It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Fluke came to Georgetown University interested in contraceptive coverage: She researched the Jesuit college’s health plans for students before enrolling, and found that birth control was not included. “I decided I was absolutely not willing to compromise the quality of my education in exchange for my health care,” says Fluke, who has spent the past three years lobbying the administration to change its policy on the issue. The issue got the university president’s office last spring, where Georgetown declined to change its policy.
Originally posted by DoNotForgetMe
Reply to post by kaylaluv
In a sense yes I would pay but not chemo. I do not use modern medicine. I do not use OTC or prescribed drugs. Only natural remedies. But I understand what you are implying. My point was I do not ask for anyone to pay for my habit. I buy my cigs. But if BC fails to work and a baby is created should the medical costs be put on someone else's shoulders? Since the BC would be paid for other than the user?
Posted Via ATS Mobile: m.abovetopsecret.com
Originally posted by OutKast Searcher
Bravo Obama...good for you. Maybe some conservatives can take some notes on how to make a statement on the issue while staying above the pettiness.
And this is the difference between liberals and conservatives.
Liberal view on women using contraception: It is their right to be able to plan their future with contraception, it is a medical issue and thus should be covered under health insurance.
Conservative view on women using contraception: They are whores and sluts who should keep their legs closed.
The same type of thinking goes for homosexuals, the poor, and immigrants.
Liberals on homosexuals: They are people too, government shouldn't rule who you should love. Their HUMAN rights should be protected.
Conservatives on homosexuals: Screw em, They are disgusting perverts and should be shamed into conforming to MY views.
Liberals on the poor: We should help people who have fallen on hard times.
Conservatives on the poor: Screw em, they are lazy idiots that just want to leech off of us.
Liberals on immigrants: We should be accepting to people who want to come here and make a better life for themselves, we should make it easier on them to come here legally.
Conservative on immigrants: Screw em...they look different, speak different, and act different than "true" Americans...we got here first...they can go back to where they came from.
I really think people who have voted Republican for decades may finally be waking up to the fact that they have been decieved to vote against their own, and fellow countrymens, interests.
Originally posted by OutKast Searcher
Bravo Obama...good for you. Maybe some conservatives can take some notes on how to make a statement on the issue while staying above the pettiness.
And this is the difference between liberals and conservatives.
Liberal view on women using contraception: It is their right to be able to plan their future with contraception, it is a medical issue and thus should be covered under health insurance.
Conservative view on women using contraception: They are whores and sluts who should keep their legs closed.
The same type of thinking goes for homosexuals, the poor, and immigrants.
Liberals on homosexuals: They are people too, government shouldn't rule who you should love. Their HUMAN rights should be protected.
Conservatives on homosexuals: Screw em, They are disgusting perverts and should be shamed into conforming to MY views.
Liberals on the poor: We should help people who have fallen on hard times.
Conservatives on the poor: Screw em, they are lazy idiots that just want to leech off of us.
Liberals on immigrants: We should be accepting to people who want to come here and make a better life for themselves, we should make it easier on them to come here legally.
Conservative on immigrants: Screw em...they look different, speak different, and act different than "true" Americans...we got here first...they can go back to where they came from.
I really think people who have voted Republican for decades may finally be waking up to the fact that they have been decieved to vote against their own, and fellow countrymens, interests.edit on 2-3-2012 by OutKast Searcher because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by sad_eyed_lady
I watched the video, and I really don't believe the taxpayers should have to pay for her birth control. I don't believe we should have to pay for abortions either. You may not understand, but that's asking me to pay for killing a human being. I am entitled to believe this even if you disagree.
When I look around my campus, I see the faces of the women affected, and I have heard more and more of their stories. On a daily basis, I hear from yet another woman from Georgetown or other schools or who works for a religiously affiliated employer who has suffered financial, emotional, and medical burdens because of this lack of contraceptive coverage. And so, I am here to share their voices and I thank you for allowing them to be heard. Without insurance coverage, contraception can cost a woman over $3,000 during law school. For a lot of students who, like me, are on public interest scholarships, that’s practically an entire summer’s salary. Forty percent of female students at Georgetown Law report struggling financially as a result of this policy. One told us of how embarrassed and powerless she felt when she was standing at the pharmacy counter, learning for the first time that contraception wasn’t covered, and had to walk away because she couldn’t afford it. Women like her have no choice but to go without contraception. Just last week, a married female student told me she had to stop using contraception because she couldn’t afford it any longer. Women employed in low wage jobs without contraceptive coverage face the same choice.
These denials of contraceptive coverage impact real people. In the worst cases, women who need this medication for other medical reasons suffer dire consequences. A friend of mine, for example, has polycystic ovarian syndrome and has to take prescription birth control to stop cysts from growing on her ovaries. Her prescription is technically covered by Georgetown insurance because it’s not intended to prevent pregnancy. Under many religious institutions’ insurance plans, it wouldn’t be, and under Senator Blunt’s amendment, Senator Rubio’s bill, or Representative Fortenberry’s bill, there’s no requirement that an exception be made for such medical needs.
Originally posted by Quadrivium
First let me say Rush was incorrect to attack this woman in such a personal manner.
But this whole line of thinking has got me wondering........
Will they also start giving male students $3,000 a year to help them have sex as well? They can get the condoms they need for free at pph, so I guess that will leave a lot left for call girls.
Quad
Originally posted by reddwhite
reply to post by David9176
I think you didnt get the whole story. The girl was quoted as saying she was having so much sex she couldnt afford the $1800-$3000 a month for it, and that it was her right to have it paid for by tax payer.
Alot of the people at her school George town I believe it was, are also not very enamored with her statements.
I havent even read any other post yet, but I bet that alot of you guys wont even research before passing judgement on Limbaugh.
I totally disagree with your OP, but I will S+F this post if I am wrong.
Originally posted by SaturnFX
Incidently, I fully encourage the right wing continue to keep contraception as their staging post for their re-election campaigns.
a whopping 12% of the american public are siding with them...with numbers like that, no doubt you will get exactly what you want