It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Annee
Originally posted by Viking9019
reply to post by markosity1973
Uhhhh....maybe because over 70% of all Peadophiles are gays!
Remember that its all about the sick perverted mind.
Where'd you pull that lie up from?
Fact is most pedophiles are straight.
While it may seem like men molest boys (and it is assumed they are gay) - - - the fact is they molest by availability.
Priests molest boys because alter boys are available. Now that there are alter girls - - - there has been an increase in molestation of girls - - why? Availability.
Nope.
Legitimate source.
Originally posted by ThirdRock69
reply to post by Annee
Nope.
Legitimate source.
Your so called legitimate source is a Gay / lesbian blog which offers no sources.
How is that legitimate?
Originally posted by FraternitasSaturni
Originally posted by Annee
Originally posted by Viking9019
reply to post by markosity1973
Uhhhh....maybe because over 70% of all Peadophiles are gays!
Remember that its all about the sick perverted mind.
Where'd you pull that lie up from?
Fact is most pedophiles are straight.
While it may seem like men molest boys (and it is assumed they are gay) - - - the fact is they molest by availability.
Priests molest boys because alter boys are available. Now that there are alter girls - - - there has been an increase in molestation of girls - - why? Availability.
Actually... a study published in the Archives of Sexual Behavior (you know.. the clinical psychiatry journal), showed that 86% of pedophiles are either gay or bisexual.
Its not me saying... its the pros!
Examining the Research
One problem is that none of the studies in this area have obtained data from a probability sample, that is, a sample that can be assumed to be representative of the population of all child molesters. Rather, most research has been conducted only with convicted perpetrators or with pedophiles who sought professional help. Consequently, they may not accurately describe child molesters who have never been caught or have not sought treatment.
Another problem related to terminology arises because sexual abuse of male children by adult men2 is often referred to as "homosexual molestation." The adjective "homosexual" (or "heterosexual" when a man abuses a female child) refers to the victim's gender in relation to that of the perpetrator. Unfortunately, people sometimes mistakenly interpret it as referring to the perpetrator's sexual orientation. psychology.ucdavis.edu...
Originally posted by Annee
Originally posted by ThirdRock69
reply to post by Annee
Nope.
Legitimate source.
Your so called legitimate source is a Gay / lesbian blog which offers no sources.
How is that legitimate?
I've used various forms of the same or similar list - - from several different locations/sites for the last 20 years in this same subject discussion.
Some of the sites do go into more detail and sources.
Originally posted by rebellender
Originally posted by Annee
Originally posted by ThirdRock69
reply to post by Annee
Nope.
Legitimate source.
Your so called legitimate source is a Gay / lesbian blog which offers no sources.
How is that legitimate?
I've used various forms of the same or similar list - - from several different locations/sites for the last 20 years in this same subject discussion.
Some of the sites do go into more detail and sources.
are we talking about that Stalinist Leninist Communist Propaganda list?
Is this the list they are referring to?
Originally posted by ollncasino
Originally posted by Miccey
Evolve frikkin neaderthals, this isnt the 13th century you know...
People of a conservative nature do not assume that all change is neccessarily good. You appear to assume that it is (I apologise if I have missunderstood you), which perhaps leaves you somewhat open to manipulation.
Let gays have 'civil partnerships'. Don't call it marriage.
Marriage is a union between a man and a women. Let gays find some other name for a 'civil partnership' but not 'marriage'.
edit on 4-3-2012 by ollncasino because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by volafox
With the so called institution of marriage easily severed with a cheap lawyer and held in such contempt by citizens of the world today, perhaps those have longed for it will do it far more justice than those who have had it all along, yet throw it away so carelessly.
Getting married, being married, and then divorcing is no longer a way of life, its a freaking drama mill for shallow minds and gutless people who will not keep their vows, promises, or word in any way. Heck, its far easier to start over with someone new than to mend the damage done. Its even easier to cause the damage in the first place than to be a mature adult and live with honor and a sense of worth. I want those who are gay to marry if they so wish. Not because it would hack off the religious right (that to me is just a perk) but because they would actually live by the vows they speak before each other. Love, Honor, Cherish. Straight society has proven that for the most part, it is no longer capable of doing such things willingly. Its far more fun to screw around, lie, cheat, spend the spouse's money and trust than to put forth the hard work and effort that a lifetime of friendship and partnership demands. We no longer stay at the same career for very long, we no longer stay married. We no longer have to answer for our shortcomings because we can run away from our responsibilities. Our parents ( most, anyway) managed to work for the same company for ages, stay married for decades. We are far weaker than our ancestors, and that weakness is inherit on both sides of the coin, not just one party but the other. We must take a long look at ourselves, and quit condemning those who will obviously do far better than us.
Originally posted by markosity1973
What do you even mean with a comment like that? If a woman is more dominant in the marriage i.e she is the one that 'wears the pants' does that make her the husband?
Originally posted by markosity1973
So long as it is done it private, both are consenting and no-one gets physically or mentally harmed, how does it affect you or I anyway?
Originally posted by markosity1973
Maybe we need to drop the word marriage all together, that's what NZ did when they legalised it. They called it 'civil unions' i.e a formalised relationship recognised by state, not the church. In other words a marriage in all but name so that the church and traditionalists have something to hold on to with the word marriage.
In Scotland, where this case is concerned, it already is called a 'civil union'.
It's the push for homosexual civil unions to be called 'marriages' which is what I object to.
Originally posted by Annee
Examining the Research
One problem is that none of the studies in this area have obtained data from a probability sample, that is, a sample that can be assumed to be representative of the population of all child molesters. Rather, most research has been conducted only with convicted perpetrators or with pedophiles who sought professional help. Consequently, they may not accurately describe child molesters who have never been caught or have not sought treatment.
Another problem related to terminology arises because sexual abuse of male children by adult men is often referred to as "homosexual molestation." The adjective "homosexual" (or "heterosexual" when a man abuses a female child) refers to the victim's gender in relation to that of the perpetrator. Unfortunately, people sometimes mistakenly interpret it as referring to the perpetrator's sexual orientation. psychology.ucdavis.edu...
Originally posted by nixie_nox
reply to post by ollncasino
Many people also voted that african americans weren't allowed to vote.
Originally posted by ollncasino
Originally posted by nixie_nox
reply to post by ollncasino
Many people also voted that african americans weren't allowed to vote.
You make an interesting point. People should only respect the will of the democratic majority if they personally agree with it?
Isn't that what revolutionaries do?
By the way, when and where did people vote that african americans weren't allowed to vote?
That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, "
Originally posted by VerityPhantom
Instead of calling it any type of marriage we should all just call it civil union.
I think gay people want to get married because of the benefits you get from a legal marriage. Like tax breaks etc...