I had to quote your post in case you decided to edit it. This is the most absurd post I have seen.

It really does show your bias on this matter.

Who killed Jesus Christ again ?
not the palestinians

its always ok for Israel to kill others (including Jesus) ..

Doesn't this say it all?

You just implied, something that happened thousands of years ago, has something to do with current events.

You do understand how crazy that sounds right?

Just an exemple .. if they can kill Jesus
they certainly can kill anyone innocent
THAT DONT DISERVE TO BE KILLED .. that are no threat to anyone
wonder why they have no restrain of launching so many cluster bombs
and the nasty white phophorous bomb on innocent civilians
Their silly excuse was .. its to make light like flares

ready to do the same on Iran but this time with nukes
what kind of idiotic evil soul would agree to murder more people on a lie

edit on 3/1/2012 by Ben81 because: (no reason given)

Originally posted by Ben81
It wasnt hard to arrive at this conclusion
that the Israeli regime is a terrorist organisation
far worst then Amhadinejad himself

Who killed Jesus Christ again ?
not the palestinians

ROFL. This is all I have to say. It's shameful to even address something in this pitiful whiny thread, but that bit was simply hilarious.

Really sounds like what someone wrapped around in tin-foil paper in his basement would say to his little followers at his anti-everything blog.

Originally posted by IsraeliGuy

Originally posted by Ben81
It wasnt hard to arrive at this conclusion
that the Israeli regime is a terrorist organisation
far worst then Amhadinejad himself

Who killed Jesus Christ again ?
not the palestinians

ROFL. This is all I have to say. It's shameful to even address something in this pitiful whiny thread, but that bit was simply hilarious.

Really sounds like what someone wrapped around in tin-foil paper in his basement would say to his little followers at his anti-everything blog.

Shameful, beneath you I guess. I see you didn't quote the part about the phosphorus. I agree bring Jesus into this is silly.

How do you respond to my post above and are you for or against an attack on Iran Israeliguy ?

Iraq 1 : Saddam launches dozens of Scud's on Israel. - Israel don't even shot a bullet against Iraq.
Gaza operation launched AFTER thousands of rockets, mortars and missiles launched against Israel.

Ofc, there are many more other wars and strikes lauched by Israel first...but nobody is a virgin.

Iran did not start any war against anyone in last 200 years.True, but based on time (200 years out of 2,500) neither did Israel (10 years out of 64 - UNLESS you agree that Israel is ALSO 2,500 years old...but you will not, because this means palestinians are an invented people and country).

And anyway, you want Israel to be stoped to do what exactly - strike Iran ?
Well, good luck with that.

A strike against Iran is not only necesary, but unavoidable - today, next year or in 10 years.It is COMMON knowledge that MUSLIM states are also having UNSTABLE regimes...i really don't want to live with MUSLIM middle east countries having NUCLEAR capability.Iran will be JUST the first one, followed by Saudi Arabia, Syria and Egypt AT LEAST.

All of them MIGHT have in future REGIMES that will have the CAPABILITY to build nukes AND HATRED for Israel.It really DOESN'T matter if Israel is EVIL or not...those regimes will start a war against Israel that will lead to either a nuclear war (all of middle east will be a radioactive area) with NO WINNERS, or to a conventional war LOST by Israel.

You got it now why Israel HAVE TO attack Iran now, to AT LEAST stop a nuclear arms race in Middle East, a Middle East with ONLY Israel's enemies?

We can ONLY HOPE that the attack against Iran will not lead to a MAJOR war against Israel and the posibility that Israel might be defeated...because man, they will USE nukes.

We can also hope that an attack against Iran can be avoided...but if we are not living in la-la land, we must realize that such hopes are...hopeless.

Originally posted by Maponos
How do you respond to my post above and

I don't.

are you for or against an attack on Iran Israeliguy ?

For an attack on military nuclear reactors and military installations if must. Nothing in me is for an attack on unarmed civilians.

I can't help but think of Harry Hill when reading threads like this...

'Well I like the Muslims attempts to form a caliphate and spread sharia through constant breeding, but I also like the zionist NWO. Which is better? There's only one way to find out...'

(Apologies to the non UK people who have no idea what that means).

Originally posted by InfoKartel
Then address the points I made? Ow wait, you can't, they show you for the hypocrite that you are.

What points did you make? The only ones I came across were that the US/Saudis/Israel are somehow scared of Iran.
..Now that I think of it, I remember you name. You used the same rhetoric on me some time ago and it failed miserably then as well. The thing I remember the most about you is that you argue for the sake of arguing, even if the argument itself holds no input for 6 pages straight.

Well, I doubt I really need to address one guy's claims that anyone is scared of Iran really. I mean, what's so scary about them military-wise anyway? I'd be happy to get into an argument about the military of Iran and who it is capable of scaring. It will most definitely be better than arguing with you for 4 pages on stuff like terminology and our posts themselves.