It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by lonewolf19792000
Originally posted by LittleBlackEagle
he may not bluff, but he sure as hell lies a lot.
"Yes we can"?
Reverse the audio of that and it comes out "thank you Satan".
Nope. The US will pressure Israel not to attack either.
Originally posted by Recollector
reply to post by beezzer
Sure, sure...will you think the same after Israel bombs 2-3 iranian nuclear sites?
Iran will know 100% that USA was helping Israel bombing their sites.
After the bombings, along a retaliatory strike against Israel, Iran will also retaliate against US navy and bases in the region, because the Great Satan (USA) was working hand in hand with Little Satan (Israel) in bombing their nuclear sites.
What will Obama do AFTER US Navy ships and bases are attacked in retaliations from Iran?
I think you only ment US will NOT attack Iran FIRST...
Originally posted by ignant
As of the year 2000, there were seven countries without a Rothschild-owned Central Bank:
Afghanistan
Iraq
Sudan
Libya
Cuba
North Korea
Iran
Then.......... along came the convenient terror of 9-11 and soon Iraq and Afghanistan had been added to the list, leaving only five countries without a Central Bank owned by the Rothschild Family:
Sudan
Libya
Cuba
North Korea
Iran
We all know how fast the Central Bank of Benghazi was set up.
The only countries left in 2011 without a Central Bank owned by the Rothschild Family are:
Cuba
North Korea
Iran
Originally posted by Scripter
reply to post by Azadok
Oh please, even if Iran was trying to obtain nuclear weapons(which they are not) this idea that as soon as they get one they will attack Israel and in turn be destroyed not long after is completely absurd and based on fantasy, not reality. Just like every other country it would be used as a deterrence. Oh and if you want to talk about hurting the Iranian people, bear in mind that the nuclear power project is extremely popular in Iran, sanctions being placed against them by the west is what hurts the average Iranian, never the people in power, just like half a million children that died in Iraq as a result of sanctions.
Iran has every right to nuclear power and the benefits it brings to a country.
Originally posted by Azadok
Originally posted by lonewolf19792000
Doesn't matter if Iran has nukes. Having nukes is like being the big kid on the block with the best toys and video games that money can buy, but being unable to play with them.
Yes but with the belief system of the powers that be in Iran they will no doubt use them . I mean any government that would march their own children thru mine fields to make way for their troops to fight the Iraqis , would have no problems setting off a nuke in another land or say port across the ocean.
Seriously they have a fountain that runs red like blood for remembrance of that war , sick. The people of Iran are the only ones that are suffering as it always is with these despotic rulers. I do not believe we should be the world police but I certainly believe Iran should not be allowed to enrich uranium. They are just to unstable at the decision making levels .
Originally posted by sykonot
reply to post by IanPaul
Im not sure how far this argument has gone in this or other threads but anyone with half a brain would know you cant get a four syllable phrase or word out of a three syllable phrase or word.
1. Yes 2. We 3. Can
1.Thank 2. You 3. Say 4. Ton
No matter which direction you play it at you cant add and subtract sounds from a playback.
Come on guys really?
Nuclear power relies on fissionable material that can sustain a chain reaction with neutrons. Examples of such materials include uranium and plutonium. Most nuclear reactors use a moderator to lower the kinetic energy of the neutrons and increase the probability that fission will occur. This allows reactors to use material with far lower concentration of fissile isotopes than nuclear weapons
Originally posted by thecrippler
There's no "Iran vs. Israel war" there is "Russia+China vs.USA+Europe".
Don't fool yourself thinking that the point is Iran/Israel. The point here is WORLD DOMINANCE...
Originally posted by beezzer
reply to post by storm2012
Bull cookies.
(sorry for the swear)
I still sand fast in my conviction that Obama will NOT attack Iran. It won't be popular. The soldiers are damned tired, America is damned tired. And Obama is a self-serving narcisist.
Originally posted by Azadok
Originally posted by lonewolf19792000
Doesn't matter if Iran has nukes. Having nukes is like being the big kid on the block with the best toys and video games that money can buy, but being unable to play with them.
Yes but with the belief system of the powers that be in Iran they will no doubt use them . I mean any government that would march their own children thru mine fields to make way for their troops to fight the Iraqis , would have no problems setting off a nuke in another land or say port across the ocean.
Seriously they have a fountain that runs red like blood for remembrance of that war , sick. The people of Iran are the only ones that are suffering as it always is with these despotic rulers. I do not believe we should be the world police but I certainly believe Iran should not be allowed to enrich uranium. They are just to unstable at the decision making levels .
Originally posted by GhostLancer
The time has come.
Iran has gone too far in calling for death and destruction to Israel and the West. Iran is a country with so much oil it does not need nuclear technology. Yet it is developing it to what end? Simultaneously its leader publicly calls for the death and destruction of others. Connect the dots. The nuclear program was never intended to for energy reasons.
Iran (not its people, but its leaders) is like a child with a flamethrower in a library.
How long do you wait to remove dangerous toys from bloodthirsty, child-like madmen?
How long do you wait to remove dangerous toys from bloodthirsty, child-like madmen?