posted on Mar, 6 2012 @ 09:00 AM
I think some people are getting a bit mixed up here. CGI stands for Computer Generated Imagery (or Imaging, or Image depending on what sentence you
are using it in). I hear this all the time from the debunkers. "CGI, CGI, its 'obviously' CGI"
Are people honestly saying that this film, which is with out a doubt live action, has had computer generated images composited into it? Even today,
with the availability of programs like Adobe After Effects and Final Cut Pro (and many others), it wouldnt be impossible, but it would take a long
time and be incredibly fiddly.
It would be so much easier to use a puppet (or shave a monkey!) than motion track the original footage, make multiple believable stills, layer them up
and animate them, then introduce them into the live action footage etc etc.
Im not saying its impossible, but it would be a right pain in the backside and for what? The dogs are obviously chewing on something- would that be
the CGI that lots of people are talking about?