It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ButtUglyToad
As a human, you sure are a waste of a beautiful mind.
You should shuck your human skin, get out of that Edgar Suit, and take a closer look at what's going on, since you might be surprised what the truth is because what you think the truth is, isn't but in doesn't matter in totality, since you always wake up from these knowing the truth.
There is no sp00n!
There is no y0u!
You are living a Dream, thus, the y0u does kNot exist!
Ribbit
Ps: You are also incorrect about black holes. Science now knows matter is also being EJECTED out of black holes, sew they don't just suck, they spit too. Plus, it's magnetics that draws the matter in, kNot gravity, although magnetics is also the source of gravity sew it can be said gravity is what draws in the matter but it's kNot the correct way to say it but you don't know the truth about gravity sew how could you possibly know the truth about black holes?
Originally posted by NorEaster
Originally posted by ButtUglyToad
As a human, you sure are a waste of a beautiful mind.
I'm going to assume that this is some sort of compliment.
Originally posted by SparkOfSparks6
If consciousness came from time, it wouldn't exist.
Originally posted by SparkOfSparks6
reply to post by ButtUglyToad
Yes it would work in reverse, since time is the linear creation of our perspectives of reality.
Originally posted by ButtUglyToad
Originally posted by smithjustinb
The ultimate objective truth is that we don't exist. The ultimate subjective truth is that we do.
Actually, the ultimate objective truth is that light is the only thing that is objectively real. When you die (cease to exist) that's why you see the light. Light is the only thing that objectively exists. Death is the emergence into objective reality.
My question would be, what if neither are applicable, then what Reality dew you have left to fall back on?
Ribbit
Originally posted by midicon
reply to post by ButtUglyToad
"God/Source Thinks and Time happens!" - Old Toad Proverb
God/Source doesn't think...it's we who think.
Perhaps God/Source just observes.
And of course we think we know but we don't know anything at all about God/Source.
And why not pause for a moment...and not think any thoughts at all.
And in that moment you will still be conscious of self-not self.
Consciousness of self does not require thought.
Awareness of self does not require thought.
And of course God/Source is outside of time and thought.
But thats another story.
Originally posted by smithjustinb
Originally posted by ButtUglyToad
Originally posted by smithjustinb
The ultimate objective truth is that we don't exist. The ultimate subjective truth is that we do.
Actually, the ultimate objective truth is that light is the only thing that is objectively real. When you die (cease to exist) that's why you see the light. Light is the only thing that objectively exists. Death is the emergence into objective reality.
My question would be, what if neither are applicable, then what Reality dew you have left to fall back on?
Ribbit
All is one is consciousness is light. There are many manifested forms of the one essence that is light.
Light is the one form of consciousness that is objectively true regardless of subjective relativism. All forms are relative to other forms except light which is constant for all. Light is the one and only truth. All is consciousness. Consciousness is the inner nature of all matter and energy. Consciousness is internally true at all times and only externally true in the form of light.
The universe and everything in it is over 99% empty space. We don't see emptiness because we are conscious/relative forms existing within the realm of relative positioning of our size. We see the emptiness of larger systems but not of smaller. If we did not exist in our current form, i.e. dead, we would see the only thing that is externally true, and that is light.
Originally posted by ILikeStars
Sometimes i wonder if the future and the present were at war.... technically who started it first?
Originally posted by ILikeStars
alpha and omega, me be alpha
a................o............me...b....a
aomeba..
Originally posted by voicefromtheages
reply to post by ButtUglyToad
Does it take 3 to create?
1. neutral
2. passive
3. active
1. darkness
2. light
3. spark
1. neutron
2. proton
3. electron
1. space
2. molecular clouds
3. gravitational force
1. rock
2. water
3. erosion
1. female
2. male
3. spark
Originally posted by ILikeStars
reply to post by ButtUglyToad
depends upon what they are fighting for. You assume it would be a scorched earth scenario. What if the future was at war with the present with other goals, other objectives? This is all conjecture mind you, I certainly couldn't prove this scenario exists as far as I know.
Another possibility could be if the very distant future were at war with the present, would they remember us being their ancestors? Our own history seems to have some unknowns to it and it is thousands of years old. Hundreds of thousands or millions of years and who knows what earthlings could be or look like.
just some thoughts i thought i would throw out there my frog friend. Oh, and incidently i did buy two tree frogs for my terrarium yesterday. They are doing good. ribbit.
Originally posted by ButtUglyToad
Originally posted by voicefromtheages
reply to post by ButtUglyToad
Does it take 3 to create?
1. neutral
2. passive
3. active
1. darkness
2. light
3. spark
1. neutron
2. proton
3. electron
1. space
2. molecular clouds
3. gravitational force
1. rock
2. water
3. erosion
1. female
2. male
3. spark
I don't understand the question, since sum of the tri-topics are incorrectly aligned.
Ribbit
Originally posted by voicefromtheages
Originally posted by ButtUglyToad
Originally posted by voicefromtheages
reply to post by ButtUglyToad
Does it take 3 to create?
1. neutral
2. passive
3. active
1. darkness
2. light
3. spark
1. neutron
2. proton
3. electron
1. space
2. molecular clouds
3. gravitational force
1. rock
2. water
3. erosion
1. female
2. male
3. spark
I don't understand the question, since sum of the tri-topics are incorrectly aligned.
Ribbit
That's your problem.
Good luck.