reply to post by pierregustavetoutant
As with any scientific theory, the true test is "falsifiability." Can you take a given theory and test it to see if it is false under certain
For the AGW advocates, their greatest enemies are themselves and their "models."
Go back 10 years, 20 years, and look at what the models "predicted."
How do those "predictions" compare to the recent past and present day?
Global warming advocate Dr. Steven Schneider claimed the west Antarctic ice sheet could melt before the year 2000 and inundate American coastlines
with up to 25 feet of sea level rise.
NCAR Forecast : Sea Level May Rise
15-25 Feet Before The Year 2000
What about federally-funded AGW prophet Mark Serreze, of the US National Snow and Ice Data Center, who predicted the complete loss of polar ice in
Exclusive: Scientists warn that there may be no ice at North Pole this summer
(As it turns out, the Arctic Ocean contained 1.65 million square miles of sea ice at its 2008 minimum.)
The false prophets of the AGW religion depend upon sensationalist headlines with no rational support to sustain the hysteria and their public funding.
Hansen falsely "predicted" NYC would be under water by 1998, then 2010, now 2020.
IPCC falsely claims no Himalayan glaciers within the next 25 years.
IPCC and climate "scientists" falsely predicted HUMAN migrations in the billions by 2010 due to AGW."Climate scientists" have falsely predicted
total disappearance of Arctic ice by 1998, 2000, and 2008.
The AGW models intentionally do not account for factors the "climate scientists" agree influence climate.
The AGW models intentionally employ manipulated data and reject direct observation.