It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by juveous
Fine with me. I doubt I can change your mind about that anyway.
I don't know.
Investigation isn't over now is it? Do you think they will be able allowed to physically examine the Microfilm on the document in Hawaii?
Originally posted by Southern Guardian
My main problem was the fact you tried to make the 'eligibility' question of little relevance to the investigation, which I saw as dishonest given how blatantly obvious the purpose of the investigation was. It is very hard to have a reasonable debate with somebody if they are continiously deceptive and dishonest about their true positions and views.
I don't know.
Yep You didn't understand correctly. when you know you asked me 2 questions. Hey guess which one I was answering. I think it was obvious, so don't act confused. EDIT: Actually, since I didn't answer if it was the short form or long form, it could be confusing. - But since I said, "its not the one in question" I assumed, you knew I was talking about short form. Either way, I was commenting about Arpaio, not myself, which is what you asked.
You just said you believed he was qualified for office and that he has proven sufficiently, now you do not? Did I not understand you correctly?
If you're unsure about whether Obama has proven that he is eligible for the presidency then just simply say 'no, I don't believe he has demonstrated that he is eligible'. It really isn't that hard to answer a question straight forward.
They already concluded it was fraud and digitally created, so why would you suggest the investigation would continue over the authenticity of his birth certificate?
Originally posted by juveous
I made it clear that the investigation was about Fraud,
Actually, since I didn't answer if it was the short form or long form, it could be confusing.
Do you only see in black and white too?
Because they stated they wanted to investigate the physical document.
Until the Whitehouse discredits the charges of fraud,
by not discrediting their character, and addressing the evidence that the posse is presenting,
Originally posted by navy_vet_stg3
Yes, that's exactly what I believe (remember, there is a BIG difference between "belief" and "knowledge"). He would qualify, if he used his Indonesian passport, like any Indonesian would do, and simply not claim his U.S. Citizenship.
Article 2.
(1)A foreign child of less than 5 years age who is adopted by a citizen of the Republic of Indonesia acquires the citizenship of the Republic of Indonesia, if such an adoption is declared legal by the Pengadilan Negeri at the residence of the person adopting the child.
h.have no nationality, or have lost his nationality if the petitioner acquires the citizenship of the Republic of Indonesia
b. be born within the territory of the Republic of Indonesia at the time of presenting the petition be domiciled in said region for at least the last 5 consecutive years or in total 10 inconsecutive years;
Applicants cannot hold citizenship in a partner country and U.S. citizenship/permanent residency.
Originally posted by Southern Guardian
Originally posted by juveous
You crack me up with your persistence. I also talked about the focus of the investigation, and the press conference - but when I said the word "focus" you got butthurt, even though I'm right.
You stated that 'eligibility' was not a question leading the investigation, you also claimed that neither Arpaio or his people made this investigation about eligibility, which was false as referenced from the conference transcripts itself. We know the investigation focuses on fraud, but the purpose of it surrounds the 'eligibility question' from birthers.
The question was rather that simple.
A) You believe Obama is eligible to the presidency, you do not question it.
B) You don't believe Obama has settled the question of eligibility.
I'll assume that it's A for you? Shall we stick with this?
Because they stated they wanted to investigate the physical document.
But does this make sense to you? They've already concluded beyond a doubt of theirs in this investigation that the long form birth certificate is fraud, and yet they want to investigate the physical document. Doesn't one come after the other?
There will always be charges of fraud mounted at the whitehouse and the government. Anybody can make a charge of fraud in this country, this doesn't mean the whitehouse and the government needs to respond.
The difference between some fraud charges and others is that of substance and credibility. Arpaio's investigation lacks credibility and substance. Arpaio's supporters will obvious disagree and look beyond reality (such as yourself here) but this isn't going to change anything. But hey, I'll just allow you to sit back and hope something will come out of this. Birthers have dones this on numerous occasions over the last 4 years.
by not discrediting their character, and addressing the evidence that the posse is presenting,
The posse have no credentials to show for their findings, the leaders of the investigation are known to have personal and political issues with Obama. You want the rest of us to ignore this and just accept their findings with blind faith. No, that's not going to happen. I'm really not sure where you got this idea that this will be the case.
