It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by andersensrm
Originally posted by captaintyinknots
Originally posted by andersensrm
Originally posted by captaintyinknots
reply to post by andersensrm
You continue to make these statments, with zero backing. I had a savings above $10,000 when I got laid off. I stretched it as far as I could.
Many people simply do not make enough to save for hard times.
What of those who have had a life crisis which took away what they had?
Why do you continue to avoid your burden of proof on these claims?
Well then you would go on welfare, for however long you needed to. It won't be the end of the world, if for a few months, or possibly years, you would have to endure shopping at another store, and not being able to vote, I don't see how this is sooo horrible.
Its so horrible because it is taking away my constitutional right for no apparent reason other than some snobby fools think its a good idea.
Why do you still avoid, and divert, from your burden of proof?
Nevermind the proof, your getting stuck on the little picture as opposed to the big one. People expect the government to take care of them. This mentality needs to change.
Originally posted by andersensrm
reply to post by captaintyinknots
Myself. I'll go homeless if I have to.
Originally posted by andersensrm
Originally posted by captaintyinknots
Originally posted by andersensrm
Originally posted by captaintyinknots
reply to post by andersensrm
You continue to make these statments, with zero backing. I had a savings above $10,000 when I got laid off. I stretched it as far as I could.
Many people simply do not make enough to save for hard times.
What of those who have had a life crisis which took away what they had?
Why do you continue to avoid your burden of proof on these claims?
Well then you would go on welfare, for however long you needed to. It won't be the end of the world, if for a few months, or possibly years, you would have to endure shopping at another store, and not being able to vote, I don't see how this is sooo horrible.
Its so horrible because it is taking away my constitutional right for no apparent reason other than some snobby fools think its a good idea.
Why do you still avoid, and divert, from your burden of proof?
Nevermind the proof, your getting stuck on the little picture as opposed to the big one. People expect the government to take care of them. This mentality needs to change.
Originally posted by pilot70
reply to post by ideasarebulletproof
That is obvious .... the guys who pays decides what happens.
If you are invited to a restaurant would you tell the guy pay what the limits are .. he pays he decides.
I have a few exceptions though .... if the reason you live of other are : you are an old person who contributed yours and now enjoy well deserved benefits. You are young and under education preparing to do your part. You are disabled or unable due to the flukes of nature.
But if you live from other peoples money, and you are at fault, why should anyone trust you with voting rights ?
edit on 29-2-2012 by pilot70 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by drgood
reply to post by Laokin
Well you pretty much encapsulated both of our arguments without realizing. Your philosophy is that selling your computer or africans becoming proactive equates to something impossible. My argument is both are possible. Basically I am able to provide for myself while you and the africans are not, so what's the difference between us?
Originally posted by andersensrm
reply to post by Laokin
30 years from now, when the government runs out of money, this will happen all over again with people who are in need of assistance, because they anticipated money from SS. Yes we depend on other people, I get it. The point is, not to depend on the government, and when you say people don't that is BS. People depend on the government for a multitude of things and this needs to change, it is not the role of government. People still get their government assistance, it is just less desirable, and aimed at putting more desire in getting a job, or going back to school to train for a different career. If you go to college and get a degree in East Asian Studies, or underwater basket weaving, what do you expect?
Originally posted by andersensrm
reply to post by captaintyinknots
I see the constitution as an untouchable now, and I get criticized for attempting to change it. Look, no one can come up with a perfect constitution. It doesn't exist. The constitution needs to be continually improved and changed. If this is not allowed to happen, then America will never improve in terms of society. The one we have right now is not perfect, but some claim it to be and thus, should not be changed. In fact our whole system of government seems to be an untouchable, while there are many alternatives we could try, but we don't because we approach it with the biased view that the system we are in now, is better than any other before it, and therefore is the best, and is in no need for change. I believe in less government. The government should only be concerned with governing, nothing else, no handouts, no bailouts, no nothing.
Originally posted by captaintyinknots
Originally posted by andersensrm
reply to post by Laokin
30 years from now, when the government runs out of money, this will happen all over again with people who are in need of assistance, because they anticipated money from SS. Yes we depend on other people, I get it. The point is, not to depend on the government, and when you say people don't that is BS. People depend on the government for a multitude of things and this needs to change, it is not the role of government. People still get their government assistance, it is just less desirable, and aimed at putting more desire in getting a job, or going back to school to train for a different career. If you go to college and get a degree in East Asian Studies, or underwater basket weaving, what do you expect?
When the government runs out of money? The government is out of money, kiddo. If you think its because of welfare, then its time to head back to school.
Originally posted by captaintyinknots
Originally posted by andersensrm
reply to post by Laokin
30 years from now, when the government runs out of money, this will happen all over again with people who are in need of assistance, because they anticipated money from SS. Yes we depend on other people, I get it. The point is, not to depend on the government, and when you say people don't that is BS. People depend on the government for a multitude of things and this needs to change, it is not the role of government. People still get their government assistance, it is just less desirable, and aimed at putting more desire in getting a job, or going back to school to train for a different career. If you go to college and get a degree in East Asian Studies, or underwater basket weaving, what do you expect?
When the government runs out of money? The government is out of money, kiddo. If you think its because of welfare, then its time to head back to school.
Originally posted by andersensrm
Originally posted by captaintyinknots
Originally posted by andersensrm
reply to post by Laokin
30 years from now, when the government runs out of money, this will happen all over again with people who are in need of assistance, because they anticipated money from SS. Yes we depend on other people, I get it. The point is, not to depend on the government, and when you say people don't that is BS. People depend on the government for a multitude of things and this needs to change, it is not the role of government. People still get their government assistance, it is just less desirable, and aimed at putting more desire in getting a job, or going back to school to train for a different career. If you go to college and get a degree in East Asian Studies, or underwater basket weaving, what do you expect?
When the government runs out of money? The government is out of money, kiddo. If you think its because of welfare, then its time to head back to school.
I meant when the government is unable to pay out. And no, I know that welfare makes up a tiny % of the debt.
Originally posted by andersensrm
reply to post by captaintyinknots
The bill of rights was added later to the constitution to get approval from citizens, so I don't think that, rights were what it was purely about.
Originally posted by Laokin
Originally posted by andersensrm
Originally posted by captaintyinknots
Originally posted by andersensrm
reply to post by Laokin
30 years from now, when the government runs out of money, this will happen all over again with people who are in need of assistance, because they anticipated money from SS. Yes we depend on other people, I get it. The point is, not to depend on the government, and when you say people don't that is BS. People depend on the government for a multitude of things and this needs to change, it is not the role of government. People still get their government assistance, it is just less desirable, and aimed at putting more desire in getting a job, or going back to school to train for a different career. If you go to college and get a degree in East Asian Studies, or underwater basket weaving, what do you expect?
When the government runs out of money? The government is out of money, kiddo. If you think its because of welfare, then its time to head back to school.
I meant when the government is unable to pay out. And no, I know that welfare makes up a tiny % of the debt.
So you admit that the problem that you deem a problem is not really a problem right?
You also admit that if you say yes, you are adamantly saying that "If a person makes less than "X" they are not considered a whole person."
Do you still support your claim?edit on 29-2-2012 by Laokin because: (no reason given)