Operation: Destroy Ignorance: HAARP,Chem-Trails.

reply to post by Aloysius the Gaul


Aslong as sound comes through the reciever thats all I need to say!

Doesn't matter the form sound is coming!

reply to post by metalholic


You mean you think you know more than physicists and scientists that research this for a living.

So you need to write a scientific paper and show all these people they have no clue what they are talking about and publish it.

Then you can actually see what you really know instead of what you think you know.

reply to post by tsurfer2000h


The mechanical vibrations that can be interpreted as sound are able to travel through all forms of matter: gases, liquids, solids, and plasmas. The matter that supports the sound is called the medium. Sound cannot travel through a vacuum.

Last I checked the universe or atleast are solar system is made up of Gas,Liquids,Solids,and Plasmas is it not?

You still haven't seen it yet have you?

reply to post by metalholic

Its as simple as a light that hums at 60 hertz,
but hard to explain to the educated ones!

reply to post by Gmoneycricket


Well your ears are recievers that pick up the em waves we are calling sound waves in fact it's the same as radio waves.

Many will not understand this because they cannot compare biological body parts to mechanical ones. But infact they work the same way!

reply to post by metalholic

I am not bound as the debunker,
I can hear the singing in the wires and the sound of silence, but feel something there.

I think they are calling it dark matter?
I did not see one response to dark matter in the universe,
in regards to sound waves.

For those who may have forgotten, this is the topic:

Operation: Destroy Ignorance: HAARP,Chem-Trails

This is the only reminder that will be issued.
You are responsible for your own posts.

We expect civility and decorum within all topics - Please Review This Link.

Go After the Ball, Not the Player!

reply to post by metalholic


They have not proved there is no atoms in a vacuum,
and atoms move,
so with my simple mind,
I understand what you are saying,
in my understanding of my universe,
we all don't see or hear it the same way.
What is sound and sight in your universe, and can the debunker prove his is the same as mine?
Only if he wants a grant for money from the government, is my believe.
Science is greed, in the name of grants, grants is a reality only proven with a dollar amount, and not fact.

Before science there was man,
he began the truth of experience that led to science.
But now science claims it has moved past the point of experienced men.

reply to post by Gmoneycricket


The fact that I can sit here and listen to Judas Priest from my windows media player that is being played on my mechanical computer and is sending em waves, radio waves through the speakers proves that my ears are therefore em recievers proving that em waves are sound!

The biggest threat to science is life.
Because once life understands that it can exist without science,
How does science exist without life support?
We have only 150 years of contrail generator experience.
But life has billions of years of experience, if our understanding of time is right.

reply to post by Gmoneycricket


Can time ever be right if what is 5 to me might be 2 to you?

The farther out you go the faster time goes. The farther inward you go the slower it goes.

So all in all is time ever really consistant. Or does it only apply to the directly effected.

Time is infinite. But what is the right time to one is the wrong time to another. Or am I still on the wrond side of the international date line.

Good philosophy!

reply to post by metalholic

Same as what they call a contrail,
what we see could just last a day,
but if we die the next morning, it was a lifetime.

Trying to explain what someone see's in the sky,
lasts minutes, hours, days, or sometimes
a lifetime.

So when we talk chemtrails ,
are we only talking about whats in our atmosphere,
or as members of the universe,
and our little rocket trails in space.
So have they proved we have not left
any chemtrails in our universe, including space?

Deny ignorance lets look at what they leave in space!

So is it harmless water vapor that propels us in space?

I know their answer,
they will respond with,
you don't understand what the chemtrail conspiracy is.
But they have not proved there is no life, in the vacuum of space.

But my answer is,
Atoms are a part of life.
disturbed in the wrong way,
could equal, the end of life as we know it.
Chemtrails
is anytime man has left chemicals and killed life.

And just a thought to sleep on,
Have you ever heard of a science test of, contrails and its effects on mice.
It appears all facts are,
it was tested on humans first,
this time.
But I will re-track the statement if you can find me one test of,
The Effects of Contrails on Mice!

reply to post by Gmoneycricket


Every space shuttle and high altitude rocket leaves a chemical trail. They are not the same type of chemtrail that we think of associated with jet exhaust and persistent contrails.

But they are absolutely under a broader definition of the word a "chemtrail"

Not only are the exhaust from rockets a chemtrail but some of them carry chemical payloads, like barium, that are released in the stratosphere. Barium is an excellent tracer element. Your doctor will have you drink it before trying to x-ray your intestinal track. It's used in the atmosphere in almost the same way.

Chemistry of Barium released at high altitudes

Barium - Public Health


David Keith refers to space shuttle exhaust at 0:50 seconds to 1:30 minute mark


Major Chemtrail beginning at 1:35 minute

Originally posted by ThirdRock69
reply to post by Gmoneycricket

 

Every space shuttle and high altitude rocket leaves a chemical trail. They are not the same type of chemtrail that we think of associated with jet exhaust and persistent contrails.

But they are absolutely under a broader definition of the word a "chemtrail"

The only "broad definition" is that a chemtail is something deliberately released into the atmosphere OTHER THAN normal exhaust, for some secret purpose.

Space shuttle exhaust is not secret, and IS just normal exhaust - clearly it does not fall undr "the broadr definition" of "chemtrail" at all.

It is certainly a chemical trail - but then so is your outgoing breath. And while "chemtrail" may be a word constructed in a similar manner to contrail, it has a completely different relationship to the 2 words that have been used to make it.

Attempts by chemtrail believers to widen the definition like you just have to give some validity to the fantasy are common enough because there is no other way to show that "chemtrails" actually exit other than to try to pull trivial chemical trails into it.

A "chemtrial" is, supposedly,

Originally posted by metalholic
reply to post by Aloysius the Gaul

 

Aslong as sound comes through the reciever thats all I need to say!

Doesn't matter the form sound is coming!

Sound doesn't come through the receiver - more demonstration of ignorance.

Radio waves come through the receiver.

Sound is GENERATED by the speaker.

reply to post by Aloysius the Gaul


You can call it trivial. I call it facts.

You can't dispute the fact that the shuttle exhaust is a chemtrail.

Try all you want. You'll just make yourself look even more ignorant.

Trying to use a persons breath as an analogy for chemtrails is the most ridiculous comment by you yet.

You think by trying to trivialize the facts you hope it gets ignored. Typical chicken