It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Freeborn
Islam will not take over Europe.
And it most certainly won't take over the UK.
Yes, we do have a problem with creeping Islamification but to be fair it hardly affects the lives of the vast majority of people here in the UK at present.
Islam seems to be both demonised and granted special privelidges at the same time with Muslims appearing to have far more say and influence proportionally than their numbers, much the same as Jews.
At present Islamic extremists are the single biggest threat to national security and as such they will be the focus of attention.
That is an undeniable fact.
They are also increasingly vocal in their opposition to the very foundations that this country was built on and seek to use our freedoms to eventually deny us those self same freedoms.
This will not happen.
Unless politicians from the three main political parties start listening to the genuine cares and concerns of the British people then there will be a backlash like this nation has not seen for hundreds of years.
And the majority of innocent Muslims will suffer.
And what would be TPTB reaction to that be?
Even further restrictions on civil liberties and another step closer to the return to Victorianesque society that Cameron and his buddies seem hell bent on.
We must force the politicians to take the necessary steps to eliminate the terrorist threat and stop the creeping Islamification, stop the open gate immigration policy whilst encouraging the majority of decent and hard working Muslims to integrate into British society and help it to continue growing and developing.
No easy task, but a worthwhile one.
But that requires a different level of politicians, one's that put the well being of this nation and it's citizens first and before their own personal ambitions of self-advancement, profiteering and adhesion to stagnated, indoctrinated and outdated party ideals.
Originally posted by naphtali
reply to post by BellaSabre
No, I do not approve of raping anyone! But, when push comes to shove all weapons will be utilized.
Originally posted by whathappenedoverthere
While I agree that Islam poses a threat to the west, I think the government poses a far greater threat.
So your saying you happy to go to these 'backwards' countrys and adhere to there law yet they can come here and impose there own?
Originally posted by Nammu
reply to post by CR4V3N
Let them use their civil law for civil matter if they want. What does it matter to you? Do you really think that suddenly there wil lbe stonings in the street? They've been operating for ages with no issues until now. Just like Jewish Beth Din courts and Catholics have Cannon Law. In Scotland we have our own Scots law too.
Oh but as soon as some brown people want their own civil courts or law the people are up arms
Originally posted by naphtali
reply to post by jNormal
I don't want to cause any offense really, but, I'm an American, I think Detroit is a Muslim hub here in the U.S. but it seems your line here may be the solution to the whole problem:
For those who don't know, Islam oppresses women massively and under Sharia Law, a woman is stoned if she is raped.
Now, I am a woman mind you but if they want war, well this seems to be their undoing. If all Muslim women were raped they would all have to be killed, right. That is Sharia Law, right? Half the problem is taken care of. No women to reproduce with of the "Faith". Then what? War is war. Holy War is Hell!
No, I do not approve of rape, we're only going by their laws. Use these against them. Just saying.
Translation of the Qur'an has always been a problematic and difficult issue in Islamic theology. Since Muslims revere the Qur'an as miraculous and inimitable (i'jaz al-Qur'an), they argue that the Qur'anic text cannot be reproduced in another language or form. Furthermore, an Arabic word, like a Hebrew or Aramaic word, may have a range of meanings depending on the context - a feature present in all Semitic languages, when compared to the moderately analytic English, Latin, and Romance languages - making an accurate translation even more difficult.
I think I should also ask, has anyone in this thread who is actively opposed to Islam ever read the Qur'an?
Is it not genocide to tell the whole world or host countries that you either convert or have your throat cut?
Answer me this question? When it does come down to this, whatever means necessary, is a viable weapon to use against those who are already using it in Norway as another poster already has told us. Know your enemy.
These people are mistaking kindness for stupidity. No, I do not approve of raping anyone! But, when push comes to shove all weapons will be utilized.
Tell me again which group I should be more concerned about; the occasional Islamic preacher who dreams of being top dog in a country where he won't be hanged for being competition? Or the thousands of racist, ignorant and arrogant fools who justify their violent intolerance with bulls**t about invasion and "religious war"?