Originally posted by ButtUglyToad
Originally posted by Baron01
Originally posted by ButtUglyToad
Originally posted by Baron01
Originally posted by ButtUglyToad
Originally posted by Baron01
A thought cannot exist in the past because it did never exist. For the observer it looks like the thought was real but in reality there were only selfmade (not even selfmade but it feels like that) signals going off in the brain which the observer observes as a thought.
The observer doesn't exist without thought.![]()
Can consciousness exist without thinking thought?![]()
Ribbit![]()
edit on 5-3-2012 by ButtUglyToad because: (no reason given)
The observer doesn't need any thought to exist. If it needs any thought in order to exist it wouldn't exist because thoughts are illusions. Basically everything that occurs within the brain is an illusion. Without the observer (your true self) you wouldn't be here typing on the forum.
The observer is like space. What is always here even if you don't think or do anything at all? Everything changes: your body, your beliefs, your life situation, your clothes. But something which isn't really a thing did not change, it's you. You can call it the observer, God, consciousness, awareness or whatever you like it are just words to describe the indescribable.
Saying the Observer is like Space is like saying the Person is the Body, sew that's kNot a good correlation.![]()
The werd "observer" denotes one that watches, which requires action, which, of course, goes down IN Time and to observe/watch anything requires logical abilities, which then requires math, which require Thinking.
Have you ever thought of the possibility that everything you see as an individual observer is n0thing more than Thought?![]()
As to the indescribable, it's only indescribable if you cannot observe it.Sew just because you dew kNot remember, doesn't mean others suffer from your amnesiatic condition, for the only description for our Mother is m0m.
![]()
Ribbit![]()
The observer isn't an object/energie/matter or whatever you want to call it. Space is like this. It doesn't have a specific place but it's the place itself. Could an object exist if there was no space? Could you experience life if there was no observer? Does a robot experience existence like you? No, a robot doesn't experience anything at all because it isn't an observer. If you weren't the observer you would be like a robot. No experiences, just a body. Maybe a body can't even live without the observer, I dunno.
The observer does not only watch but observes all 5 senses. You aren't what you experience, you're the one behind it. For the observer to observe there has to be action which is movement. Everything is in constant motion except nothing. The observer is nothing and so is space.
How can something or nothing go IN time? Where is this 'time'?
''Have you ever thought of the possibility that everything you see as an individual observer is n0thing more than Thought?''
I don't see anything as an individual observer. The observer isn't a thing.
Everything is describable but what isn't a thing is not describable. We call space 'space' but I can't point my finger to it and say ''look there is space''. Well I could but that would be very silly.![]()
I love this question:
"Could an object exist if there was no space?"
I'd then have to ask, could space exist if there was no object?
Then you asked this:
"Could you experience life if there was no observer?"
I'd then have to ask, could the observer observe without being Life?
Then you asked this:
"Does a robot experience existence like you?"
But then you answered yourself:
"No, a robot doesn't experience anything at all because it isn't an observer."
My question is then, how dew you know the robot doesn't experience anything at all? Did the robot tell you this?
What makes you think a rock can't be an observer?![]()
What makes you think you are Life but a rock isn't?![]()
Ribbit![]()
God. God is the observer and I don't mean some spiritual overlord coming to save humanity but more of a consciousness that transcends all space and time. That's how an observer exists without space and within space observes from every point of time and space to every point of time and space.
edit on 13-3-2012 by libertytoall because: (no reason given)



