It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
At the time this article was being developed, many people expressed disbelief that energy weapons existed outside of science fiction until they were reminded of the Star Wars Program, also known as the Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI)*. The name of this article was chosen as a reminder that energy weapons do exist and have been developed over 100 years. Most of this technology is classified information. It can also be assumed that such technology exists in multiple countries. The purpose of this article was to begin to identify the evidence of what happened on 9/11/01 that must be accounted for. In doing so, the evidence ruled out a Kinetic Energy Device (bombs, missiles, etc.) as the method of destruction as well as a gravity-driven "collapse."
Originally posted by GoodOlDave
Originally posted by Iwinder
Ahem I do believe you got off on a little side trip about how hard can it be to crash a jet when the thread topic was all about a phone call...
You do love to derail and get people discussing things that are not even on topic, especially if the topic is one that you yourself "Mr 911 Junkie" does not like or perhaps for a better word makes you nervous?
So you can take me to believe anything in all this at all, Please show me where I called anyone sinister or a secret agent...
Now, this is what I like to refer to as "calling someone's bluff" occurs. This whole thread is revolving around the idea that Mark Bingham's call was faked, and because Mark Bingham's mother recognized the voice as her son's, and because his mother is insisting the call was real, all sorts of conspiracy lovers here are now insisting Bingham's mother is a secret agent. Personally I think it's pretty [censored] in the head to be accusing a woman of being involved in mass murder simply becuase she talked to her son on the telephone, but it makes logical sense why these conspriacy people would do it- they want to believe these conspiracy stories are true, so if it's a choice between accusing his mother of being a sinister secret agent involved in a coverup and admitting their conspiracy claims are wrong, guess what- they're going to accuse his mother of being a sinister secet agent involved in a coverup.
You want to return to the main topic of the discussion? Fine. How about answering this question so I know where you stand, without innuendo or subtle hints: was the call really from Mark or wasn't it? If it wasn't then you're necessarily accusing her of being involved in the coverup, regardless of how desperately you want to have your cake and eat it too.
Typical smear that is expected of you especially after reviewing your posts here.....99 % 911 posts and 100 % of the time everyone is wrong but you.
Said who? I'm made numerous mistakes from quoting material from memory rather than from quoting it while it was in front of me, and when I'm called on it I admit it. This is because I have no agenda other than to the research of the facts of 9/11 so I have nothing to hide. I only wish the truthers were as intellectually honest.
Now answer the question, please.
Originally posted by Iwinder
reply to post by Alfie1
quote" Presumably anyone holding the view that the Mark Bingham calls were faked must also believe that all the calls from UA 93 were faked. After all, why take the risk of faking his when there were many other natural genuine calls ? "
This is a presumably a really stupid statement, why should we believe that if one phone call is fake, the rest are real or any contact via radio or whatever is actually real.
The script you forgot the script all together..........
Regards, Iwinder
Which is also linked to Hurricanes, like Kachina. Oops there was that odd Hurricane, Erin!!!!!! It appeared suddenly up the coast New England area, and then traveled down to NYC on September 11, 2011, and then was never heard of again.
Originally posted by Iwinder
Originally posted by Iwinder
reply to post by Alfie1
quote" Presumably anyone holding the view that the Mark Bingham calls were faked must also believe that all the calls from UA 93 were faked. After all, why take the risk of faking his when there were many other natural genuine calls ? "
This is a presumably a really stupid statement, why should we believe that if one phone call is fake, the rest are real or any contact via radio or whatever is actually real.
The script you forgot the script all together..........
Regards, Iwinder
You certainly do Presume an awful lot of presumptions there, is this the new buzz word for the debunkers?
Regards, Iwinder
Originally posted by Iwinder
Of course it was not from mark and we all know this.....
If you are so genuine on your research agenda on 911 why do always post here and call everybody foolish and stupid?
Originally posted by thedman
reply to post by Pigraphia
Timing of attack was determined by airline schedules
Originally posted by tallblondealien
I remember distinctly, in the days prior to 9/11, either a news broadcast or some other info service, a video of large numbers of armored cars leaving the basement (garage) and comments being made to the affect(?) that they wondered if gold was being removed. Never saw it again, nor have I been able to search and find any info relating to this. (At the time I did not have internet access). Also, a subject that seems to be never brought up is a fact that on any given day, in the WTC buildings have 100,000 people working and visiting them. (or each one). Where are all the people who frequent these buildings? Pertaining to the Building in Oklahoma City that was blown up I saw a report that Government employees were given the day off, for some reason. Thus, the total # of casualties was greatly reduced. Of course, this was a good thing. I hope someone else remembers some of this.
Still waiting for your web site since you have claimed to be a 911 researcher.
Originally posted by GoodOlDave
Originally posted by Iwinder
Of course it was not from mark and we all know this.....
If you are so genuine on your research agenda on 911 why do always post here and call everybody foolish and stupid?
DING DING DING BS ARTIST ALERT
You've just been caught at a lie. This whole debate was instigated by YOUR question-
"So you can take me to believe anything in all this at all, Please show me where I called anyone sinister or a secret agent..."
...and then you turn around and insist...not claim, not speculate, not wonder, but INSIST...the call from the plane wasn't from Mark. Since Mark's mother personally vouches that the call was real, you ARE necessarily accusing her of being in collusion with the coverup of this sinister secret plot to murder 3000 people. You're also necessarily implying by association that all the OTHER calls were fake and all the OTHER people who talked to them are involved in the coverup. It's the entire reason why you conspiracy people are picking apart Mark Bingham's phone call rather than the call from Deena Burnett, who was sitting right next to him and called out before he did, because she had a substancial and articulate conversation with her husband and she almost certainly gave Bingham the idea to make a call himself. Burnett's call is a pretty hard nut to crack so you ignore it altogether and instead pick apart Bingham's "he said his full name" call. Either the calls were legitimate or they weren't. If the calls were legitimate then Mark's call was real. If they're not legitimate then all the people they talked to are involved in your conspiracy too. You can't have it both ways.
Incidentally, nowhere...not even once...have I ever said the truthers were "stupid or foolish". I'm saying you're getting all this conspiracy rubbish from those damned fool conspiracy web sites pushing this nonsense to make a fast buck and you're simply the victim in their con game. Nobody, but nobody, watched the events of the day unfold and instinctively thought "the calls from the planes were generated by secret gov't voice synthesis technology". They're unquestionably getting that from those internet con artists.