It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by TiM3LoRd
The systematic exaggeration of the Iranian threat
www.abc.net.au
(visit the link for the full news article)
Great news, Iran is not building a bomb and that comes directly from the people who know; the Israelis, the Americans and their security agencies.
In 2007, 16 top US intelligence agencies, including the hard-nosed CIA and Defence Intelligence Agency, assessed that Iran had no nuclear weapons research program at all.
We judge with high confidence that in fall 2003, Tehran halted its nuclear weapons program; … Tehran’s decision to halt its nuclear weapons program suggests it is less determined to develop nuclear weapons than we have been judging since 2005.
Originally posted by sonnny1
Originally posted by munkey66
reply to post by sonnny1
can we now play 10 wars that prove the US are war mongers?
Sure,Start your own thread up.
But how about proving to me,the video doesn't have merit.
When you can prove to me EVERY American is a Warmonger,I am sure that thread will be epic..... Until then,it will be just another thread on ATS,that bashes America,and the people living in it,regardless if the people are not part of the problem. The Policy makers are the problem,just like the the leaders in Iran,are Iran's problem.
If you cant be critical of your own Government,you cant be critical of others.edit on 29-2-2012 by sonnny1 because: spelling
Originally posted by munkey66
Originally posted by sonnny1
Originally posted by munkey66
reply to post by sonnny1
can we now play 10 wars that prove the US are war mongers?
Sure,Start your own thread up.
But how about proving to me,the video doesn't have merit.
When you can prove to me EVERY American is a Warmonger,I am sure that thread will be epic..... Until then,it will be just another thread on ATS,that bashes America,and the people living in it,regardless if the people are not part of the problem. The Policy makers are the problem,just like the the leaders in Iran,are Iran's problem.
If you cant be critical of your own Government,you cant be critical of others.edit on 29-2-2012 by sonnny1 because: spelling
Well being as pedantic as this thread has gone
No one said every American is a war monger, someone made the statement that Americans where war mongers, 1 American, 2 Americans, looking at these forums I can pick more than 2 war Mongers from the US, proving that Americans are war mongers
As for the case that Iran isn't allowing inspectors into a facility, Does Israel allow inspectors into all their nuclear plants?
Does the US allow inspectors into all of their nuclear facilities?
I would say the answer is NO, because the ones making the laws does not have to live by those laws.
Originally posted by reaxi0n
Originally posted by Danbones
reply to post by sonnny1
yupr quote is from the comments section not the article there is a big difference
the fact that you didn't state that is well...telling
and really illustrates the Op's statement about the systematic overstatement of the threat of Iran
way to go
He didn't state it? Weird cause I see this....
Heres a great reply from your "opinionated " source......
Originally posted by Recollector
I didn't even read all the replies, just the OP.
OFCOURSE they are not building nukes...BUT THIS IS NOT THE PROBLEM !
The PROBLEM is Iran CAPABILITY to build nukes.Does anyone, ever, said that Iran WILL NOT build nukes?
Presently, yes, they do not build them...but in the future???Does anyone can be sure they will not build them?
Who can STOP a nuclear arms race in Middle East once Iran starts to build nukes? Every country in ME is a MUSLIM country and every MUSLIM country is UNSTABLE ! What do we want, rogues regimes to sell BUKES to terrorists? Or a nuclear Iran who can make the oil prices go sky high blocking the Hormuz Strait - an NOBODY will do shi.t because they have NUKES.
TBH...Iran, in the simplest logic thinking...WANTS TO HAVE NUKES.Just because NUKES will make them SAFE for any US (Great Satan) or Israel (Little Satan) attacks.edit on 29-2-2012 by Recollector because: *
Originally posted by reaxi0n
reply to post by TiM3LoRd
I said I already posted it here
"Are you special?"
Just in case you have a hard time finding it in that post, here it is.
info.publicintelligence.net...edit on 2-29-12 by reaxi0n because: (no reason given)
Civilian use... including weaponization.... ok wheres the evidence
This approach involves, inter alia, the identification of indicators of the existence or
development of the processes associated with nuclear-related activities, including weaponization.
Ok relevant, anything direct?
43. The information indicates that Iran has carried out the following activities that are relevant to the
development of a nuclear explosive device:
Work on the development of an indigenous design of a nuclear weapon including the testing of
components (Annex, Sections C.5–C.12).
44. While some of the activities identified in the Annex have civilian as well as military applications,
others are specific to nuclear weapons
So theres SOME indicators they are performing nuclear related activites (well no #?), INCLUDING weaponization, but again where is the evidence for weaponization??
Section C, which reflects the Agency’s analysis of the information available to it in
the context of relevant indicators of the existence or development of processes associated with
nuclear-related activities, including weaponization
The Agency is concerned because some of the
activities undertaken after 2003 would be highly relevant to a nuclear weapon programme
27. In 2008, the Director General informed the Board that: it had no information at that time — apart from the uranium metal document — on the actual design or manufacture by Iran of nuclear material components of a nuclear weapon or of certain other key components, such as initiators, or on related nuclear physics studies, and that it had not detected the actual use of nuclear material in connection with the alleged studies.
a foreign expert who was not only knowledgeable in these
technologies, but who, a Member State has informed the Agency, worked for much of his career with this
technology in the nuclear weapon programme of the country of his origin
Information which the Agency has been provided by Member States, some of which the Agency has
been able to examine directly, indicates that Iran has manufactured simulated nuclear explosive
components using high density materials such as tungsten. These components were said to have
incorporated small central cavities suitable for the insertion of capsules such as those described in Section
C.9 below. The end use of such components remains unclear, although they can be linked to other
information received by the Agency concerning experiments involving the use of high speed diagnostic
equipment, including flash X ray, to monitor the symmetry of the compressive shock of the simulated core
of a nuclear device.
