It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by liquidsmoke206
reply to post by artistpoet
Wow AP, I'm impressed, for the first time you've actually attempted to show some evidence for your position. However, the letter you posted would seem to support what I have been saying, that the guide stones are in opposition to the NWO. Read:
Which brings me to the Georgia Guide stones, and the 80 percent population reduction idea, and I realised that this is actually a very good thing, because all those undesirables are obviously the ones they are talking about. They are the ones that need governance or removal to allow the thinking, responsible ones such as ourselves to regain our freedom from imposed tyranny.
So while these people are still out there, we will have to deal with the government fictions imposing their policy upon us, because they can't tell the sheep from the shepherds. As I said before, you can have your Kindom, but it doesn't mean that the pirates dissapear.
Basically what this Thomas guy is saying, is that we as a people need to raise up our culture to something higher in order to throw off shackles of tyranny and oppression, and in his opinion this can't be done with current population levels as most people are simply filler.
Also I think it's worth pointing out that the letter was written by someone not affiliated with the stones, and no response was given from anyone who actually is. So everything in the letter is Thomas's interpretation.
So even your own evidence doesn't support your view of the stones being part of an NWO agenda. Still think you're right?....of course you do.....there's no changing someone as closed minded as you.
You say your impressed that I posted links - if you scroll back you will see I posted more - guess you read what you want to read.
Many members of government are not part of the global conspiracy - these are the ones referred to and perversely called corrupt - Read the tone of the email it is hateful against s 80% of the population.
Sure the email was not by Christan but to Christan the commissioner of the stones on behalf of a bunch of cowards who remain in the shadows.
Closed minded huh get you with your toy gun - Is it for the 80% of the population you say are a problem to your world view does it kill the unworthy as painlessly as possible as you wrote before
To not make the connection with the NWO agenda is your problem not mine
Read other posts that tie in the 10 dictates for your imagined Utopian society with NWO agenda little man
Originally posted by liquidsmoke206
reply to post by artistpoet
Alright...I'll trash you again.......you really are a gluten for punishment aren't you?
Lets address your last post LINE BY LINE so we can really emphasize how utterly ridiculous you are.
Originally posted by liquidsmoke206
reply to post by artistpoet
you just don't get it....the stones are GUIDE LINES for a, hate to use the term, but a utopian society that lives within entirely new cultural norms. Under these circumstances depopulation would be voluntary, as painless as possible, and it would simply be understood that it serves the greater good. If it was aimed at only at world governors why would they build it in the middle of a field?
Originally posted by artistpoet
Originally posted by liquidsmoke206
reply to post by artistpoet
you just don't get it....the stones are GUIDE LINES for a, hate to use the term, but a utopian society that lives within entirely new cultural norms. Under these circumstances depopulation would be voluntary, as painless as possible, and it would simply be understood that it serves the greater good. If it was aimed at only at world governors why would they build it in the middle of a field?
So you never posted the above lines
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
IE depopulation would be voluntary, as painless as possible,
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I must be seeing things
Originally posted by liquidsmoke206
reply to post by Justwork
Really? I am?
Show me where I said that.
Show me NOW. or apologize. I have been saying the exact OPPOSITE the ENTIRE TIME. How could you not see that?
Originally posted by liquidsmoke206
reply to post by Justwork
wow you guys really cant read.....
that is my quote. Show me where I used the word "genocide" or "killing", or "death" in there.
I'm talking about a voluntary reduction in society by any other means hence the word "painless."
In order to interpret what I said as murder and genocide of 6.5 bil people you'd have to also consider killing billions as "painless." Is that really what you think? I guess so.
You people astound me.
Originally posted by liquidsmoke206
reply to post by Justwork
wow you guys really cant read.....
that is my quote. Show me where I used the word "genocide" or "killing", or "death" in there.
I'm talking about a voluntary reduction in society by any other means hence the word "painless."
In order to interpret what I said as murder and genocide of 6.5 bil people you'd have to also consider killing billions as "painless." Is that really what you think? I guess so.
You people astound me.
Originally posted by liquidsmoke206
reply to post by artistpoet
reducing populations does not ONLY MEAN KILLING AND CULLING, there are other ways which I have repeatedly stated.
seriously you ability to interpret written words is soooo sub par. Did you just learn english recently, because if thats the case I'm sorry I'm been so hard on you, otherwise.....you seriously need help.
Originally posted by liquidsmoke206
reply to post by Justwork
you haven't read anything that I've posted. You WANT me to advocate "wiping out," your words...NEVER mine, because that would be an easy position to attack. Do I think a smaller population would be better? Yes. Do I think the best way there is by "wiping out" people? NO, I've never even implied it, you've simply twisted my words and added a few of your own to make it seem that way. Deny ignorance.
Originally posted by liquidsmoke206
you just don't get it....the stones are GUIDE LINES for a, hate to use the term, but a utopian society that lives within entirely new cultural norms. Under these circumstances depopulation would be voluntary, as painless as possible , and it would simply be understood that it serves the greater good. If it was aimed at only at world governors why would they build it in the middle of a field?
Originally posted by liquidsmoke206
People should accept their own deaths, it's inevitable, but they shouldn't accept being "wiped out."
They should also accept that in this modern world having more than one MAYBE 2 kids is unnecessary, and by overloading yourself with responsibilities you end up taking away more of your personal freedoms than the NWO ever has. Populations WILL be reduced one way or another, I'm advocating the least painful way possible, which to you, based on your own interpretations not only includes, but starts with wiping people out.
Originally posted by liquidsmoke206
You could seriously benefit from a reading comprehension test. I've been absolutely consistent in this thread, go ahead, check every post that I've made and try and catch me.....
Originally posted by liquidsmoke206
reply to post by artistpoet
reducing populations does not ONLY MEAN KILLING AND CULLING, there are other ways which I have repeatedly stated.
seriously you ability to interpret written words is soooo sub par. Did you just learn english recently, because if thats the case I'm sorry I'm been so hard on you, otherwise.....you seriously need help.