It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by SaturnFX
Originally posted by sad_eyed_lady
I watched the video, and I really don't believe the taxpayers should have to pay for her birth control. I don't believe we should have to pay for abortions either. You may not understand, but that's asking me to pay for killing a human being. I am entitled to believe this even if you disagree.
Hows your view then on the state paying welfare to raise that kid that could have been prevented?
Who would need state assisted contraceptives? poor people
what happens when poor people have babies they didn't plan on? They go on welfare for about 18 or so years, and that kid has far less opportunity than one planned out.
So, by -your- decision as a voter that would try to remove contraceptives from availability towards the poor, you directly create welfare babies
Now, I assume you personally believe fully that we should increase the welfare state dramatically in order to work well with your ideals...right? right?
ya..thought so.
Originally posted by sad_eyed_lady
You are kidding?????
People have to accept responsibility for their actions. Don't expect Santa gov to pay for your booze, cigs, house, car or birth control. Want birth control? Get a job and buy it or ask Mom or Dad for the $ not Uncle Sam, or the Christian university you attend.
People have to accept responsibility for their actions.
People have to accept responsibility for their actions.
People have to accept responsibility for their actions.
Originally posted by sweetliberty
Ms. Fluke doesn't represent most women.
Originally posted by Muttley2012
Originally posted by sweetliberty
Ms. Fluke doesn't represent most women.
I dare you to back this statement up with some factual sources....I won't be holding my breath.
Originally posted by sweetliberty
Originally posted by Muttley2012
Originally posted by sweetliberty
Ms. Fluke doesn't represent most women.
I dare you to back this statement up with some factual sources....I won't be holding my breath.
Sandra Fluke does not speak for me
Originally posted by Muttley2012
Originally posted by sweetliberty
Originally posted by Muttley2012
Originally posted by sweetliberty
Ms. Fluke doesn't represent most women.
I dare you to back this statement up with some factual sources....I won't be holding my breath.
Sandra Fluke does not speak for me
So, you are trying to pass off one person's blog as definitive evidence that most women don't agree with Ms. Fluke?
Try again. Some statistics would be nice.
Still not going to hold my breath....you will never prove your position; as it is seeded in lies.
Originally posted by Feltrick
I've always wondered if Rush Limbaugh isn't actually a Democrat. Perhaps there's a conspiracy in there somewhere. I mean, everytime he opens his mouth, he makes the Dems look good. Bill O'Reilly fits this conspiracy as well.
They have never helped the Republican party, they are the ones spouting class warfare, they are the ones who are bigoted....the list goes on.
Rush Limbaugh is a Democrat in Republican's clothing.
Originally posted by SaturnFX
Originally posted by Quadrivium
First let me say Rush was incorrect to attack this woman in such a personal manner.
But this whole line of thinking has got me wondering........
Will they also start giving male students $3,000 a year to help them have sex as well? They can get the condoms they need for free at pph, so I guess that will leave a lot left for call girls.
Quad
Men can't get raped and become pregnant. There is a difference. Men having sex can be without consequence that ends up being a burden on the state, or an even tougher choice down the line (abort).
Originally posted by Muttley2012
Originally posted by Feltrick
I've always wondered if Rush Limbaugh isn't actually a Democrat. Perhaps there's a conspiracy in there somewhere. I mean, everytime he opens his mouth, he makes the Dems look good. Bill O'Reilly fits this conspiracy as well.
They have never helped the Republican party, they are the ones spouting class warfare, they are the ones who are bigoted....the list goes on.
Rush Limbaugh is a Democrat in Republican's clothing.
This description fits most all "Republicans"....perhaps they are all closet Democrats....they're just in the closet...afraid to come out....apparently god hates democrats and they don't want to burn in their imaginary hell they were indoctrinated to believe in.
Originally posted by sweetliberty
Did you bother to see the comment section of what I posted?
Originally posted by Quadrivium
Originally posted by Muttley2012
Originally posted by Feltrick
I've always wondered if Rush Limbaugh isn't actually a Democrat. Perhaps there's a conspiracy in there somewhere. I mean, everytime he opens his mouth, he makes the Dems look good. Bill O'Reilly fits this conspiracy as well.
They have never helped the Republican party, they are the ones spouting class warfare, they are the ones who are bigoted....the list goes on.
Rush Limbaugh is a Democrat in Republican's clothing.
This description fits most all "Republicans"....perhaps they are all closet Democrats....they're just in the closet...afraid to come out....apparently god hates democrats and they don't want to burn in their imaginary hell they were indoctrinated to believe in.
From your earlier post to SL.......
" I dare you to back this statement up with some factual sources....I won't be holding my breath."
Quad
Originally posted by kaylaluv
Originally posted by reddwhite
reply to post by David9176
I think you didnt get the whole story. The girl was quoted as saying she was having so much sex she couldnt afford the $1800-$3000 a month for it, and that it was her right to have it paid for by tax payer.
Alot of the people at her school George town I believe it was, are also not very enamored with her statements.
I havent even read any other post yet, but I bet that alot of you guys wont even research before passing judgement on Limbaugh.
I totally disagree with your OP, but I will S+F this post if I am wrong.
I don't think you understood what she was saying. She said it could cost up to $3,000 over the course of law school - not each month. And I believe she was referring to the cost of the birth control pill, which can cost $50-60/month. Over 3-4 years of law school, it can add up to $3000 total. She WAS NOT quoted as saying she was having so much sex, it was costing her $3,000 a month for it. Get real.
The girl was quoted as saying she was having so much sex she couldnt afford the $1800-$3000 a month for it, and that it was her right to have it paid for by tax payer.