Hydrodynamic experiments such as those described above, which involve high explosives in
conjunction with nuclear material or nuclear material surrogates, are strong indicators of possible weapon
development. In addition, the use of surrogate material, and/or confinement provided by a chamber of the
type indicated above, could be used to prevent contamination of the site with nuclear material. It remains
for Iran to explain the rationale behind these activities
The Agency obtained information in 2005 from a Member State indicating that, in 1997,
representatives from Iran had met with officials from an institute in a nuclear-weapon State to request training courses in the fields of neutron cross section calculations using computer codes employing Monte Carlo methodology, and shock wave interactions with metals.
Additionally, among the alleged studies documentation provided by that Member State, is a document, in Farsi, which relates directly to the logistics and safety arrangements that would be necessary for conducting a nuclear test. The Agency has been informed by a different Member State that these arrangements directly reflect those which have been used in nuclear tests conducted by nuclear-weapon States.
The Agency, in conjunction with experts from Member States other than those which had provided the information in question, carried out an assessment of the possible nature of the new payload. As a result of that assessment, it was concluded that any payload option other than nuclear which could also be expected to have an airburst option (such as chemical weapons) could be ruled out. Iran was asked to comment on this assessment and agreed in the course of a meeting with the Agency which took place in Tehran in May 2008 that, if the information upon which it was based were true, it would constitute a programme for the development of a nuclear weapon
US intelligence agencies do not believe that Iran is actively trying to build a nuclear weapon, The Los Angeles Times reported on Wednesday, citing a highly classified intelligence assessment from early 2011.
According to the report, the intelligence estimate holds that Tehran halted efforts to develop and build a nuclear warhead in 2003.
The Los Angeles Times claims that the report, representing the input of 16 US intelligence agencies, indicates that Iran is conducting research that could eventually enable it to develop a nuclear weapon, but that it has not sought to do so
American intelligence analysts continue to believe that there is no hard evidence that Iran has decided to build a nuclear bomb.
Recent assessments by American spy agencies are broadly consistent with a 2007 intelligence finding that concluded that Iran had abandoned its nuclear weapons program years earlier, according to current and former American officials. The officials said that assessment was largely reaffirmed in a 2010 National Intelligence Estimate, and that it remains the consensus view of America’s 16 intelligence agencies.
In 2010, Iran said it had increased the enrichment of uranium from the 3.5% needed for commercial nuclear reactors to the 10-20% needed for a research reactor near Tehran
Weapons-grade uranium is at least 90% enriched
Originally posted by Danbones
ummm
Including a comment to an article as being part of the article?????
Originally posted by Danbones
Saying it is from the same "source" indicates it is from the Ops reference article NOT the comments.
Claiming the quote is from the refence article like that is plain DISHONEST ..
Originally posted by Danbones
and the bit about 90 KM underground?????
The operations at the bunker-like facility south of Tehran, reported by the Kayhan daily newspaper, are small in comparison to Iran's main enrichment site. But the centrifuges at the underground labs are considered more efficient and are shielded from aerial surveillance and protected against airstrikes by up to 300 feet (90 meters) of mountain rock
The vulnerability of the chamber at Fordow, believed buried up to 80 meters (260 feet) deep on a former missile base controlled by the elite Revolutionary Guards Corps, came into sharper focus on Monday when the United Nations nuclear watchdog confirmed that Iran had started enriching uranium at the site.
Originally posted by Danbones
way to totally blow cred...and for supporting that sort of nonsence
Iran has a hidden Nuclear facility,for "peaceful" purposes.......Have an answer for that ?
In June 1981, Israeli jets bombed the Osirak reactor near the Iraqi capital, Baghdad.
More recently, in September 2007, Israeli warplanes attacked a facility in Syria that Israel, the US and many experts believed was a nuclear reactor under construction.
However, a potential strike against Iran would be nothing like the attacks in Iraq and Syria. These were both against single targets, located above ground, and came literally out of the blue.
Originally posted by woodwardjnr
reply to post by sonnny1
Iran has a hidden Nuclear facility,for "peaceful" purposes.......Have an answer for that ?
In June 1981, Israeli jets bombed the Osirak reactor near the Iraqi capital, Baghdad.
More recently, in September 2007, Israeli warplanes attacked a facility in Syria that Israel, the US and many experts believed was a nuclear reactor under construction.
However, a potential strike against Iran would be nothing like the attacks in Iraq and Syria. These were both against single targets, located above ground, and came literally out of the blue.
So I Imagine they have hidden protected Nuclear Facilities to protect them from an out of the blue Israeli attack. Kind of makes sense.
www.bbc.co.uk...