...


Yum.
edit on 3/6/2012 by this_is_who_we_are because: typo



reply posted on 6-3-2012 @ 02:03 PM by Jameela
reply to post by this_is_who_we_are



Yeah I know, this is definitely not food, and whats sadder is children in poor communities sometimes school lunches and breakfasts are the most nutritious meals they will get in a day, and these have no nutritional value at all. Its not right.



reply posted on 6-3-2012 @ 02:11 PM by Jameela
reply to post by Unrealised



I agree that any parent will have to start packing a lunch for their child, and from the look of the article even if it is only a bowl of rice it is going to be healthier, safer and more nutritious than what the schools will be offering.

But sadly one of the biggest misconceptions about America is that it is full of wealthy people, there are many children here who might go hungry if it was not for the school lunch program. I have seen this with my eyes.


reply posted on 6-3-2012 @ 02:18 PM by Unrealised
Originally posted by Jameela
reply to
post by Unrealised




But sadly one of the biggest misconceptions about America is that it is full of wealthy people


Oh, I certainly don't have that misconception.


Teach the kids via community programs to grow their own food. Have cooking classes in school where they eat what they make in class.

Anything.

If you really have something against the school's food program, can't the local council become involved?

If this happened in Australia, people would be fired.


reply posted on 6-3-2012 @ 02:34 PM by CagliostroTheGreat
Originally posted by Jameela
reply to
post by Unrealised



I agree that any parent will have to start packing a lunch for their child, and from the look of the article even if it is only a bowl of rice it is going to be healthier, safer and more nutritious than what the schools will be offering.

But sadly one of the biggest misconceptions about America is that it is full of wealthy people, there are many children here who might go hungry if it was not for the school lunch program. I have seen this with my eyes.

speaking from expierience here.

i was one of those kids. getting to eat breakfast and lunch were the best part of my day. now to think the kids that share that predicament are going to have to eat this garbage is just gut wrenching.


reply posted on 6-3-2012 @ 02:49 PM by Jameela
Well I have been doing some digging on the internet and found a reply from the meat companies in reply to that show against pick slime, I think its only fair to tell their side of the story too


Stating some of the science behind the process, Nunes wrote, "Ammonium hydroxide is naturally found in proteins such as beef, pork and chicken. What the Beef Products process does is increase the amount of ammonium hydroxide in the lean beef to elevate its overall pH and make the product inhospitable to the survival of pathogens such as E. coli O157:H7 and Salmonella."

Nunes was concerned that unfounded public perceptions were being used "to cast a negative light on a process that is proven to be safe and has been designed to protect consumers." "The situation Beef Products finds itself in is not isolated," he wrote. "Other processes, such as the use of bisphenol A, are also being challenged. Food safety is not a natural, pure or simple process and products will be less safe if effective processes are shunned for reasons that have more to do with perception than science."* Making sure our food supply is as safe as possible requires the use of some sophisticated science, and emotional reactions by people who speak before they understand the process will delay acceptance at best. The worst case, though, is their unwarranted and unsubstantiated fears can stop needed and proven scientific advances cold, exposing thousands of people to easily avoidable illnesses and death.

www.foodsafetynews.com...

It still sounds disgusting, and since all the fast food companies stopped purchasing it I am personally still not convinced of its nutritional value and perfect safety, with many people having cancer in families where cancers did not exist and other such diseases you have to wonder if it comes from all this food processing.
edit on 6-3-2012 by Jameela because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 6-3-2012 @ 04:06 PM by smyleegrl
reply to post by Jameela



Money is the motivating factor in a majority of public education decisions.

Let me be clear: schools are not making money. No one is profiting from the school's decisions, except maybe for the contractors.

My school just wants to break even. We do seven or eight fundraisers every year. That money is used to purchase necessities, such as paper, pencils, books, etc.

One person mentioned letting the schools grow their own food. Our school actually does that, although not on a major scale. But we do have a garden with various fruits and veggies. A few years ago our school won a grant from the FDA. We got several thousand dollars to purchase fruits and veggies for a year. That was wonderful! The kids got to try a lot of exotic foods. In fact, they usually chose the fruit over the junk food.

I don't think the food situation will really change anytime soon, sad to say. The simple fact is the pink slime is cheaper than regular beef....so that's what we'll get.

I feel so angry when I hear how much our country spends on war... and how little on our future.


reply posted on 6-3-2012 @ 04:09 PM by Ophiuchus 13
reply to post by Jameela



I think its a good idea to have this kind of flesh for eating it may just need a few years to perfect in color and taste maching. in the long run it helps the animals being eaten now by humans who feel they are at top of food chain. But if others came around it would provide good argument that if humans can develop into non animal eating beings why cant others Although the testing on the school children can be risky but I guess since they are the upcomming population then having them onboard would help future activities in dealing with the ingestation of animals over modified energy. Think about all the future movies that would sho a paste or pill type of food for the inhabitants. So hope they can make it taste better and more neutritional for those eating.
edit on 3/6/12 by Ophiuchus 13 because: (no reason given)

Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^



Norway To Open Century Old Package
  Posted 19 days ago with 127 member flags
Blame The Real Bad Guys - The Powers Behind Super Powers
  Posted 18 days ago with 65 member flags
19 Yr Old Hostage Gunned Down By Police While Escaping Captor
  Posted 8 days ago with 53 member flags
DHS Source: “It’s going hot”
  Posted 14 days ago with 49 member flags
Police Shoot Another 911 Caller In Her Own Backyard
  Posted 19 days ago with 46 member flags
The Oatmeal\'s Tesla Fundraiser Pushes Past $1.1M
  Posted 15 days ago with 44 member flags