It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by AaronWilson
reply to post by Annee
I agree. But that means my condoms as well
Originally posted by Nephlim
reply to post by schuyler
weak argument..
less births equals less money the state has to pay to support poor single moms/ unwanted children. preventitive spending.
more alcohol equals more money the state has to pay for rehab, stopping drunk drivers. medical industry has to put higher premiums because alcohol related injuries (car) are the number one killer and maimer of people under 35.
saying birth control is recreation and not worth paying for is a valid argument, but you have to remember that its a preventive cost. and comparing it to free alcohol just does not work.
Originally posted by TomServo
reply to post by schuyler
What do you think is more expensive to the state? BC or 18 years of foster care?
Originally posted by Destinyone
Pass a law to make them use birth control, then you might have me on board.....
Originally posted by Destinyone
LOL...you make it sound like, having sex is mandatory. It's a responsible choice.
Originally posted by Annee
Originally posted by Destinyone
Pass a law to make them use birth control, then you might have me on board.....
I've got a better law. Mandatory DNA testing for paternity.
Target the man and his responsibility - - - he will give women what they need.
Originally posted by doomedtoday
I do not apologize for my opinion, nor do I feel that I should.
Originally posted by doomedtoday
reply to post by Destinyone
And you make it sound like people will simply not have sex. Who is more lacking of intelligence, the man that can admit that his is very aware of the fact that people will have sex, or the man that seems to believe that people will not do so because he so wishes it? I can tell you without a shadow of doubt that one of the few forms of entertainment the poor have is sex, tell them to stop, see how well that works for you. So I am to assume you would rather pay more to raise a child than to prevent it? The simple fact is that people will not stop having sex because they are poor and those with more than them tell them to stop, if anything that will only make them do it more.
Originally posted by Destinyone
Originally posted by Annee
Originally posted by Destinyone
Pass a law to make them use birth control, then you might have me on board.....
I've got a better law. Mandatory DNA testing for paternity.
Target the man and his responsibility - - - he will give women what they need.
I agree. Automatically mandatory for any woman who refuses to list the father on the birth certificate. That is how so many women are getting around the child support laws. They won't list the fathers, so they can't be tracked down by the state to pay for their own children.