Originally posted by juveous
The question was rather that simple.
A) You believe Obama is eligible to the presidency, you do not question it.
B) You don't believe Obama has settled the question of eligibility.
I'll assume that it's A for you? Shall we stick with this?
Sure...Oh wait, I don't know how you might interpret sure. So, yes.
Given the excuses from the Whitehouse, they can conclude fraud, but that's just the digital copy. Right, maybe Obama should have just called for forensic experts to verify his physical document, before releasing it online
You just said anybody, and then said it doesn't mean the government needs to respond? So what you are saying is that they are above the law.
And Obama supporters won't even address evidence.
They present the information under the impression that others can test it themselves.
Originally posted by juveous
and it's the Obama administration's own fault for letting it go on.
Originally posted by Southern Guardian
Originally posted by juveous
Hawaiian Health officials have already verified the authenticity of the birth certificate. I suppose they were lying?
You know full well that I meant. I'll repeat it to you. Anybody can make a charge of fraud against the whitehouse and the goverment, that doesn't mean that there needs to be a response to every accusation. This also doesn't mean that every accusation is valid and of substance. Do you disagree?
Good on them. Even though, searching through the site, I didn't see much that addressed in detail what the posse was investigating.
There have already, much of the claims presented by Arpaio and company are not new revelations, they've been floating around since the initial release of the long form birth certificate:
www.obamaconspiracy.org...
This guy raises some good points, and I listened to his portion on the RC radio show. He said that he didn't even see anything that was presented was new, which probably why the posse didn't even approach the man lol. From the sounds of it, this man presents that he could counter everything that was presented from a technical point of view. He also said there were more ways to optimize the document in the program than people on earth, which was just interesting.
John woodman:
www.obamabirthbook.com...
On the record, John woodman considers himself a 'tea partier', and no exactly an Obama supporter. Whether this is true or not is up to you, but he does a fairly good analysis on the claims from birthers over the authenticity of Obama's birth certificate.
Originally posted by Shoonra
reply to post by Human_Alien
So we were interested in whether the certificate was on legal paper because that would show authenticity.
Actually the b/c was on the proper paper. A federal law* enacted in 2004 requires the birth certificates of all the states to be printed on "safety paper" or some other contrivance to prevent falsification (including counterfeiting of b/cs, alterations, etc.). Hawaii used this green safety paper; makes it darn near impossible to alter or counterfeit. Among other features, the green pattern seems to drive Photoshop and other common imaging software nuts.
So guess what? Arpaio's self-styled experts are basing their accusations on the fact that the internet scan of the b/c on safety paper drove their Photoshop programs nuts trying to analyze the image. They don't seem to realize that is evidence of authenticity. Instead they come up with gibberish about "9 layers" - with parts of words on different layers; I bet they couldn't produce a document that registers that way!
The Hawaii Dept of Health says it's genuine, and it said this even last year when they had a Republican Governor. At what point do we tell the amateurs to STFU?!
* The federal law is Public Law 108-458, sec. 7211(b)(3)(A), 118 Stat 2826, Dec. 17, 2004; codified at 5 USC sec 301 Official Notes.
Originally posted by stuncrazy
reply to post by Xcalibur254
that's not true in even the slightest way. if you are born in mexico, it doesn't matter if you're parents are american citizens. you're citizenship is in mexico. it'll be easy to get dual citizenship, but you are first a mexican citizen.
source
Originally posted by juveous
Yep. Someone had to have covered it up. I am saying that from what you are to assume.
To a degree I agree. Who determines what is valid and what has substance, you? Maybe there should just be a vote on it.
There's a bigger problem of he said he said going on here, because of how tests are done. Depending on what you test for, you can continuously get more creative in finding inconsistencies.
but why not hold it to the standards of those that are accusing?
Originally posted by juveous
The investigation is not irrelevant to me. I have my reasons for making it relevant, like for the fact that I just moved to Maricopa County.