posted on Feb, 1 2014 @ 05:57 PM
reply to post by spooky24
The point is to prove that people could easily have been in the towers planting explosives and it wouldn't be that hard to cover up since the company
was already in bush's pocket...
It provides a very plausible way for large amounts of explosives to be placed systematically through out the building.
Its not that crazy of a idea to begin with, I am willing to bet that the WTC towers had construction/renovation almost every day between the two
towers.. They were old buildings, I am sure they needed constant upkeep.
Then you add a massive company with pretty good ties to bush, you know jeb being involved in the company and all, that just so happened to work to the
building leading up to the morning of the attacks AND the almost EXACT floors that were hit by the planes.... Oh and what was that renovation that was
being done, fireproofing.
Just to flip the script, can you prove they didn't
use explosives? I know I won't get an answer on that but that's ok
Since there is more signs to fact that they were present, squibs, the cloud ejection, firefighters eyewitness. Those type of things point more to idea
I guess a better questions is, What should have been there, or been seen, to prove explosions were present that wasn't seen or heard?