posted on Mar, 11 2012 @ 09:06 PM
A bit of "sabe lo todo."
I'm showing the intentions of "think tanks" and hint at their financing - while you stick with formal declarations. No educated person will believe
these reports are not expected to form a pool of information aimed at policymakers.) Yes, maybe they are not on the payroll of the gov't. They are
no the payroll of those who made the largest campaign contributions as well as set up movements like the Tea Party. The payroll of those that do the
largest media campaigns for war policies. It is ignorant to deny these - they are well documented elsewhere on hundeds of pages here. Murdoch? Fox
News? Kocs Brothers? The Bank that sank Greece?
They are like script writers for movies studios. Sure, until it's official, you can't tell FOR SURE that the actual policy comes from Brookings and
three others. But as soon as it is proclaimed, there are telling similarities. Remember People for a New American Century?
In Iran's case, in earlier threads, you were desperate to show intentions versus formality. So that is what mattered then for you - whatever strategy
promotes your war agenda. Like Ahmad said this and that
(where we proved on every second page that he didn't.) Well the intention behind COULD be what you said. But you stuck to formality while making
glaring formal mistakes - Ahmad never said "wipe israel off the map." That does not mean many RG's do not say something like that openly. They may
say "# the US" evey night when they drink their illegal vodkas. There I would agreed with you. But you gave not a chance.
Seems like you are serving the hawk Israeli side. Well, serve them well then! We should not stick to form when we can read between the lines. I accept
that. From any poster. Except I might read different things between the lines. You are free to write more on how you personally feel about the news
The mission statements for one of thes dink dongs should actually read: Well, you know how it goes, guys, the truth is we're getting X million USD
from Koch Bros monthly in gold as long as we can churn out more intellectual and a more popular justification scenarios for a quick attack on Iran,
'cause that' the command, that's what Koch wants. He also said something about a gold temple being burned to ashes too but let that be handled at
the Department of Religious Studies. Anyway, not now John, I'm just terribly busy proving Iran has the worst human rights record even though in
countries not so far away they kidnap kids to make them rebel soldiers - freely to rape and torture to death any adult outside of the sect. F****
them, there we'd never go, we want Iran's bourse and possibly its oil by mid-2012, Plus our allies want to nuke them so actually they would prefer a
NUCLEAR IRAN - so that they can blast the place to smmithereens.
Well I've been an employed writer myself. Not for this kind of money though.
Ask your handler how much would it cost to have well-informed arcticles without a relentless push for power to be published on ATS: I could argue for
a war in Iran tommorrow somewhat better than you. You sound like a self-educated person who knows everything better than anyone else.
Am I corresponding with a Chief of Staff here in disguise?
I have LENMRNQ-8 just in case.