It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
FireballStorm... Excellent update, and thanks for that. It's all very sound information, and makes perfect sense.... Excepting the asteroids being knocked out of the ecliptic from the asteroid belt. It would take tremendous energy to knock one out on a path that saw it pulled back in on a north to south vector; energy in both the ejection and the gravitational pull back in.
It's hard to explain what I'm trying to say, but it would have to go WAY out in the perpendicular to come back in at that angle if it wasn't extra-solar. Incidentally, are we approaching the galactic plane from under it (our perspective), because I don't know at all.
Originally posted by djyorkie
The thing that struck me as unusual about his account of what he saw, is that he remembers seeing clouds, and that the object "looked" to be below cloud leve, and lasted about 15 seconds.
So could this really be this low, and still travel the length of the uk?
Originally posted by Mogget
FireballStorm... Excellent update, and thanks for that. It's all very sound information, and makes perfect sense.... Excepting the asteroids being knocked out of the ecliptic from the asteroid belt. It would take tremendous energy to knock one out on a path that saw it pulled back in on a north to south vector; energy in both the ejection and the gravitational pull back in.
It's hard to explain what I'm trying to say, but it would have to go WAY out in the perpendicular to come back in at that angle if it wasn't extra-solar. Incidentally, are we approaching the galactic plane from under it (our perspective), because I don't know at all.
You are forgetting that the Earth is moving in its orbit around the Sun. A meteor could appear to be moving from north to south as viewed from the surface of Earth, but this doesn't mean that it has an orbit perpendicular to that of our planet. In fact, the orbital inclination could be a lot shallower than you might think.edit on 7-3-2012 by Mogget because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by boyg2004
This is the thing that holds 'wrong' with this for me. The reports don't entirely add up with sound science.
Originally posted by boyg2004
I heard it was green, and reports range from 15 seconds to 2-3 minutes.
My purpose, as I have said before, is to collect everything that is known on the subject of British Meteorites ; to establish by means of copious references every fact relative to each recorded fall ; and to inquire into all doubtful instances, so as to ascertain, if possible, whether their authenticity can be proved, and to expunge them from the list if they can be shown to be the results of errors.
The doubtful instances of meteoric falls may be classed under four general heads :-
1st. A meteor has been seen apparently to fall, and a search has been made where it seemed to descend. The results of those searches have included nodules of pyrite, fragments of scoriae, hematite, and ordinary pebbles, all distinctly terrestrial, but which have been described as "Meteorites"
(continued at the source)
Originally posted by boyg2004
I'm positive a report came in that it changed direction too, but I'll have to dig for that again.
"It then reappeared as it continued across the sky, seemingly changing directions slightly - as if around a 15 degree corner.
"It then also seemed to go lower down in the sky and then passed out of our vision after another 10 seconds or so.
Originally posted by tracehd1
When I seen the BBC video...1 of the videos showed something lit up w/ a tail, but the other video looks like a UFO. There's no tail to it...it looks round...and it's just flying over our skies like it looks like it knows where it's going...